[v2] gpio: Use of_property_read_bool() for boolean properties
Commit Message
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- Actually use of_property_read_bool() as the commit msg says instead
of of_property_present()
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:41 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
> Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:41 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
> Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - Actually use of_property_read_bool() as the commit msg says instead
> of of_property_present()
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
> index 0ce1543426a4..4750ea34204c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stp-xway.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int xway_stp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> /* check which edge trigger we should use, default to a falling edge */
> - if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising", NULL))
> + if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising"))
> chip->edge = XWAY_STP_FALLING;
>
> clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c
> index de6afa3f9716..78f8790168ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tb10x.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int tb10x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tb10x_gpio);
>
> - if (of_find_property(np, "interrupt-controller", NULL)) {
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "interrupt-controller")) {
> struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
>
> ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
Applied, thanks!
Bart
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int xway_stp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
/* check which edge trigger we should use, default to a falling edge */
- if (!of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising", NULL))
+ if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "lantiq,rising"))
chip->edge = XWAY_STP_FALLING;
clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static int tb10x_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tb10x_gpio);
- if (of_find_property(np, "interrupt-controller", NULL)) {
+ if (of_property_read_bool(np, "interrupt-controller")) {
struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
ret = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);