[v3,15/38] leds: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

  In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
those drivers using them.

Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:

> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> those drivers using them.
>
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
  

On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> 
> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > those drivers using them.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Applied, thanks

Sorry should have maybe been more clear, without patch 1 of this series
this won't work as the HAS_IOPORT config option is new and will be
missing otherwise. There's currently two options of merging this,
either all at once or first only patch 1 and then the additional
patches per subsystem until finally the last patch can remove
inb()/outb() and friends when HAS_IOPORT is unset.

Thanks,
Niklas
  

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 13:42, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>> 
>> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
>> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
>> > those drivers using them.
>> > 
>> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
>> > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> Applied, thanks
>
> Sorry should have maybe been more clear, without patch 1 of this series
> this won't work as the HAS_IOPORT config option is new and will be
> missing otherwise. There's currently two options of merging this,
> either all at once or first only patch 1 and then the additional
> patches per subsystem until finally the last patch can remove
> inb()/outb() and friends when HAS_IOPORT is unset.

It's probably too late now to squeeze patch 1 into linux-6.3
as a late preparation patch for the rest of the series in 6.4.

It would be good if you could respin that patch separately
anyway, so I can add it to the asm-generic tree and make
sure we get it ready for the next merge window.

     Arnd
  

On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 14:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 13:42, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > 
> > > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > > > those drivers using them.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > Applied, thanks
> > 
> > Sorry should have maybe been more clear, without patch 1 of this series
> > this won't work as the HAS_IOPORT config option is new and will be
> > missing otherwise. There's currently two options of merging this,
> > either all at once or first only patch 1 and then the additional
> > patches per subsystem until finally the last patch can remove
> > inb()/outb() and friends when HAS_IOPORT is unset.
> 
> It's probably too late now to squeeze patch 1 into linux-6.3
> as a late preparation patch for the rest of the series in 6.4.
> 
> It would be good if you could respin that patch separately
> anyway, so I can add it to the asm-generic tree and make
> sure we get it ready for the next merge window.
> 
>      Arnd

Yes, sorry I was traveling Thursday to Monday and then spent some time
catching up and investigating an internal issue. I'm currently going
through the patches one by one incorporating comments. I fear the split
of the USB patch as well as the suggestions for video might take a bit
of time, so if you prefer I could also send just an updated patch 1
separately. How would I do this cleanly? Send as v4 without(?) a cover
letter and add a Note after the '---'?

Thanks,
Niklas
  

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 15:02, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 14:32 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 13:42, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:

> Yes, sorry I was traveling Thursday to Monday and then spent some time
> catching up and investigating an internal issue. I'm currently going
> through the patches one by one incorporating comments. I fear the split
> of the USB patch as well as the suggestions for video might take a bit
> of time, so if you prefer I could also send just an updated patch 1
> separately. How would I do this cleanly? Send as v4 without(?) a cover
> letter and add a Note after the '---'?

Yes, that sounds good to me. In case you need multiple
versions, I would suggest you continue counting at v4
independently for both the preparation patch and the
rest of the series.

    Arnd
  

On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:

> On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> >
> > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > > those drivers using them.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Applied, thanks
>
> Sorry should have maybe been more clear, without patch 1 of this series
> this won't work as the HAS_IOPORT config option is new and will be
> missing otherwise. There's currently two options of merging this,
> either all at once or first only patch 1 and then the additional
> patches per subsystem until finally the last patch can remove
> inb()/outb() and friends when HAS_IOPORT is unset.

You only sent me this patch.

If there are in-set dependencies, you need to send everyone the whole
set so that we can organise a suitable merge strategy between us.

I'll revert the patch for now.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
  

On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 14:53 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > > 
> > > > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > > > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > > > those drivers using them.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > Applied, thanks
> > 
> > Sorry should have maybe been more clear, without patch 1 of this series
> > this won't work as the HAS_IOPORT config option is new and will be
> > missing otherwise. There's currently two options of merging this,
> > either all at once or first only patch 1 and then the additional
> > patches per subsystem until finally the last patch can remove
> > inb()/outb() and friends when HAS_IOPORT is unset.
> 
> You only sent me this patch.
> 
> If there are in-set dependencies, you need to send everyone the whole
> set so that we can organise a suitable merge strategy between us.
> 
> I'll revert the patch for now.
> 
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]

I know this isn't ideal and I'm sorry for the confusion, extra work and
churn. As far as I know sadly it's not possible to Cc everyone for such
treewide series because the recipient list will hit the limits
supported by some systems and mails get dropped which sucks even more.
Maybe this can be solved in the future though, Konstantin Ryabitsev
actually reached out because I mentioned that I tried using b4 prep /
b4 send but couldn't exactly because it only supports a global
recipient list.

Thanks,
Niklas
  

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:32 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 13:42, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-03-16 at 16:14 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> >>
> >> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> >> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> >> > those drivers using them.
> >> >
> >> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> >> > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/leds/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> Applied, thanks
> >
> > Sorry should have maybe been more clear, without patch 1 of this series
> > this won't work as the HAS_IOPORT config option is new and will be
> > missing otherwise. There's currently two options of merging this,
> > either all at once or first only patch 1 and then the additional
> > patches per subsystem until finally the last patch can remove
> > inb()/outb() and friends when HAS_IOPORT is unset.
>
> It's probably too late now to squeeze patch 1 into linux-6.3
> as a late preparation patch for the rest of the series in 6.4.
>
> It would be good if you could respin that patch separately
> anyway, so I can add it to the asm-generic tree and make
> sure we get it ready for the next merge window.

Through an immutable branch, else all dependencies have to wait
for v6.5?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert
  

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 17:11, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:32 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, at 13:42, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
>
> Through an immutable branch, else all dependencies have to wait
> for v6.5?

Sure, will do. I suspect that there will still be something
left behind that doesn't make it into 6.4, so the final bit
(dropping broken inb/outb implementations) will have to be
6.5 material anyway, but at least we can aim on getting most
of it into 6.4.

     Arnd