bpf: extend btf id list

Message ID 20230307151239.1994179-1-trix@redhat.com
State New
Headers
Series bpf: extend btf id list |

Commit Message

Tom Rix March 7, 2023, 3:12 p.m. UTC
  With clang and W=1, there is this error

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: error: array index 16 is past
 the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]'
 (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds]
    meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) {
                    ^                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here
BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
^
./include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST'
 #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];

When KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr was added to the enum special_kfunc_type
the total exceeded 16.  Increase the array size to 32.

Fixes: 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/btf_ids.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Nick Desaulniers April 7, 2023, 5:34 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:13 AM Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> With clang and W=1, there is this error
>
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: error: array index 16 is past
>  the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]'
>  (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Werror,-Warray-bounds]
>     meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) {
>                     ^                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here
> BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
> ^
> ./include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST'
>  #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
>
> When KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr was added to the enum special_kfunc_type
> the total exceeded 16.  Increase the array size to 32.
>
> Fixes: 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr")

Looks like Nathan's patch got picked up.
commit 2d5bcdcda879 ("bpf: Increase size of BTF_ID_LIST without
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF again")
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230307-bpf-kfuncs-warray-bounds-v1-1-00ad3191f3a6@kernel.org/

> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/btf_ids.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> index 3a4f7cd882ca..166c387b48f7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ extern struct btf_id_set8 name;
>
>  #else
>
> -#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
> +#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[32];
>  #define BTF_ID(prefix, name)
>  #define BTF_ID_FLAGS(prefix, name, ...)
>  #define BTF_ID_UNUSED
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
index 3a4f7cd882ca..166c387b48f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@  extern struct btf_id_set8 name;
 
 #else
 
-#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
+#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[32];
 #define BTF_ID(prefix, name)
 #define BTF_ID_FLAGS(prefix, name, ...)
 #define BTF_ID_UNUSED