erofs: use wrapper i_blocksize() in erofs_file_read_iter()

Message ID 20230306075527.1338-1-zbestahu@gmail.com
State New
Headers
Series erofs: use wrapper i_blocksize() in erofs_file_read_iter() |

Commit Message

Yue Hu March 6, 2023, 7:55 a.m. UTC
  From: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>

linux/fs.h has a wrapper for this operation.

Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
---
 fs/erofs/data.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Gao Xiang March 6, 2023, 2:46 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2023/3/6 15:55, Yue Hu wrote:
> From: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
> 
> linux/fs.h has a wrapper for this operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> ---
>   fs/erofs/data.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/data.c b/fs/erofs/data.c
> index 5bd0c956a142..7e8baf56faa5 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/data.c
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static ssize_t erofs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>   		if (bdev)
>   			blksize_mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1;
>   		else
> -			blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
> +			blksize_mask = i_blocksize(inode) - 1;
>   
>   		if ((iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_count(to) |
>   		     iov_iter_alignment(to)) & blksize_mask)
  
李扬韬 March 9, 2023, 7:15 a.m. UTC | #2
> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static ssize_t erofs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> 		if (bdev)
> 			blksize_mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1;
> 		else
> -			blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
> +			blksize_mask = i_blocksize(inode) - 1;

Since the mask is to be obtained here, is it more appropriate to use GENMASK(inode->i_blkbits - 1, 0)?

Thx,
Yangtao
  
Jingbo Xu March 9, 2023, 7:36 a.m. UTC | #3
On 3/9/23 3:15 PM, Yangtao Li wrote:
>> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static ssize_t erofs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>> 		if (bdev)
>> 			blksize_mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1;
>> 		else
>> -			blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
>> +			blksize_mask = i_blocksize(inode) - 1;
> 
> Since the mask is to be obtained here, is it more appropriate to use GENMASK(inode->i_blkbits - 1, 0)?


FYI it seems that GENMASK macro is widely used in driver and arch code
base, while it's rarely used in fs, except for f2fs.
  
Yue Hu March 9, 2023, 7:37 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu,  9 Mar 2023 15:15:15 +0800
Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> wrote:

> > @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static ssize_t erofs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
> > 		if (bdev)
> > 			blksize_mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1;
> > 		else
> > -			blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
> > +			blksize_mask = i_blocksize(inode) - 1;  
> 
> Since the mask is to be obtained here, is it more appropriate to use GENMASK(inode->i_blkbits - 1, 0)?

It should be another change independently to this patch. rt?

> 
> Thx,
> Yangtao
  
李扬韬 March 9, 2023, 7:42 a.m. UTC | #5
> FYI it seems that GENMASK macro is widely used in driver and arch code base, while it's rarely used in fs, except for f2fs.

I think the following usage can be changed to bitmap api, just like in f2fs?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=c4ca1f7164734a1baf40d4ff1552172a07d4fc4d

fs/erofs/fscache.c:135:         unsigned long flags = 1 << NETFS_SREQ_ONDEMAND;
fs/erofs/internal.h:250:#define SECTORS_PER_BLOCK       (1 << SECTORS_PER_BLOCK)
fs/erofs/internal.h:252:#define EROFS_BLKSIZ            (1 << LOG_BLOCK_SIZE)
fs/erofs/internal.h:354:        return (value >> bit) & ((1 << bits) - 1);
fs/erofs/zmap.c:66:             ((1 << Z_EROFS_VLE_DI_CLUSTER_TYPE_BITS) - 1);
fs/erofs/zmap.c:69:             m->clusterofs = 1 << vi->z_logical_clusterbits;
fs/erofs/zmap.c:114:    const unsigned int lomask = (1 << lclusterbits) - 1;
fs/erofs/zmap.c:141:    const unsigned int lomask = (1 << lclusterbits) - 1;
fs/erofs/zmap.c:147:    if (1 << amortizedshift == 4)
fs/erofs/zmap.c:149:    else if (1 << amortizedshift == 2 && lclusterbits == 12)
fs/erofs/zmap.c:169:            m->clusterofs = 1 << lclusterbits;
fs/erofs/zmap.c:291:    pos += lcn * (1 << amortizedshift);
fs/erofs/zmap.c:409:            m->compressedblks = 1 << (lclusterbits - LOG_BLOCK_SIZE);
fs/erofs/zmap.c:457:                              m->clusterofs != 1 << lclusterbits);
fs/erofs/zmap.c:497:    endoff = ofs & ((1 << lclusterbits) - 1);
fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:120:        ((1 << (EROFS_I_DATALAYOUT_BIT + EROFS_I_DATALAYOUT_BITS)) - 1)
fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:279:#define Z_EROFS_ALL_COMPR_ALGS          ((1 << Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_MAX) - 1)
fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:377:#define Z_EROFS_VLE_DI_PARTIAL_REF              (1 << 15)
fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:384:#define Z_EROFS_VLE_DI_D0_CBLKCNT               (1 << 11)
fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:427:                .h_clusterbits = 1 << Z_EROFS_FRAGMENT_INODE_BIT
fs/erofs/data.c:379:                    blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
fs/erofs/zdata.c:133:#define Z_EROFS_PAGE_EIO                   (1 << 30)

Thx,
Yangtao
  
Gao Xiang March 9, 2023, 8:07 a.m. UTC | #6
On 2023/3/9 15:37, Yue Hu wrote:
> On Thu,  9 Mar 2023 15:15:15 +0800
> Yangtao Li <frank.li@vivo.com> wrote:
> 
>>> @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static ssize_t erofs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>>> 		if (bdev)
>>> 			blksize_mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1;
>>> 		else
>>> -			blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
>>> +			blksize_mask = i_blocksize(inode) - 1;
>>
>> Since the mask is to be obtained here, is it more appropriate to use GENMASK(inode->i_blkbits - 1, 0)?
> 
> It should be another change independently to this patch. rt?

I'd suggest that keep to use (i_blocksize(inode) - 1) here, for example:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs.git/tree/fs/gfs2/bmap.c#n963

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
>>
>> Thx,
>> Yangtao
  
Gao Xiang March 9, 2023, 8:09 a.m. UTC | #7
On 2023/3/9 15:42, Yangtao Li wrote:
>> FYI it seems that GENMASK macro is widely used in driver and arch code base, while it's rarely used in fs, except for f2fs.
> 
> I think the following usage can be changed to bitmap api, just like in f2fs?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=c4ca1f7164734a1baf40d4ff1552172a07d4fc4d
> 
> fs/erofs/fscache.c:135:         unsigned long flags = 1 << NETFS_SREQ_ONDEMAND;
> fs/erofs/internal.h:250:#define SECTORS_PER_BLOCK       (1 << SECTORS_PER_BLOCK)
> fs/erofs/internal.h:252:#define EROFS_BLKSIZ            (1 << LOG_BLOCK_SIZE)
> fs/erofs/internal.h:354:        return (value >> bit) & ((1 << bits) - 1);
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:66:             ((1 << Z_EROFS_VLE_DI_CLUSTER_TYPE_BITS) - 1);
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:69:             m->clusterofs = 1 << vi->z_logical_clusterbits;
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:114:    const unsigned int lomask = (1 << lclusterbits) - 1;
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:141:    const unsigned int lomask = (1 << lclusterbits) - 1;
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:147:    if (1 << amortizedshift == 4)
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:149:    else if (1 << amortizedshift == 2 && lclusterbits == 12)
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:169:            m->clusterofs = 1 << lclusterbits;
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:291:    pos += lcn * (1 << amortizedshift);
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:409:            m->compressedblks = 1 << (lclusterbits - LOG_BLOCK_SIZE);
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:457:                              m->clusterofs != 1 << lclusterbits);
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:497:    endoff = ofs & ((1 << lclusterbits) - 1);
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:120:        ((1 << (EROFS_I_DATALAYOUT_BIT + EROFS_I_DATALAYOUT_BITS)) - 1)
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:279:#define Z_EROFS_ALL_COMPR_ALGS          ((1 << Z_EROFS_COMPRESSION_MAX) - 1)
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:377:#define Z_EROFS_VLE_DI_PARTIAL_REF              (1 << 15)
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:384:#define Z_EROFS_VLE_DI_D0_CBLKCNT               (1 << 11)
> fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h:427:                .h_clusterbits = 1 << Z_EROFS_FRAGMENT_INODE_BIT
> fs/erofs/data.c:379:                    blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
> fs/erofs/zdata.c:133:#define Z_EROFS_PAGE_EIO                   (1 << 30)
> 

Is there some benefit to use these? BIT(1) vs 1 << 1? also almost all
filesystems rarely use such APIs honestly.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> Thx,
> Yangtao
  
Chao Yu March 9, 2023, 2:33 p.m. UTC | #8
On 2023/3/6 15:55, Yue Hu wrote:
> From: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
> 
> linux/fs.h has a wrapper for this operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>

Thanks,
  

Patch

diff --git a/fs/erofs/data.c b/fs/erofs/data.c
index 5bd0c956a142..7e8baf56faa5 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/data.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/data.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@  static ssize_t erofs_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 		if (bdev)
 			blksize_mask = bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1;
 		else
-			blksize_mask = (1 << inode->i_blkbits) - 1;
+			blksize_mask = i_blocksize(inode) - 1;
 
 		if ((iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_count(to) |
 		     iov_iter_alignment(to)) & blksize_mask)