[RESEND] bus: imx-weim: fix branch condition evaluates to a garbage value

Message ID 20230306060505.11657-1-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru
State New
Headers
Series [RESEND] bus: imx-weim: fix branch condition evaluates to a garbage value |

Commit Message

Ivan Bornyakov March 6, 2023, 6:05 a.m. UTC
  If bus type is other than imx50_weim_devtype and have no child devices,
variable 'ret' in function weim_parse_dt() will not be initialized, but
will be used as branch condition and return value. Fix this by
initializing 'ret' with 0.

This was discovered with help of clang-analyzer, but the situation is
quite possible in real life.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/bus/imx-weim.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Fabio Estevam March 6, 2023, 11:19 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 3:05 AM Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru> wrote:
>
> If bus type is other than imx50_weim_devtype and have no child devices,
> variable 'ret' in function weim_parse_dt() will not be initialized, but
> will be used as branch condition and return value. Fix this by
> initializing 'ret' with 0.
>
> This was discovered with help of clang-analyzer, but the situation is
> quite possible in real life.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Please add a Fixes tag here.

Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
  
Ivan Bornyakov March 6, 2023, 1:10 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:05:05AM +0300, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> If bus type is other than imx50_weim_devtype and have no child devices,
> variable 'ret' in function weim_parse_dt() will not be initialized, but
> will be used as branch condition and return value. Fix this by
> initializing 'ret' with 0.
> 
> This was discovered with help of clang-analyzer, but the situation is
> quite possible in real life.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Fixes: 52c47b63412b ("bus: imx-weim: improve error handling upon child probe-failure")

Is it OK, or should I post v2 with "Fixes:" tag?

> ---
>  drivers/bus/imx-weim.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c b/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
> index 828c66bbaa67..55d917bd1f3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
> @@ -204,8 +204,8 @@ static int weim_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device(weim_id_table,
>  							   &pdev->dev);
>  	const struct imx_weim_devtype *devtype = of_id->data;
> +	int ret = 0, have_child = 0;
>  	struct device_node *child;
> -	int ret, have_child = 0;
>  	struct weim_priv *priv;
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	u32 reg;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
>
  
Fabio Estevam March 6, 2023, 1:12 p.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:10 AM Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru> wrote:

> Fixes: 52c47b63412b ("bus: imx-weim: improve error handling upon child probe-failure")
>
> Is it OK, or should I post v2 with "Fixes:" tag?

Please post a v2 with the Fixes tag and my Reviewed-by tag, thanks.
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c b/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
index 828c66bbaa67..55d917bd1f3f 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/imx-weim.c
@@ -204,8 +204,8 @@  static int weim_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	const struct of_device_id *of_id = of_match_device(weim_id_table,
 							   &pdev->dev);
 	const struct imx_weim_devtype *devtype = of_id->data;
+	int ret = 0, have_child = 0;
 	struct device_node *child;
-	int ret, have_child = 0;
 	struct weim_priv *priv;
 	void __iomem *base;
 	u32 reg;