Message ID | 20230209194825.511043-16-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:adf:eb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s9csp290552wrn; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 04:01:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8dkUZs6wBZdJDMOS2dHfJ3aNJ6dk9Dgy2Vh3Cgg6LblLZsT0S8j0nxNwzJDf2uQqIFztsD X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2448:b0:198:f027:5925 with SMTP id l8-20020a170903244800b00198f0275925mr12485023pls.64.1675944064516; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 04:01:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1675944064; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j27SvymKxav1GTkvukiFiI4liFUfoh49Xt6YBO5DFeYs+CxF2TsSzeBGfbPEOVNL0d Fl/sZs8aLB0WvF1ZPSiyGlBlMfp0xNaJ6Nq2nuKW1Bs8Qs0mideCdlT+lTm01X4n4ppg +42C1+Yoh29c7XmUEhyd6T09EkAxNge1SmdyDvipU3hsCzMHZxcefnGrJNBhuCQMpixN UyYB+ee6BHWCMBpnrolLpbwqNDPHuDluhIrRYp47xzgbZLYdwTvfa2x0cp1HTdk0i0Ea GRGTdHQtOExjCXUdaoyC+cfs5mQgK4GDdeAGJ4wTprvluMeYXfc3Qt24JSWwLnVvDFdk XRQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=btNqux62mYcL23Bq+fIieNQq4PtjIIEvkzE/bbbAp7I=; b=uWU0YjihlWOYQBWwCFJwMxNUVWR31JUmKilfkif4Mzy/o3nmn3ClWqxt+XQX8Zswxi 7LYqFsHYp/qurKP+hjV9Uw0RWsfcq/InM43e6jztgBUjzkrlOxz1mkyQOIW0nWq+c1Vx pZBay5odyWG8L246lZFQ2wvdmBDV8kwptwJaMVCBpClgpyPkW/9ZcHQuWQYR1tFPWX6a QxRmEdttcbWAoXYGHfpxIcG9vAQYhnDaIHscCv9aMIpFbboZMCnejQMUdLtTAKiCDBsE 5Ra/Z16dQ71E77X+1KbJRv6cBm6vVRoATNJYevX/tKT0LfSzoZdSKyfWQgQQAKNnM1ZG NoLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id iw6-20020a170903044600b001925dbac333si1485698plb.312.2023.02.09.04.00.49; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 04:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230472AbjBIL6A (ORCPT <rfc822;ybw1215001957@gmail.com> + 99 others); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 06:58:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59014 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229633AbjBIL4P (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 9 Feb 2023 06:56:15 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B7785C49E; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 03:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.169]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4PCFSh1nRkz4f3k5q; Thu, 9 Feb 2023 19:46:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAn3rEQ3eRjgb0tDQ--.53508S17; Thu, 09 Feb 2023 19:46:30 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 15/21] ext4: use best found when complex scan of group finishs Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 03:48:19 +0800 Message-Id: <20230209194825.511043-16-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20230209194825.511043-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20230209194825.511043-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAn3rEQ3eRjgb0tDQ--.53508S17 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Kr18ZF4rJry5XrW8Kr15urg_yoW8GrW5pr sxJF4UuryfWr1Duw47Ca13X3W5Kw4I9r18ArWIgw18WF17Z39Y9anrtry09FykJrZ5AF9x Zr4jvF4UGw47Ka7anT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBIb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUAVCq3wA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAv FVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE 3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr2 1l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv 67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IYc2 Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s02 6x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0x vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26F4j6r4UJwCI42IY 6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVC2z280aV CY1x0267AKxVW8JVW8JrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU0TqcUUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1757354722858597187?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1757354722858597187?= |
Series |
Some bugfix and cleanup to mballoc
|
|
Commit Message
Kemeng Shi
Feb. 9, 2023, 7:48 p.m. UTC
If any bex which meets bex->fe_len >= gex->fe_len is found, then it will
always be used when complex scan of group that bex belongs to finishs.
So there will not be any lock-unlock period.
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Comments
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 03:48:19AM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote: > If any bex which meets bex->fe_len >= gex->fe_len is found, then it will > always be used when complex scan of group that bex belongs to finishs. > So there will not be any lock-unlock period. > > Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> > --- > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 14 ++------------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > index e53f84de5018..c684758d6dbb 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -2019,8 +2019,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_check_limits(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); > struct ext4_free_extent *bex = &ac->ac_b_ex; > struct ext4_free_extent *gex = &ac->ac_g_ex; > - struct ext4_free_extent ex; > - int max; > > if (ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND) > return; > @@ -2039,16 +2037,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_check_limits(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > if (bex->fe_len < gex->fe_len) > return; > > - if (finish_group && bex->fe_group == e4b->bd_group) { > - /* recheck chunk's availability - we don't know > - * when it was found (within this lock-unlock > - * period or not) */ > - max = mb_find_extent(e4b, bex->fe_start, gex->fe_len, &ex); > - if (max >= gex->fe_len) { > - ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b); > - return; > - } > - } > + if (finish_group) > + ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b); > } > > /* > -- > 2.30.0 > Looks good. So when we have found bex > gex, then we wont have a lock unlock period since we always allocate the bex when we reach the end of group. Just a small typo in the commit message (finshs -> finishes), but other than that feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index e53f84de5018..c684758d6dbb 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -2019,8 +2019,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_check_limits(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); struct ext4_free_extent *bex = &ac->ac_b_ex; struct ext4_free_extent *gex = &ac->ac_g_ex; - struct ext4_free_extent ex; - int max; if (ac->ac_status == AC_STATUS_FOUND) return; @@ -2039,16 +2037,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_check_limits(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, if (bex->fe_len < gex->fe_len) return; - if (finish_group && bex->fe_group == e4b->bd_group) { - /* recheck chunk's availability - we don't know - * when it was found (within this lock-unlock - * period or not) */ - max = mb_find_extent(e4b, bex->fe_start, gex->fe_len, &ex); - if (max >= gex->fe_len) { - ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b); - return; - } - } + if (finish_group) + ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b); } /*