diff mbox series

[v3,08/24] sched/fair: Use IPCC stats to break ties between asym_packing sched groups

Message ID 20230207051105.11575-9-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
State New
Headers
Series sched: Introduce classes of tasks for load balance |

Commit Message

Ricardo Neri Feb. 7, 2023, 5:10 a.m. UTC 
  As it iterates, update_sd_pick_busiest() keeps on selecting as busiest
sched groups of identical priority. Since both groups have the same
priority, either group is a good choice. The IPCC statistics provide a
measure of the throughput before and after load balance. Use them to
pick a busiest scheduling group from otherwise identical asym_packing
scheduling groups.

Pick as busiest the scheduling group that yields a higher IPCC score
after load balancing.

Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tim C. Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes since v2:
 * None

Changes since v1:
 * Added a comment to clarify why sched_asym_prefer() needs a tie breaker
   only in update_sd_pick_busiest(). (PeterZ)
 * Renamed functions for accuracy:
   sched_asym_class_prefer() >> sched_asym_ipcc_prefer()
   sched_asym_class_pick() >> sched_asym_ipcc_pick()
 * Reworded commit message for clarity.
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index b6165aa8a376..841927b9b192 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -9345,6 +9345,60 @@  static void update_sg_lb_stats_scores(struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
 	sgs->ipcc_score_before = before;
 }
 
+/**
+ * sched_asym_ipcc_prefer - Select a sched group based on its IPCC score
+ * @a:	Load balancing statistics of a sched group
+ * @b:	Load balancing statistics of a second sched group
+ *
+ * Returns: true if @a has a higher IPCC score than @b after load balance.
+ * False otherwise.
+ */
+static bool sched_asym_ipcc_prefer(struct sg_lb_stats *a,
+				   struct sg_lb_stats *b)
+{
+	if (!sched_ipcc_enabled())
+		return false;
+
+	/* @a increases overall throughput after load balance. */
+	if (a->ipcc_score_after > b->ipcc_score_after)
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * If @a and @b yield the same overall throughput, pick @a if
+	 * its current throughput is lower than that of @b.
+	 */
+	if (a->ipcc_score_after == b->ipcc_score_after)
+		return a->ipcc_score_before < b->ipcc_score_before;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+/**
+ * sched_asym_ipcc_pick - Select a sched group based on its IPCC score
+ * @a:		A scheduling group
+ * @b:		A second scheduling group
+ * @a_stats:	Load balancing statistics of @a
+ * @b_stats:	Load balancing statistics of @b
+ *
+ * Returns: true if @a has the same priority and @a has tasks with IPC classes
+ * that yield higher overall throughput after load balance. False otherwise.
+ */
+static bool sched_asym_ipcc_pick(struct sched_group *a,
+				 struct sched_group *b,
+				 struct sg_lb_stats *a_stats,
+				 struct sg_lb_stats *b_stats)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Only use the class-specific preference selection if both sched
+	 * groups have the same priority.
+	 */
+	if (arch_asym_cpu_priority(a->asym_prefer_cpu) !=
+	    arch_asym_cpu_priority(b->asym_prefer_cpu))
+		return false;
+
+	return sched_asym_ipcc_prefer(a_stats, b_stats);
+}
+
 #else /* CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES */
 static void update_sg_lb_ipcc_stats(int dst_cpu, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
 				    struct rq *rq)
@@ -9361,6 +9415,14 @@  static void update_sg_lb_stats_scores(struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
 {
 }
 
+static bool sched_asym_ipcc_pick(struct sched_group *a,
+				 struct sched_group *b,
+				 struct sg_lb_stats *a_stats,
+				 struct sg_lb_stats *b_stats)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_IPC_CLASSES */
 
 /**
@@ -9596,6 +9658,16 @@  static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
 		/* Prefer to move from lowest priority CPU's work */
 		if (sched_asym_prefer(sg->asym_prefer_cpu, sds->busiest->asym_prefer_cpu))
 			return false;
+
+		/*
+		 * Unlike other callers of sched_asym_prefer(), here both @sg
+		 * and @sds::busiest have tasks running. When they have equal
+		 * priority, their IPC class scores can be used to select a
+		 * better busiest.
+		 */
+		if (sched_asym_ipcc_pick(sds->busiest, sg, &sds->busiest_stat, sgs))
+			return false;
+
 		break;
 
 	case group_misfit_task: