diff mbox series

[bpf-next,8/8] bpf/docs: Document how nested trusted fields may be defined

Message ID 20230119235833.2948341-9-void@manifault.com
State New
Headers
Series Enable cpumasks to be used as kptrs |

Commit Message

David Vernet Jan. 19, 2023, 11:58 p.m. UTC 
  A prior change defined a new BTF_TYPE_SAFE_NESTED macro in the verifier
which allows developers to specify when a pointee field in a struct type
should inherit its parent pointer's trusted status. This patch updates
the kfuncs documentation to specify this macro and how it can be used.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
index a74f9e74087b..560f4ede3a9f 100644
--- a/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
+++ b/Documentation/bpf/kfuncs.rst
@@ -167,7 +167,8 @@  KF_ACQUIRE and KF_RET_NULL flags.
 The KF_TRUSTED_ARGS flag is used for kfuncs taking pointer arguments. It
 indicates that the all pointer arguments are valid, and that all pointers to
 BTF objects have been passed in their unmodified form (that is, at a zero
-offset, and without having been obtained from walking another pointer).
+offset, and without having been obtained from walking another pointer, with one
+exception described below).
 
 There are two types of pointers to kernel objects which are considered "valid":
 
@@ -180,6 +181,25 @@  KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs, and may have a non-zero offset.
 The definition of "valid" pointers is subject to change at any time, and has
 absolutely no ABI stability guarantees.
 
+As mentioned above, a nested pointer obtained from walking a trusted pointer is
+no longer trusted, with one exception. If a struct type has a field that is
+guaranteed to be valid as long as its parent pointer is trusted, the
+``BTF_TYPE_SAFE_NESTED`` macro can be used to express that to the verifier as
+follows:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	BTF_TYPE_SAFE_NESTED(struct task_struct) {
+		const cpumask_t *cpus_ptr;
+	};
+
+In other words, you must:
+
+1. Wrap the trusted pointer type in the ``BTF_TYPE_SAFE_NESTED`` macro.
+
+2. Specify the type and name of the trusted nested field. This field must match
+   the field in the original type definition exactly.
+
 2.4.6 KF_SLEEPABLE flag
 -----------------------