[v4,04/19] irqdomain: Fix association race

Message ID 20230116135044.14998-5-johan+linaro@kernel.org
State New
Headers
Series irqdomain: fix mapping race and clean up locking |

Commit Message

Johan Hovold Jan. 16, 2023, 1:50 p.m. UTC
  The sanity check for an already mapped virq was done outside of the
irq_domain_mutex-protected section which meant that an (unlikely) racing
association may not be detected.

Fix this by factoring out the association implementation, which will
also be used in follow-on changes to rework the locking.

Fixes: ddaf144c61da ("irqdomain: Refactor irq_domain_associate_many()")
Tested-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Thomas Gleixner Jan. 17, 2023, 9:20 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 16 2023 at 14:50, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The sanity check for an already mapped virq was done outside of the

s/was/is/

> irq_domain_mutex-protected section which meant that an (unlikely) racing

s/meant/means/

> association may not be detected.

You describe the status quo and then correctly what the fix is:

> Fix this by factoring out the association implementation, which will
> also be used in follow-on changes to rework the locking.

Otherwise your fix fixes something which existed in the past, no?

Thanks,

        tglx
  

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index dfd60bd49109..b2087f55a1ac 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -558,8 +558,8 @@  static void irq_domain_disassociate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq)
 	irq_domain_clear_mapping(domain, hwirq);
 }
 
-int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
-			 irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+static int __irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+				  irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
 {
 	struct irq_data *irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(virq);
 	int ret;
@@ -572,7 +572,6 @@  int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 	if (WARN(irq_data->domain, "error: virq%i is already associated", virq))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
 	irq_data->hwirq = hwirq;
 	irq_data->domain = domain;
 	if (domain->ops->map) {
@@ -589,19 +588,29 @@  int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
 			}
 			irq_data->domain = NULL;
 			irq_data->hwirq = 0;
-			mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
 			return ret;
 		}
 	}
 
 	domain->mapcount++;
 	irq_domain_set_mapping(domain, hwirq, irq_data);
-	mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
 
 	irq_clear_status_flags(virq, IRQ_NOREQUEST);
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+int irq_domain_associate(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+			 irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
+	ret = __irq_domain_associate(domain, virq, hwirq);
+	mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
+
+	return ret;
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_associate);
 
 void irq_domain_associate_many(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq_base,