[09/19] ASoC: amd: ps: add support for Soundwire DMA interrupts

Message ID 20230111090222.2016499-10-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com
State New
Headers
Series [01/19] ASoC: amd: ps: create platform devices based on acp config |

Commit Message

Mukunda,Vijendar Jan. 11, 2023, 9:02 a.m. UTC
  Initialize workqueue for DMA interrupts handling.
Whenever audio data equal to the Soundwire FIFO watermark level are
produced/consumed, interrupt is generated.
Acknowledge the interrupt and schedule the workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
---
 sound/soc/amd/ps/acp63.h  |  2 +
 sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Pierre-Louis Bossart Jan. 11, 2023, 3:38 p.m. UTC | #1
> @@ -167,9 +167,11 @@ struct acp63_dev_data {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev[ACP63_DEVS];
>  	struct mutex acp_lock; /* protect shared registers */
>  	struct fwnode_handle *sdw_fw_node;
> +	struct work_struct acp_sdw_dma_work;
>  	u16 pdev_mask;
>  	u16 pdev_count;
>  	u16 pdm_dev_index;
> +	u16 dma_intr_stat[ACP63_SDW_MAX_STREAMS];

streams and DMAs are different things in SoundWire. You can have a 1:N
mapping.

>  	u8 sdw_master_count;
>  	u16 sdw0_dev_index;
>  	u16 sdw1_dev_index;
> diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
> index 0fbe5e27f3fb..5b82ee8e3ad8 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
> @@ -113,14 +113,37 @@ static int acp63_deinit(void __iomem *acp_base, struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void acp63_sdw_dma_workthread(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct acp63_dev_data *adata = container_of(work, struct acp63_dev_data,
> +						    acp_sdw_dma_work);
> +	struct sdw_dma_dev_data *sdw_dma_data;
> +	u32 stream_index;
> +	u16 pdev_index;
> +
> +	pdev_index = adata->sdw_dma_dev_index;
> +	sdw_dma_data = dev_get_drvdata(&adata->pdev[pdev_index]->dev);
> +
> +	for (stream_index = 0; stream_index < ACP63_SDW_MAX_STREAMS; stream_index++) {
> +		if (adata->dma_intr_stat[stream_index]) {
> +			if (sdw_dma_data->sdw_stream[stream_index])
> +				snd_pcm_period_elapsed(sdw_dma_data->sdw_stream[stream_index]);

is there a reason why you do this in a work thread?

IIRC we did this in SOF because of an issue where during an xrun a stop
IPC would be sent while we were dealing with an IPC.

I don't quite see why it's needed for a DMA?

What am I missing?

> +			adata->dma_intr_stat[stream_index] = 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
  
Mukunda,Vijendar Jan. 12, 2023, 10:55 a.m. UTC | #2
On 11/01/23 21:08, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
>> @@ -167,9 +167,11 @@ struct acp63_dev_data {
>>  	struct platform_device *pdev[ACP63_DEVS];
>>  	struct mutex acp_lock; /* protect shared registers */
>>  	struct fwnode_handle *sdw_fw_node;
>> +	struct work_struct acp_sdw_dma_work;
>>  	u16 pdev_mask;
>>  	u16 pdev_count;
>>  	u16 pdm_dev_index;
>> +	u16 dma_intr_stat[ACP63_SDW_MAX_STREAMS];
> streams and DMAs are different things in SoundWire. You can have a 1:N
> mapping.
>
>>  	u8 sdw_master_count;
>>  	u16 sdw0_dev_index;
>>  	u16 sdw1_dev_index;
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> index 0fbe5e27f3fb..5b82ee8e3ad8 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
>> @@ -113,14 +113,37 @@ static int acp63_deinit(void __iomem *acp_base, struct device *dev)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void acp63_sdw_dma_workthread(struct work_struct *work)
>> +{
>> +	struct acp63_dev_data *adata = container_of(work, struct acp63_dev_data,
>> +						    acp_sdw_dma_work);
>> +	struct sdw_dma_dev_data *sdw_dma_data;
>> +	u32 stream_index;
>> +	u16 pdev_index;
>> +
>> +	pdev_index = adata->sdw_dma_dev_index;
>> +	sdw_dma_data = dev_get_drvdata(&adata->pdev[pdev_index]->dev);
>> +
>> +	for (stream_index = 0; stream_index < ACP63_SDW_MAX_STREAMS; stream_index++) {
>> +		if (adata->dma_intr_stat[stream_index]) {
>> +			if (sdw_dma_data->sdw_stream[stream_index])
>> +				snd_pcm_period_elapsed(sdw_dma_data->sdw_stream[stream_index]);
> is there a reason why you do this in a work thread?
>
> IIRC we did this in SOF because of an issue where during an xrun a stop
> IPC would be sent while we were dealing with an IPC.
>
> I don't quite see why it's needed for a DMA?
>
> What am I missing?
Initially, we have used in atomic context. We have seen issues
during stream closure, in interrupt context , handling
period_elapsed causing sleep in atomic context.
To avoid that , we have declared dai_link as non-atomic and
moved period_elapsed code to work queue.
>> +			adata->dma_intr_stat[stream_index] = 0;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
  

Patch

diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/ps/acp63.h b/sound/soc/amd/ps/acp63.h
index 8963cfb6120d..833d0b5aa73d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/amd/ps/acp63.h
+++ b/sound/soc/amd/ps/acp63.h
@@ -167,9 +167,11 @@  struct acp63_dev_data {
 	struct platform_device *pdev[ACP63_DEVS];
 	struct mutex acp_lock; /* protect shared registers */
 	struct fwnode_handle *sdw_fw_node;
+	struct work_struct acp_sdw_dma_work;
 	u16 pdev_mask;
 	u16 pdev_count;
 	u16 pdm_dev_index;
+	u16 dma_intr_stat[ACP63_SDW_MAX_STREAMS];
 	u8 sdw_master_count;
 	u16 sdw0_dev_index;
 	u16 sdw1_dev_index;
diff --git a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
index 0fbe5e27f3fb..5b82ee8e3ad8 100644
--- a/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
+++ b/sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c
@@ -113,14 +113,37 @@  static int acp63_deinit(void __iomem *acp_base, struct device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void acp63_sdw_dma_workthread(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct acp63_dev_data *adata = container_of(work, struct acp63_dev_data,
+						    acp_sdw_dma_work);
+	struct sdw_dma_dev_data *sdw_dma_data;
+	u32 stream_index;
+	u16 pdev_index;
+
+	pdev_index = adata->sdw_dma_dev_index;
+	sdw_dma_data = dev_get_drvdata(&adata->pdev[pdev_index]->dev);
+
+	for (stream_index = 0; stream_index < ACP63_SDW_MAX_STREAMS; stream_index++) {
+		if (adata->dma_intr_stat[stream_index]) {
+			if (sdw_dma_data->sdw_stream[stream_index])
+				snd_pcm_period_elapsed(sdw_dma_data->sdw_stream[stream_index]);
+			adata->dma_intr_stat[stream_index] = 0;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t acp63_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct acp63_dev_data *adata;
 	struct pdm_dev_data *ps_pdm_data;
 	struct amd_sdwc_ctrl *ctrl;
 	u32 ext_intr_stat, ext_intr_stat1;
+	u32 stream_id = 0;
 	u16 irq_flag = 0;
+	u16 sdw_dma_irq_flag = 0;
 	u16 pdev_index;
+	u16 index;
 
 	adata = dev_id;
 	if (!adata)
@@ -159,7 +182,58 @@  static irqreturn_t acp63_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
 			snd_pcm_period_elapsed(ps_pdm_data->capture_stream);
 		irq_flag = 1;
 	}
-	if (irq_flag)
+	if (ext_intr_stat & ACP_SDW_DMA_IRQ_MASK) {
+		for (index = ACP_HS_RX_THRESHOLD; index <= ACP_AUDIO_TX_THRESHOLD; index++) {
+			if (ext_intr_stat & BIT(index)) {
+				acp63_writel(BIT(index),
+					     adata->acp63_base + ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_STAT);
+				switch (index) {
+				case ACP_AUDIO_TX_THRESHOLD:
+					stream_id = ACP_SDW_AUDIO_TX;
+					break;
+				case ACP_BT_TX_THRESHOLD:
+					stream_id = ACP_SDW_BT_TX;
+					break;
+				case ACP_HS_TX_THRESHOLD:
+					stream_id = ACP_SDW_HS_TX;
+					break;
+				case ACP_AUDIO_RX_THRESHOLD:
+					stream_id = ACP_SDW_AUDIO_RX;
+					break;
+				case ACP_BT_RX_THRESHOLD:
+					stream_id = ACP_SDW_BT_RX;
+					break;
+				case ACP_HS_RX_THRESHOLD:
+					stream_id = ACP_SDW_HS_RX;
+					break;
+				}
+
+				adata->dma_intr_stat[stream_id] = 1;
+				sdw_dma_irq_flag = 1;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* SDW1 BT RX */
+	if (ext_intr_stat1 & BIT(ACP_P1_BT_RX_THRESHOLD)) {
+		acp63_writel(BIT(ACP_P1_BT_RX_THRESHOLD),
+			     adata->acp63_base + ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_STAT1);
+		adata->dma_intr_stat[ACP_SDW1_BT_RX] = 1;
+		sdw_dma_irq_flag = 1;
+	}
+
+	/* SDW1 BT TX*/
+	if (ext_intr_stat1 & BIT(ACP_P1_BT_TX_THRESHOLD)) {
+		acp63_writel(BIT(ACP_P1_BT_TX_THRESHOLD),
+			     adata->acp63_base + ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_STAT1);
+		adata->dma_intr_stat[ACP_SDW1_BT_TX] = 1;
+		sdw_dma_irq_flag = 1;
+	}
+
+	if (sdw_dma_irq_flag)
+		schedule_work(&adata->acp_sdw_dma_work);
+
+	if (irq_flag || sdw_dma_irq_flag)
 		return IRQ_HANDLED;
 	else
 		return IRQ_NONE;
@@ -240,6 +314,7 @@  static int get_acp63_device_config(u32 config, struct pci_dev *pci, struct acp63
 	if (sdw_dev) {
 		is_sdw_dev = true;
 		acp_data->sdw_fw_node = acpi_fwnode_handle(sdw_dev);
+		INIT_WORK(&acp_data->acp_sdw_dma_work, acp63_sdw_dma_workthread);
 		ret = sdw_amd_scan_controller(dev);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -612,6 +687,10 @@  static void snd_acp63_remove(struct pci_dev *pci)
 	int ret, index;
 
 	adata = pci_get_drvdata(pci);
+
+	if (adata->pdev_mask & ACP63_SDW_DEV_MASK)
+		cancel_work_sync(&adata->acp_sdw_dma_work);
+
 	for (index = 0; index < adata->pdev_count; index++)
 		platform_device_unregister(adata->pdev[index]);
 	ret = acp63_deinit(adata->acp63_base, &pci->dev);