[v5,1/6] ksm: abstract the function try_to_get_old_rmap_item

Message ID 202212300912449061763@zte.com.cn
State New
Headers
Series ksm: support tracking KSM-placed zero-pages |

Commit Message

Yang Yang Dec. 30, 2022, 1:12 a.m. UTC
  From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>

A new function try_to_get_old_rmap_item is abstracted from
get_next_rmap_item. This function will be reused by the subsequent
patches about counting ksm_zero_pages.

The patch improves the readability and reusability of KSM code.

Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Xuexin Jiang <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Xiaokai Ran <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
---
 mm/ksm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  

Comments

David Hildenbrand Jan. 18, 2023, 2:03 p.m. UTC | #1
On 30.12.22 02:12, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn wrote:
> From: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
> 
> A new function try_to_get_old_rmap_item is abstracted from
> get_next_rmap_item. This function will be reused by the subsequent
> patches about counting ksm_zero_pages.
> 
> The patch improves the readability and reusability of KSM code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Xuexin Jiang <jiang.xuexin@zte.com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Xiaokai Ran <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@zte.com.cn>
> ---
>   mm/ksm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index 83e2f74ae7da..5b0a7343ff4a 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -2214,23 +2214,36 @@ static void cmp_and_merge_page(struct page *page, struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_ite
>   	}
>   }
> 
> -static struct ksm_rmap_item *get_next_rmap_item(struct ksm_mm_slot *mm_slot,
> -					    struct ksm_rmap_item **rmap_list,
> -					    unsigned long addr)
> +static struct ksm_rmap_item *try_to_get_old_rmap_item(unsigned long addr,
> +					 struct ksm_rmap_item **rmap_list)
>   {
> -	struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item;
> -
>   	while (*rmap_list) {
> -		rmap_item = *rmap_list;
> +		struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item = *rmap_list;

Empty line missing.

>   		if ((rmap_item->address & PAGE_MASK) == addr)
>   			return rmap_item;
>   		if (rmap_item->address > addr)
>   			break;
>   		*rmap_list = rmap_item->rmap_list;
> +		/* Running here indicates it's vma has been UNMERGEABLE */

"If we end up here, the VMA is UNMERGEABLE."

Although I am not sure if that is true?

>   		remove_rmap_item_from_tree(rmap_item);
>   		free_rmap_item(rmap_item);
>   	}
> 
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct ksm_rmap_item *get_next_rmap_item(struct ksm_mm_slot *mm_slot,
> +					    struct ksm_rmap_item **rmap_list,
> +					    unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item;
> +
> +	/* lookup if we have a old rmap_item matching the addr*/

I suggest dropping that comment, "try_to_get_old_rmap_item()" is 
expressive enough.

> +	rmap_item = try_to_get_old_rmap_item(addr, rmap_list);
> +	if (rmap_item)
> +		return rmap_item;
> +
> +	/* Need to allocate a new rmap_item */

I suggest dropping that comment for the same reason.

>   	rmap_item = alloc_rmap_item();
>   	if (rmap_item) {
>   		/* It has already been zeroed */
  
Yang Yang Feb. 4, 2023, 6:43 a.m. UTC | #2
Thanks for these suggestions, we will take them into patch v6.
  
David Hildenbrand Feb. 13, 2023, 12:51 p.m. UTC | #3
On 04.02.23 07:43, yang.yang29@zte.com.cn wrote:
> Thanks for these suggestions, we will take them into patch v6.

Please don't remove all context from your replies. Makes it really hard 
to follow-up :)

Further, there seems to be an issue with threading and your mails. For 
example, your cover letter [1] does not link the other patches like [2], 
for example, because the patches don't have "in-reply-to:" tags. Try 
using "git send-email", that should take care of threading automatically.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202302100915227721315@zte.com.cn/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202302100916423431376@zte.com.cn/
  

Patch

diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 83e2f74ae7da..5b0a7343ff4a 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -2214,23 +2214,36 @@  static void cmp_and_merge_page(struct page *page, struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_ite
 	}
 }

-static struct ksm_rmap_item *get_next_rmap_item(struct ksm_mm_slot *mm_slot,
-					    struct ksm_rmap_item **rmap_list,
-					    unsigned long addr)
+static struct ksm_rmap_item *try_to_get_old_rmap_item(unsigned long addr,
+					 struct ksm_rmap_item **rmap_list)
 {
-	struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item;
-
 	while (*rmap_list) {
-		rmap_item = *rmap_list;
+		struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item = *rmap_list;
 		if ((rmap_item->address & PAGE_MASK) == addr)
 			return rmap_item;
 		if (rmap_item->address > addr)
 			break;
 		*rmap_list = rmap_item->rmap_list;
+		/* Running here indicates it's vma has been UNMERGEABLE */
 		remove_rmap_item_from_tree(rmap_item);
 		free_rmap_item(rmap_item);
 	}

+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct ksm_rmap_item *get_next_rmap_item(struct ksm_mm_slot *mm_slot,
+					    struct ksm_rmap_item **rmap_list,
+					    unsigned long addr)
+{
+	struct ksm_rmap_item *rmap_item;
+
+	/* lookup if we have a old rmap_item matching the addr*/
+	rmap_item = try_to_get_old_rmap_item(addr, rmap_list);
+	if (rmap_item)
+		return rmap_item;
+
+	/* Need to allocate a new rmap_item */
 	rmap_item = alloc_rmap_item();
 	if (rmap_item) {
 		/* It has already been zeroed */