diff mbox series

x86/rapl: Treat Tigerlake like Icelake

Message ID 20221228113454.1199118-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
State New
Headers
Series x86/rapl: Treat Tigerlake like Icelake |

Commit Message

Rodrigo Vivi Dec. 28, 2022, 11:34 a.m. UTC 
  From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Since Tigerlake seems to have inherited its cstates and other rapl power
caps from Icelake, assume it also follows Icelake for its rapl events.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---

Based on the recent additions it looks like Tigerlake was a missed
case in these events/rapl.c and that this old patch from Chris is the
right way to go.

I found this patch on our drm-intel's topic/core-for-CI branch while
rebasing it towards v6.2-rc1.

 arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index a829492bca4c..ae5779ea4417 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -800,6 +800,8 @@  static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_model_match[] __initconst = {
 	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_X,		&model_hsx),
 	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(COMETLAKE_L,		&model_skl),
 	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(COMETLAKE,		&model_skl),
+	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(TIGERLAKE_L,		&model_skl),
+	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(TIGERLAKE,		&model_skl),
 	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE,		&model_skl),
 	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_L,		&model_skl),
 	X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ALDERLAKE_N,		&model_skl),