From patchwork Thu Dec 22 19:16:32 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kemeng Shi X-Patchwork-Id: 35678 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:adf:e747:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id c7csp265875wrn; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 03:18:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXsTiBRwJmXZNeJ2jV9PGjcBAqPk1fdFDr9MX4Vm8zUdPU1ZJXMABUAInbSndE0uJFsW5n4v X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a1c5:b0:7c1:2529:b25e with SMTP id bx5-20020a170906a1c500b007c12529b25emr4202405ejb.43.1671707925651; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 03:18:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1671707925; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Fqi8dzq/5/VhaAZVXxsSJuMWKrFt+4TqrnlLGp/XUgQZpNkQd3ndNImJXF99tty/Hm GapPtoaX+w+gkfzQ56u7ganV6624IqqPK9JaQzvGCXvhFyaNpuG2nJy3qPN5oSZfSicZ 9vPsT9dbP0VS4E6F5GWVA89SwBYcUPJcCHB8UA1InGCsuwhNKjcHW5+N6doMRwX+HJLP RfwKwFdmW84hMPvx4F4ekzu2zzvIN/3PXI3518g1bh0QToO7Th5KRxPBzQwl3OqUjuu8 1cf7Mvwq0DSi9EC9F/UPBWkSHn57oE7bGXwYAY+4g9Og4Hhtl/H/g0dveSEWt4FMbiMO ix6w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=B/gmWtUlgRg58hzMukEbhNpMW0tScnEK6rKbkB66S6A=; b=Ht4q+V2n3LvPqfLgg51FRWbUCX6dscrXC+ylQD8Y9GVSRN8OEjghGjWMoM2p0nXBjN U/6O7nxUeGvmB5wNdZySrZWtIr6KoOHNs3pVZiW2uGm6Dol1PTOUZPF8lMLlJV4DEoKc p6pbp0VV0REQeZigKLrlD0/zUcX5VfgmqaP5SfrCNeppVq7oGDSr//RJtotEIZlBalBp 39wLx0CZSa+diUBypn0/YrLmMFtyf0SO26gOcKbYWWMyMDg6rVCcDOWyjHrYjW3weJaW 2ZXjBQTLoMPg247e81dhGhtfActUEaGSTupipJOHpsNhw4g0e/mwV6t6CrwZ4W9zfd/a 0hpg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gt30-20020a1709072d9e00b007c118b2d91dsi329108ejc.248.2022.12.22.03.18.22; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 03:18:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235428AbiLVLR7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Dec 2022 06:17:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60986 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234961AbiLVLRu (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2022 06:17:50 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC16DFC2; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 03:17:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.169]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Nd7865v1jz4f3kL3; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:17:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Syh0CgB3a+nXPKRjMew+AQ--.3596S3; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 19:17:45 +0800 (CST) From: Kemeng Shi To: paolo.valente@linaro.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jack@suse.cz, hch@lst.de, damien.lemoal@wdc.com Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2 01/10] block, bfq: correctly raise inject limit in bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 03:16:32 +0800 Message-Id: <20221222191641.1643117-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20221222191641.1643117-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221222191641.1643117-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: Syh0CgB3a+nXPKRjMew+AQ--.3596S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7uF4xCr1xXrWruF18AF45trb_yoW8Zr1rpa y7K347C34xJF1ruF1jqa1fZFyYqan3Crnrtr13W34Fvryxur92gas2g3y5Za1fKFs3Aw4j va4UWa4q9F1YkaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBjb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M280x2IEY4vEnII2IxkI6r1a6r45M2 8IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGwA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1l8cAvFVAK 0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4 x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2 z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4 xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvY0x0EwI xGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480 Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_JF0_Jw1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7 IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxV AFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07j-Oz3UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5vklyvpphqwq5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1752912809905942947?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1752912809905942947?= Function bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection may temporarily raise inject limit to one request if current inject_limit is 0 before search of the source queue for injection. However the search below will reset inject limit to bfqd->in_service_queue which is zero for raised inject limit. Then the temporarily raised inject limit never works as expected. Assigment limit to bfqd->in_service_queue in search is needed as limit maybe overwriten to min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) for condition that a large in-flight request is on non-rotational devices in found queue. So we need to reset limit to bfqd->in_service_queue for normal case. Actually, we have already make sure bfqd->rq_in_driver is < limit before search, then -Limit is >= 1 as bfqd->rq_in_driver is >= 0. Then min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) is always 1. So we can simply check bfqd->rq_in_driver with 1 instead of result of min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit) for larget request in non-rotational device case to avoid overwritting limit and the bug is gone. -For normal case, we have already check bfqd->rq_in_driver is < limit, so we can return found bfqq unconditionally to remove unncessary check. Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi Reviewed-by: Jan Kara --- block/bfq-iosched.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index a72304c728fc..1220c41fc767 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -4641,12 +4641,10 @@ bfq_choose_bfqq_for_injection(struct bfq_data *bfqd) */ if (blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd->queue) && blk_rq_sectors(bfqq->next_rq) >= - BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT) - limit = min_t(unsigned int, 1, limit); - else - limit = in_serv_bfqq->inject_limit; - - if (bfqd->rq_in_driver < limit) { + BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT && + bfqd->rq_in_driver >= 1) + continue; + else { bfqd->rqs_injected = true; return bfqq; }