[net] seg6: selftests/bpf: fix BPF object file name in test_lwt_seg6local.sh

  The test_lwt_seg6local.c implements several eBPF programs which are
used to test the SRv6 End.BPF behavior.
Since commit afef88e65554 ("selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with
.bpf.o extension"), part of the build system and test programs loading
BPF object files are supposed to work with the .bpf.o extension.

Consequently, the test_lwt_seg6local.c is compiled into
test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o and the corresponding test_lwt_seg6local.sh
script is not updated to deal with the correct .bpf.o extension.

This patch fixes the test_lwt_seg6local.sh, using the correct .bpf.o
extension for the testing BPF object file, i.e. test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o.

Fixes: afef88e65554 ("selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with .bpf.o extension")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_seg6local.sh | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
  

Hi Andrea,

On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 03:30:44PM +0100, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> The test_lwt_seg6local.c implements several eBPF programs which are
> used to test the SRv6 End.BPF behavior.
> Since commit afef88e65554 ("selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with
> .bpf.o extension"), part of the build system and test programs loading
> BPF object files are supposed to work with the .bpf.o extension.
> 
> Consequently, the test_lwt_seg6local.c is compiled into
> test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o and the corresponding test_lwt_seg6local.sh
> script is not updated to deal with the correct .bpf.o extension.
> 
> This patch fixes the test_lwt_seg6local.sh, using the correct .bpf.o
> extension for the testing BPF object file, i.e. test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o.
> 
> Fixes: afef88e65554 ("selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with .bpf.o extension")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_seg6local.sh | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_seg6local.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_seg6local.sh
> index 826f4423ce02..bfe76ab78481 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_seg6local.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_seg6local.sh
> @@ -117,18 +117,18 @@ ip netns exec ${NS6} ip -6 addr add fb00::109/16 dev veth10 scope link
>  ip netns exec ${NS1} ip -6 addr add fb00::1/16 dev lo
>  ip netns exec ${NS1} ip -6 route add fb00::6 dev veth1 via fb00::21
>  
> -ip netns exec ${NS2} ip -6 route add fb00::6 encap bpf in obj test_lwt_seg6local.o sec encap_srh dev veth2
> +ip netns exec ${NS2} ip -6 route add fb00::6 encap bpf in obj test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o sec encap_srh dev veth2
>  ip netns exec ${NS2} ip -6 route add fd00::1 dev veth3 via fb00::43 scope link
>  
>  ip netns exec ${NS3} ip -6 route add fc42::1 dev veth5 via fb00::65
> -ip netns exec ${NS3} ip -6 route add fd00::1 encap seg6local action End.BPF endpoint obj test_lwt_seg6local.o sec add_egr_x dev veth4
> +ip netns exec ${NS3} ip -6 route add fd00::1 encap seg6local action End.BPF endpoint obj test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o sec add_egr_x dev veth4
>  
> -ip netns exec ${NS4} ip -6 route add fd00::2 encap seg6local action End.BPF endpoint obj test_lwt_seg6local.o sec pop_egr dev veth6
> +ip netns exec ${NS4} ip -6 route add fd00::2 encap seg6local action End.BPF endpoint obj test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o sec pop_egr dev veth6
>  ip netns exec ${NS4} ip -6 addr add fc42::1 dev lo
>  ip netns exec ${NS4} ip -6 route add fd00::3 dev veth7 via fb00::87
>  
>  ip netns exec ${NS5} ip -6 route add fd00::4 table 117 dev veth9 via fb00::109
> -ip netns exec ${NS5} ip -6 route add fd00::3 encap seg6local action End.BPF endpoint obj test_lwt_seg6local.o sec inspect_t dev veth8
> +ip netns exec ${NS5} ip -6 route add fd00::3 encap seg6local action End.BPF endpoint obj test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o sec inspect_t dev veth8
>  
>  ip netns exec ${NS6} ip -6 addr add fb00::6/16 dev lo
>  ip netns exec ${NS6} ip -6 addr add fd00::4/16 dev lo

The change looks good to me. Thanks for the fix.

Daniel

Acked-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
  

On 11/7/22 6:30 AM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> The test_lwt_seg6local.c implements several eBPF programs which are
> used to test the SRv6 End.BPF behavior.
> Since commit afef88e65554 ("selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with
> .bpf.o extension"), part of the build system and test programs loading
> BPF object files are supposed to work with the .bpf.o extension.
> 
> Consequently, the test_lwt_seg6local.c is compiled into
> test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o and the corresponding test_lwt_seg6local.sh
> script is not updated to deal with the correct .bpf.o extension.
> 
> This patch fixes the test_lwt_seg6local.sh, using the correct .bpf.o
> extension for the testing BPF object file, i.e. test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o.
> 
> Fixes: afef88e65554 ("selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with .bpf.o extension")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
  

On 11/7/22 6:30 AM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> The test_lwt_seg6local.c implements several eBPF programs which are
> used to test the SRv6 End.BPF behavior.
> Since commit afef88e65554 ("selftests/bpf: Store BPF object files with
> .bpf.o extension"), part of the build system and test programs loading
> BPF object files are supposed to work with the .bpf.o extension.
> 
> Consequently, the test_lwt_seg6local.c is compiled into
> test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o and the corresponding test_lwt_seg6local.sh
> script is not updated to deal with the correct .bpf.o extension.
> 
> This patch fixes the test_lwt_seg6local.sh, using the correct .bpf.o
> extension for the testing BPF object file, i.e. test_lwt_seg6local.bpf.o.

This has already been fixed in
commit 98af3746026c ("selftests/bpf: fix missing BPF object files") in bpf-next.