[1/2] usb: ehci-pci: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS

Message ID 20221028141821.1.I9a5353f81d1509f85f3a04f0cdc9099f6fe60811@changeid
State New
Headers
Series [1/2] usb: ehci-pci: Set PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS |

Commit Message

Brian Norris Oct. 28, 2022, 9:19 p.m. UTC
  This driver often takes on the order of 8ms to start, but every little
bit counts. It shouldn't have many cross-device dependencies to
race with, nor racy access to shared state with other drivers, so this
should be a relatively low risk change.

This driver was pinpointed as part of a survey of top slowest initcalls
(i.e., are built in, and probing synchronously) on a lab of ChromeOS
systems.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---

 drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Alan Stern Oct. 29, 2022, 1:13 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 02:19:07PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> This driver often takes on the order of 8ms to start, but every little
> bit counts. It shouldn't have many cross-device dependencies to
> race with, nor racy access to shared state with other drivers, so this
> should be a relatively low risk change.
> 
> This driver was pinpointed as part of a survey of top slowest initcalls
> (i.e., are built in, and probing synchronously) on a lab of ChromeOS
> systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

However, I'm curious to know why this patch makes ehci-pci use 
PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS even when CONFIG_PM isn't set, whereas the 2/2 
patch makes xhci-pci use PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS only when CONFIG_PM 
is set.

Alan Stern

>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> index 17f8b6ea0c35..4b148fe5e43b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
> @@ -411,11 +411,12 @@ static struct pci_driver ehci_pci_driver = {
>  	.remove =	ehci_pci_remove,
>  	.shutdown = 	usb_hcd_pci_shutdown,
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>  	.driver =	{
> -		.pm =	&usb_hcd_pci_pm_ops
> -	},
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +		.pm =	&usb_hcd_pci_pm_ops,
>  #endif
> +		.probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
> +	},
>  };
>  
>  static int __init ehci_pci_init(void)
> -- 
> 2.38.1.273.g43a17bfeac-goog
>
  
Brian Norris Oct. 29, 2022, 1:44 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:13:14PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> However, I'm curious to know why this patch makes ehci-pci use 
> PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS even when CONFIG_PM isn't set, whereas the 2/2 
> patch makes xhci-pci use PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS only when CONFIG_PM 
> is set.

That's definitely a bug in patch 2. This has nothing (or, little; probe
order can technically affect the PM suspend/resume order) to do with
CONFIG_PM, except that the .pm hooks tend to sit nearby, and repeated
driver patching makes the author's eyes glaze over sometimes...

Thanks. v2 coming.

Brian
  

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
index 17f8b6ea0c35..4b148fe5e43b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c
@@ -411,11 +411,12 @@  static struct pci_driver ehci_pci_driver = {
 	.remove =	ehci_pci_remove,
 	.shutdown = 	usb_hcd_pci_shutdown,
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
 	.driver =	{
-		.pm =	&usb_hcd_pci_pm_ops
-	},
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+		.pm =	&usb_hcd_pci_pm_ops,
 #endif
+		.probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
+	},
 };
 
 static int __init ehci_pci_init(void)