From patchwork Mon Oct 24 11:29:32 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 8747 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a5d:6687:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id l7csp428544wru; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 05:36:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4evhtbx5G7JnBk4tG54pqCqg/Qjss0YIbwaS0B2H+2oQR4IYci122YOnWMe23cFamhmPHr X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9b87:b0:733:1795:2855 with SMTP id dd7-20020a1709069b8700b0073317952855mr27479723ejc.156.1666614978135; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 05:36:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666614978; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FYMC+gJCxX5IhDe6Z3+v8yIlhgSn+WgDZ2Tdmv3upatOrGoCAEKgeYfrhZIAsBjfvp Ty5g70CpNPBmc6jfNtPhK5oui++F134L2LNrRdQLLiULeqNLuervWabnF/Lcq/bDkwyE ciemGrE4GZgkYW1sm2o7B9mXhfP+/VnXXxqePXczi9ti8AeumXFz1v0zRZ4sGI1tmzCJ o2NxcXMDOYFLA98GKoyGu3s61lSrU3QtTlS9NRTQzSV6rfEbszqOFxWKsdiGoorqz3Oi cvP4fK/P1uhVasul0a0HyTq0SItvyK6wxowkD0oYbgVngq7f/gM6zpjmsrU14eKvJLw9 BH6g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=gY+XvzL7AtoHdksVNSa0lDj4SD23lcILqtuYgW/a1qk=; b=cvKg8ENlG0D7mhRsJE0KmKVMyeYuSY2QItDbUgGUyS+ScuINKrHwAHHbFubjWLKfiU uqSwjwkYdUOLLKl1R7YHZ+HWjYLjAMWdC2NnZow49tsP23whtB30iTcCnSr/du7QM+R3 g53J9I5lM8dz92p3Whz/y0WvEeDCKaKGVgjCh6BgH3L352bTLSsUY56M+FM/z5ml+r+E Ax2z5sSv05v6bYvqUQU7B2kmVn0L7ILoJlYX6BHrg2jBp0TNcaoCosT7CIHyHk/UkbIQ a/XpTga6Aycm90c87JJqNSAIMnR0KEC+bxY/iYLWHbnd4vgop9ENk6LjPjiXVHkS3Y3C qidQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=wwkxBBdV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f30-20020a170906739e00b007829f6fed9dsi18023806ejl.232.2022.10.24.05.35.51; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 05:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=wwkxBBdV; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233645AbiJXM1I (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:27:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60536 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230439AbiJXM0o (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:26:44 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9D158EB5; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 05:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA22361291; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:58:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06E55C433D6; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:58:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1666612690; bh=aOvtxZzoxLZvYMnqDsCHT9AR35HDLsRHaZZOOkdNEaQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wwkxBBdVYz6Gen91Jqhbiu0pv7glKyU0m+xuZEUjvhCKq6EYK2+sjt4eb6UsDqsMH DB4wxsteOIXrM1LlsPWL4dhwsUZpXqHAnk8t6ZHvBm5Ym6p7bNE0KY+cULLMkJuG22 KXXCLyd/AGKx/Tu5R71CceEBpS09IiPJPEW4VGGg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Bjorn Helgaas Subject: [PATCH 4.19 053/229] PCI: Sanitise firmware BAR assignments behind a PCI-PCI bridge Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:29:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20221024113000.792508891@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221024112959.085534368@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20221024112959.085534368@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1747572467257659166?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1747572467257659166?= From: Maciej W. Rozycki commit 0e32818397426a688f598f35d3bc762eca6d7592 upstream. When pci_assign_resource() is unable to assign resources to a BAR, it uses pci_revert_fw_address() to fall back to a firmware assignment (if any). Previously pci_revert_fw_address() assumed all addresses could reach the device, but this is not true if the device is below a bridge that only forwards addresses within its windows. This problem was observed on a Tyan Tomcat IV S1564D system where the BIOS did not assign valid addresses to several bridges and USB devices: pci 0000:00:11.0: PCI-to-PCIe bridge to [bus 01-ff] pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff] pci 0000:01:00.0: PCIe Upstream Port to [bus 02-ff] pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable pci 0000:02:02.0: PCIe Downstream Port to [bus 05-ff] pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable pci 0000:05:00.0: PCIe-to-PCI bridge to [bus 06-ff] pci 0000:05:00.0: bridge window [io 0x0000-0x0fff] # unreachable pci 0000:06:08.0: USB UHCI 1.1 pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # unreachable pci 0000:06:08.1: USB UHCI 1.1 pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # unreachable pci 0000:06:08.0: can't claim BAR 4 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]: no compatible bridge window pci 0000:06:08.1: can't claim BAR 4 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff]: no compatible bridge window During the first pass of assigning unassigned resources, there was not enough I/O space available, so we couldn't assign the 06:08.0 BAR and reverted to the firmware assignment (still unreachable). Reverting the 06:08.1 assignment failed because it conflicted with 06:08.0: pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff] pci 0000:01:00.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x2000] pci 0000:02:02.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x1000] pci 0000:05:00.0: no space for bridge window [io size 0x1000] pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: no space for [io size 0x0020] pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: trying firmware assignment [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: no space for [io size 0x0020] pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: trying firmware assignment [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] conflicts with 0000:06:08.0 [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] A subsequent pass assigned valid bridge windows and a valid 06:08.1 BAR, but left the 06:08.0 BAR alone, so the UHCI device was still unusable: pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0xe000-0xefff] released pci 0000:00:11.0: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x2fff] # reassigned pci 0000:01:00.0: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x2fff] # reassigned pci 0000:02:02.0: bridge window [io 0x2000-0x2fff] # reassigned pci 0000:05:00.0: bridge window [io 0x2000-0x2fff] # reassigned pci 0000:06:08.0: BAR 4: assigned [io 0xfce0-0xfcff] # left alone pci 0000:06:08.1: BAR 4: assigned [io 0x2000-0x201f] ... uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host system error, PCI problems? uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host controller process error, something bad happened! uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: host controller halted, very bad! uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: HCRESET not completed yet! uhci_hcd 0000:06:08.0: HC died; cleaning up If the address assigned by firmware is not reachable because it's not within upstream bridge windows, fail instead of assigning the unusable address from firmware. [bhelgaas: commit log, use pci_upstream_bridge()] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16263 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2203012338460.46819@angie.orcam.me.uk Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2209211921250.29493@angie.orcam.me.uk Fixes: 58c84eda0756 ("PCI: fall back to original BIOS BAR addresses") Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6.35+ Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/pci/setup-res.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c @@ -209,6 +209,17 @@ static int pci_revert_fw_address(struct root = pci_find_parent_resource(dev, res); if (!root) { + /* + * If dev is behind a bridge, accesses will only reach it + * if res is inside the relevant bridge window. + */ + if (pci_upstream_bridge(dev)) + return -ENXIO; + + /* + * On the root bus, assume the host bridge will forward + * everything. + */ if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) root = &ioport_resource; else