From patchwork Sat Oct 22 07:28:43 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 7719 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a5d:4242:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s2csp1109886wrr; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 01:50:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5sDKaSf0PB53yrNp9MannBxioeLhVvPM3W3306/QJGGqzRVDIYVBBc9QRW7RyL7WBuMpWD X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:6296:b0:787:d066:9fcf with SMTP id nd22-20020a170907629600b00787d0669fcfmr18185269ejc.692.1666428625551; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 01:50:25 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1666428625; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=d9TMQ1NoOnK2r3ye6iST13zYeeo5zfzGo52lxHW+195wtkS3yn5PkH3t8kQytoMhIV ehHJgyjrBYaJddkDIEXfsD31BKk1imKyL2sXMh/UOyLH/l9yhVAXpcUctdp8tyNKbFHG +3cjqHYm65crSHh00TkJgHeeiI1W3ANGQnjmqztqFGQyFYD3rL2QkHQtrOuDNX6O08XO lT1WLJrpFzmaBXU7RffnyBwzwByG72oJAPCPsok/l96wQgsc4gjY9/VwvzTsa3gSU0sZ H6YqILGaZe76mrwC7iusc/7njFpFtLtLm7B7f4RWG/DuSksQpWhNxEa5L9CF2FhkrdTh KP/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=OMtXJ+eEuP4kibItUUryVP57CSD3RDZJ9K/PMH4Uce0=; b=nU4GnBbECrqsMvkvpyt5mef/fUXJpdBejeVxyf6wBu5XsI+wFxjjZgcXynnyufoIdl z15ixjD/jOXg8fGCe9KNQw5hXTJAKniqCjG2AekvK356j0fTzikXQ5fxQFcEJDpMhejX Uw5TC8sBV6XqkcrDj9EDQZmPkjFB/V6oVURi24NEdteHb6OGJ95Rl61VLtcuhG2ugIGU FPgpKhqDodhkodF5uX6wvvgoHY1E/cCjrk8+yEneWCcNH9GKxfLnhuHEXLRzOb2KO8jb 5HJhwIfjvb+xUI/AOUj3F6xvmQG333jj0osoVxZzvdRlM9yFTLtON+mMlIXS/0FBXLJp h88Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=MS0XXYfx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l9-20020a1709061c4900b00787af558937si18096463ejg.313.2022.10.22.01.50.01; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 01:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=MS0XXYfx; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234377AbiJVIsg (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 04:48:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45836 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235388AbiJVIp0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2022 04:45:26 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88DF832AA9; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 01:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 080D5B82E15; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EFB8C433D6; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 08:04:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1666425875; bh=utvZx2zyUFJMYQMIX7YK1QsEzU1Uj+lHms/CgOf1vGE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MS0XXYfxUe+bf9I5/+0F3+4ijy5C3wdoEMORDnFWpPC1nMlgoxOtoWobJHaKvTmkK q68ckC29ASgB1PbVrcj+0TUj2o+YcLt9DLgcbjzcCqP2dgLlMV+c93H1OWXxcC7fTt TuCkgUMTzmwcqVlg2h/5chP437yXwNJh/zNj/2rY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo , David Sterba , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.19 644/717] btrfs: scrub: try to fix super block errors Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 09:28:43 +0200 Message-Id: <20221022072526.931023131@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.38.1 In-Reply-To: <20221022072415.034382448@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20221022072415.034382448@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.67 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1747377062454890077?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1747377062454890077?= From: Qu Wenruo [ Upstream commit f9eab5f0bba76742af654f33d517bf62a0db8f12 ] [BUG] The following script shows that, although scrub can detect super block errors, it never tries to fix it: mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 -m raid1 $dev1 $dev2 xfs_io -c "pwrite 67108864 4k" $dev2 mount $dev1 $mnt btrfs scrub start -B $dev2 btrfs scrub start -Br $dev2 umount $mnt The first scrub reports the super error correctly: scrub done for f3289218-abd3-41ac-a630-202f766c0859 Scrub started: Tue Aug 2 14:44:11 2022 Status: finished Duration: 0:00:00 Total to scrub: 1.26GiB Rate: 0.00B/s Error summary: super=1 Corrected: 0 Uncorrectable: 0 Unverified: 0 But the second read-only scrub still reports the same super error: Scrub started: Tue Aug 2 14:44:11 2022 Status: finished Duration: 0:00:00 Total to scrub: 1.26GiB Rate: 0.00B/s Error summary: super=1 Corrected: 0 Uncorrectable: 0 Unverified: 0 [CAUSE] The comments already shows that super block can be easily fixed by committing a transaction: /* * If we find an error in a super block, we just report it. * They will get written with the next transaction commit * anyway */ But the truth is, such assumption is not always true, and since scrub should try to repair every error it found (except for read-only scrub), we should really actively commit a transaction to fix this. [FIX] Just commit a transaction if we found any super block errors, after everything else is done. We cannot do this just after scrub_supers(), as btrfs_commit_transaction() will try to pause and wait for the running scrub, thus we can not call it with scrub_lock hold. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/scrub.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c index f62bfa023178..a14f97bf2a40 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/scrub.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/scrub.c @@ -4112,6 +4112,7 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start, int ret; struct btrfs_device *dev; unsigned int nofs_flag; + bool need_commit = false; if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info)) return -EAGAIN; @@ -4215,6 +4216,12 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start, */ nofs_flag = memalloc_nofs_save(); if (!is_dev_replace) { + u64 old_super_errors; + + spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); + old_super_errors = sctx->stat.super_errors; + spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock); + btrfs_info(fs_info, "scrub: started on devid %llu", devid); /* * by holding device list mutex, we can @@ -4223,6 +4230,16 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start, mutex_lock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex); ret = scrub_supers(sctx, dev); mutex_unlock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex); + + spin_lock(&sctx->stat_lock); + /* + * Super block errors found, but we can not commit transaction + * at current context, since btrfs_commit_transaction() needs + * to pause the current running scrub (hold by ourselves). + */ + if (sctx->stat.super_errors > old_super_errors && !sctx->readonly) + need_commit = true; + spin_unlock(&sctx->stat_lock); } if (!ret) @@ -4249,6 +4266,25 @@ int btrfs_scrub_dev(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 devid, u64 start, scrub_workers_put(fs_info); scrub_put_ctx(sctx); + /* + * We found some super block errors before, now try to force a + * transaction commit, as scrub has finished. + */ + if (need_commit) { + struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans; + + trans = btrfs_start_transaction(fs_info->tree_root, 0); + if (IS_ERR(trans)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(trans); + btrfs_err(fs_info, + "scrub: failed to start transaction to fix super block errors: %d", ret); + return ret; + } + ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans); + if (ret < 0) + btrfs_err(fs_info, + "scrub: failed to commit transaction to fix super block errors: %d", ret); + } return ret; out: scrub_workers_put(fs_info);