[linux-next] fs/super.c: use strscpy() is more robust and safer
Commit Message
From: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
---
fs/super.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 03:09:15AM +0000, cuijinpeng666@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
>
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jinpeng Cui <cui.jinpeng2@zte.com.cn>
Please ignore based on this response:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y1EVnZS9BalesrC1@kroah.com
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ struct super_block *sget_fc(struct fs_context *fc,
fc->s_fs_info = NULL;
s->s_type = fc->fs_type;
s->s_iflags |= fc->s_iflags;
- strlcpy(s->s_id, s->s_type->name, sizeof(s->s_id));
+ strscpy(s->s_id, s->s_type->name, sizeof(s->s_id));
list_add_tail(&s->s_list, &super_blocks);
hlist_add_head(&s->s_instances, &s->s_type->fs_supers);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ struct super_block *sget(struct file_system_type *type,
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
s->s_type = type;
- strlcpy(s->s_id, type->name, sizeof(s->s_id));
+ strscpy(s->s_id, type->name, sizeof(s->s_id));
list_add_tail(&s->s_list, &super_blocks);
hlist_add_head(&s->s_instances, &type->fs_supers);
spin_unlock(&sb_lock);