diff mbox series

[rcu,8/8] rcu: Fix __this_cpu_read() lockdep warning in rcu_force_quiescent_state()

Message ID 20221019224659.2499511-8-paulmck@kernel.org
State New
Headers
Series Miscellaneous fixes for v6.2 |

Commit Message

Paul E. McKenney Oct. 19, 2022, 10:46 p.m. UTC 
  From: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>

Running rcutorture with non-zero fqs_duration module parameter in a
kernel built with CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y results in the following splat:

BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000]
code: rcu_torture_fqs/398
caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
CPU: 3 PID: 398 Comm: rcu_torture_fqs Not tainted 6.0.0-rc1-yoctodev-standard+
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x86
dump_stack+0x10/0x16
check_preemption_disabled+0xe5/0xf0
__this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x20
rcu_force_quiescent_state.part.0+0x1c/0x170
rcu_force_quiescent_state+0x1e/0x30
rcu_torture_fqs+0xca/0x160
? rcu_torture_boost+0x430/0x430
kthread+0x192/0x1d0
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x30/0x30
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>

The problem is that rcu_force_quiescent_state() uses __this_cpu_read()
in preemptible code instead of the proper raw_cpu_read().  This commit
therefore changes __this_cpu_read() to raw_cpu_read().

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index f6561aa401c04..1e1d333d07ffe 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2410,7 +2410,7 @@  void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
 
 	/* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
-	rnp = __this_cpu_read(rcu_data.mynode);
+	rnp = raw_cpu_read(rcu_data.mynode);
 	for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
 		ret = (READ_ONCE(rcu_state.gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
 		       !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);