On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:56:10PM +0200, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> index 8f3d76c751dd..c6b938c01a74 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static void br_switchdev_fdb_populate(struct net_bridge *br,
> item->added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
> item->offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags);
> item->is_local = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags);
> + item->locked = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags);
Shouldn't this be set to 0 here, since it is the bridge->driver
direction?
> item->info.dev = (!p || item->is_local) ? br->dev : p->dev;
> item->info.ctx = ctx;
> }
> --
> 2.34.1
>
On 2022-10-20 14:55, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:56:10PM +0200, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> index 8f3d76c751dd..c6b938c01a74 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static void br_switchdev_fdb_populate(struct
>> net_bridge *br,
>> item->added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
>> item->offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags);
>> item->is_local = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags);
>> + item->locked = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags);
>
> Shouldn't this be set to 0 here, since it is the bridge->driver
> direction?
>
Wouldn't it be a good idea to allow drivers to add what corresponds to a
blackhole
entry when using the bridge input chain to activate the MAB feature, or
in general
to leave the decision of what to do to the driver implementation?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 09:29:06PM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote:
> On 2022-10-20 14:55, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 06:56:10PM +0200, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
> > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> > > index 8f3d76c751dd..c6b938c01a74 100644
> > > --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> > > @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static void br_switchdev_fdb_populate(struct
> > > net_bridge *br,
> > > item->added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
> > > item->offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags);
> > > item->is_local = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags);
> > > + item->locked = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags);
> >
> > Shouldn't this be set to 0 here, since it is the bridge->driver
> > direction?
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to allow drivers to add what corresponds to a blackhole
> entry when using the bridge input chain to activate the MAB feature, or in general
> to leave the decision of what to do to the driver implementation?
The patch doesn't propose that. It proposes:
| net: bridge: enable bridge to install locked fdb entries from drivers
|
| The bridge will be able to install locked entries when receiving
| SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE notifications from drivers.
Please write patches which make just one logical change, and explain the
justification for that change and precisely that change in the commit
message.
@@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info {
u16 vid;
u8 added_by_user:1,
is_local:1,
+ locked:1,
offloaded:1;
};
@@ -165,8 +165,8 @@ static int br_switchdev_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
switch (event) {
case SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE:
fdb_info = ptr;
- err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, fdb_info->addr,
- fdb_info->vid, false);
+ err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, fdb_info->addr, fdb_info->vid,
+ fdb_info->locked, false);
if (err) {
err = notifier_from_errno(err);
break;
@@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ static int __br_fdb_add(struct ndmsg *ndm, struct net_bridge *br,
"FDB entry towards bridge must be permanent");
return -EINVAL;
}
- err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, true);
+ err = br_fdb_external_learn_add(br, p, addr, vid, false, true);
} else {
spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
err = fdb_add_entry(br, p, addr, ndm, nlh_flags, vid, ext_flags, nfea_tb);
@@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ void br_fdb_unsync_static(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p)
}
int br_fdb_external_learn_add(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
- const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
+ const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid, bool locked,
bool swdev_notify)
{
struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb;
@@ -1421,6 +1421,9 @@ int br_fdb_external_learn_add(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
if (!p)
flags |= BIT(BR_FDB_LOCAL);
+ if (locked)
+ flags |= BIT(BR_FDB_LOCKED);
+
fdb = fdb_create(br, p, addr, vid, flags);
if (!fdb) {
err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1444,6 +1447,11 @@ int br_fdb_external_learn_add(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
modified = true;
}
+ if (locked != test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags)) {
+ change_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags);
+ modified = true;
+ }
+
if (swdev_notify)
set_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ int br_fdb_sync_static(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p);
void br_fdb_unsync_static(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p);
int br_fdb_external_learn_add(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
- bool swdev_notify);
+ bool locked, bool swdev_notify);
int br_fdb_external_learn_del(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
bool swdev_notify);
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static void br_switchdev_fdb_populate(struct net_bridge *br,
item->added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
item->offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags);
item->is_local = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags);
+ item->locked = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb->flags);
item->info.dev = (!p || item->is_local) ? br->dev : p->dev;
item->info.ctx = ctx;
}