From patchwork Thu Feb 29 00:54:45 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fan Wu X-Patchwork-Id: 208119 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7301:2097:b0:108:e6aa:91d0 with SMTP id gs23csp102382dyb; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:58:29 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCWNKBkNiGJG+36M2xh3ltrQGMXcKi4tLnca7z1rKLrxYVYig/aSUeKrkwK32uzYzoQ434f+4JBJF1eYj4R5qZLtJbcDOA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGgPKV9QXqBAakABXl3XQndznIUKNlXIPu7J3JSlQsmpWDE5UNREUpoBOWjzP8Fnsxit9iM X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f6cb:0:b0:690:46b7:e027 with SMTP id d11-20020a0cf6cb000000b0069046b7e027mr577855qvo.10.1709168308849; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:58:28 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1709168308; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ACIm8RrxrZBNyhlTg2+aOJ89PJfJD3fJsaSTPmzk+LPl16vz11Qzq7cr5PFrJre31D tQ6eD939bKPAOORVA8VsgWBVHl1iU0Sd+1lo+KNhIBlkWxOc2GsNYFdVKWZBlD3QxHt5 f5nK5ZGCkGqSNmzQLUlQWmVL5YHQVyKOPSwzqUuQYqF7q217Cs5wj7KE7Q835lPWCN+X Q5htzGJKKPJ2Lh6587daXh4GEsLnrmoE+P+hPm6WohGeYsQTTOTKyehYgiPFB73R6zCu jhvDSDPSVE+dvOmJz3RWpzWmNuzb3xqn8519Ec1FWnbA7cxPADQEL9Dq3u346gz8pyFT abxw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature :dkim-filter; bh=HFneUDC8Z8Dzy3b48RYvWYU96HA+vpivC93Ukb00udk=; fh=Q42/clUBOZrwwSqzjyRTOGm2jeCjyUvOMLmpjCF4fbE=; b=wzqSWAJIhLqjoapx/YsCmwHWMHXNcTisK2fKjW59jEhrITd+ZI426di8A8V2XMKSRt 7INy5xlGZq8SYGSM8Vpy0dc95QXWpulkYhVaLLhLtGaqFOqUy0QjwGRQ/Vc7mTcW9Gap X98gGo+3nxCExbRJZ7ScQlstjTsjFKy9nwO7ekCPMWIeDL39Hc/6hfKy02XD89UxuQSl OK0NxIdh7oF9I9EtA4TTdzmR41pqGhHstSCqg7atohkMDn6bPNaTxFDPcuNBS3pd4gxb 7TQAQq1mPKuCZYgeoF54cD+GGuKPGY6jszSB0P/RxymYV7Lc2PPk76MM9LW8ly8fYG+a vN7g==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=VaeyjUDc; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linux.microsoft.com dkim=pass dkdomain=linux.microsoft.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.microsoft.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-85942-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-85942-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gh6-20020a05621429c600b0068f08ce8109si298886qvb.505.2024.02.28.16.58.28 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:58:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-85942-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.s=default header.b=VaeyjUDc; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=linux.microsoft.com dkim=pass dkdomain=linux.microsoft.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=linux.microsoft.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-85942-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-85942-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81E441C23F35 for ; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0633744C9D; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:55:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="VaeyjUDc" Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B955F2C856; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 00:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709168121; cv=none; b=jtB/mvuWAE7gl6Au+jORpQ4T0elTTXugxBnaAXtiEX2QsJBX/6uv+mGK3ZrFNEE20a/5tmZSBBSjMG1l8CztIY26avSUKD74jfoeX2fF3I1z5DI4wlr2XxfcLKisjg7uakqDHapJkjUqh1/tRgpdTrsJ/IeZj3yprBwNjTcpf4s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709168121; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EDo5RTtPeuCmWwByqD0kigCW6lb+mDj+rRRl1BJXMoU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References; b=huaT5/pf/f+0aDIVx0bLUS3LkrmPxPU6W177c8bWEJYhUGfwpotvIBjd8jA4uH/K/nE3RpQvplh+uT4+HSVgXhcV3dN/cyaCoyAX1Tjr9KJcnZ8ICjopjUg/G50tkua//Xi53Nl+Tz2DjPWQtD56aucaX/YBw7ljTkK10QCZG7g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b=VaeyjUDc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=13.77.154.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.microsoft.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.microsoft.com Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1052) id 8BDCC20B74C5; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:55:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 8BDCC20B74C5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1709168118; bh=HFneUDC8Z8Dzy3b48RYvWYU96HA+vpivC93Ukb00udk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VaeyjUDc+8JO4rPJ7hesRJoJksglcnozafZKfBahk6zuyIG+QRWSyE+tKnQvxTnaH Ayl4NCvWI1kr9hog/zpSl9jtmfYwzlQgmBqAGBAptUfY3VB892TGccF7+zPhuIxsYl Edptdjhq0lGodpRzH/Iu5ov0L4Q/puX05ZpY+kkQ= From: Fan Wu To: corbet@lwn.net, zohar@linux.ibm.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, tytso@mit.edu, ebiggers@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, eparis@redhat.com, paul@paul-moore.com Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, audit@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Deven Bowers , Fan Wu Subject: [RFC PATCH v13 03/20] ipe: add evaluation loop Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 16:54:45 -0800 Message-Id: <1709168102-7677-4-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1709168102-7677-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1709168102-7677-1-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1792192868941945914 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1792192868941945914 From: Deven Bowers IPE must have a centralized function to evaluate incoming callers against IPE's policy. This iteration of the policy for against the rules for that specific caller is known as the evaluation loop. Signed-off-by: Deven Bowers Signed-off-by: Fan Wu --- v2: + Split evaluation loop, access control hooks, and evaluation loop from policy parser and userspace interface to pass mailing list character limit v3: + Move ipe_load_properties to patch 04. + Remove useless 0-initializations Prefix extern variables with ipe_ + Remove kernel module parameters, as these are exposed through sysctls. + Add more prose to the IPE base config option help text. + Use GFP_KERNEL for audit_log_start. + Remove unnecessary caching system. + Remove comments from headers + Use rcu_access_pointer for rcu-pointer null check + Remove usage of reqprot; use prot only. +Move policy load and activation audit event to 03/12 v4: + Remove sysctls in favor of securityfs nodes + Re-add kernel module parameters, as these are now exposed through securityfs. + Refactor property audit loop to a separate function. v5: + fix minor grammatical errors + do not group rule by curly-brace in audit record, + reconstruct the exact rule. v6: + No changes v7: + Further split lsm creation into a separate commit from the evaluation loop and audit system, for easier review. + Propagating changes to support the new ipe_context structure in the evaluation loop. v8: + Remove ipe_hook enumeration; hooks can be correlated via syscall record. v9: + Remove ipe_context related code and simplify the evaluation loop. v10: + Split eval part and boot_verified part v11: + Fix code style issues v12: + Correct an rcu_read_unlock usage + Add a WARN to unknown op during evaluation v13: + No changes --- security/ipe/Makefile | 1 + security/ipe/eval.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ security/ipe/eval.h | 24 ++++++++++ 3 files changed, 125 insertions(+) create mode 100644 security/ipe/eval.c create mode 100644 security/ipe/eval.h diff --git a/security/ipe/Makefile b/security/ipe/Makefile index c09aec4904f2..57fe922cf1fc 100644 --- a/security/ipe/Makefile +++ b/security/ipe/Makefile @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ # obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_IPE) += \ + eval.o \ ipe.o \ policy.o \ policy_parser.o \ diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.c b/security/ipe/eval.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..af56815ed0fa --- /dev/null +++ b/security/ipe/eval.c @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#include "ipe.h" +#include "eval.h" +#include "policy.h" + +struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy; + +/** + * evaluate_property - Analyze @ctx against a property. + * @ctx: Supplies a pointer to the context to be evaluated. + * @p: Supplies a pointer to the property to be evaluated. + * + * Return: + * * true - The current @ctx match the @p + * * false - The current @ctx doesn't match the @p + */ +static bool evaluate_property(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx, + struct ipe_prop *p) +{ + return false; +} + +/** + * ipe_evaluate_event - Analyze @ctx against the current active policy. + * @ctx: Supplies a pointer to the context to be evaluated. + * + * This is the loop where all policy evaluation happens against IPE policy. + * + * Return: + * * 0 - OK + * * -EACCES - @ctx did not pass evaluation. + * * !0 - Error + */ +int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx) +{ + bool match = false; + enum ipe_action_type action; + struct ipe_policy *pol = NULL; + const struct ipe_rule *rule = NULL; + const struct ipe_op_table *rules = NULL; + struct ipe_prop *prop = NULL; + + rcu_read_lock(); + + pol = rcu_dereference(ipe_active_policy); + if (!pol) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return 0; + } + + if (ctx->op == IPE_OP_INVALID) { + if (pol->parsed->global_default_action == IPE_ACTION_DENY) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return -EACCES; + } + if (pol->parsed->global_default_action == IPE_ACTION_INVALID) + WARN(1, "no default rule set for unknown op, ALLOW it"); + rcu_read_unlock(); + return 0; + } + + rules = &pol->parsed->rules[ctx->op]; + + list_for_each_entry(rule, &rules->rules, next) { + match = true; + + list_for_each_entry(prop, &rule->props, next) { + match = evaluate_property(ctx, prop); + if (!match) + break; + } + + if (match) + break; + } + + if (match) + action = rule->action; + else if (rules->default_action != IPE_ACTION_INVALID) + action = rules->default_action; + else + action = pol->parsed->global_default_action; + + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (action == IPE_ACTION_DENY) + return -EACCES; + + return 0; +} diff --git a/security/ipe/eval.h b/security/ipe/eval.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6b434515968f --- /dev/null +++ b/security/ipe/eval.h @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. + */ + +#ifndef _IPE_EVAL_H +#define _IPE_EVAL_H + +#include +#include + +#include "policy.h" + +extern struct ipe_policy __rcu *ipe_active_policy; + +struct ipe_eval_ctx { + enum ipe_op_type op; + + const struct file *file; +}; + +int ipe_evaluate_event(const struct ipe_eval_ctx *const ctx); + +#endif /* _IPE_EVAL_H */