diff mbox series

[tip:,x86/mtrr] x86/mtrr: Have only one set_mtrr() variant

Message ID 168597409590.404.1718981891238519233.tip-bot2@tip-bot2
State New
Headers
Series [tip:,x86/mtrr] x86/mtrr: Have only one set_mtrr() variant |

Commit Message

tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner June 5, 2023, 2:08 p.m. UTC 
  The following commit has been merged into the x86/mtrr branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     34cf2d19552bbe3b72b34fc859a19cd5070c466a
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/34cf2d19552bbe3b72b34fc859a19cd5070c466a
Author:        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 02 May 2023 14:09:22 +02:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
CommitterDate: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 15:04:32 +02:00

x86/mtrr: Have only one set_mtrr() variant

Today there are two variants of set_mtrr(): one calling stop_machine()
and one calling stop_machine_cpuslocked().

The first one (set_mtrr()) has only one caller, and this caller is
running only when resuming from suspend when the interrupts are still
off and only one CPU is active. Additionally this code is used only on
rather old 32-bit CPUs not supporting SMP.

For these reasons the first variant can be replaced by a simple call of
mtrr_if->set().

Rename the second variant set_mtrr_cpuslocked() to set_mtrr() now that
there is only one variant left, in order to have a shorter function
name.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230502120931.20719-8-jgross@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c | 28 ++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
index 85113af..007ecca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/mtrr.c
@@ -173,20 +173,8 @@  static inline int types_compatible(mtrr_type type1, mtrr_type type2)
  * Note that the mechanism is the same for UP systems, too; all the SMP stuff
  * becomes nops.
  */
-static void
-set_mtrr(unsigned int reg, unsigned long base, unsigned long size, mtrr_type type)
-{
-	struct set_mtrr_data data = { .smp_reg = reg,
-				      .smp_base = base,
-				      .smp_size = size,
-				      .smp_type = type
-				    };
-
-	stop_machine(mtrr_rendezvous_handler, &data, cpu_online_mask);
-}
-
-static void set_mtrr_cpuslocked(unsigned int reg, unsigned long base,
-				unsigned long size, mtrr_type type)
+static void set_mtrr(unsigned int reg, unsigned long base, unsigned long size,
+		     mtrr_type type)
 {
 	struct set_mtrr_data data = { .smp_reg = reg,
 				      .smp_base = base,
@@ -316,7 +304,7 @@  int mtrr_add_page(unsigned long base, unsigned long size,
 	/* Search for an empty MTRR */
 	i = mtrr_if->get_free_region(base, size, replace);
 	if (i >= 0) {
-		set_mtrr_cpuslocked(i, base, size, type);
+		set_mtrr(i, base, size, type);
 		if (likely(replace < 0)) {
 			mtrr_usage_table[i] = 1;
 		} else {
@@ -324,7 +312,7 @@  int mtrr_add_page(unsigned long base, unsigned long size,
 			if (increment)
 				mtrr_usage_table[i]++;
 			if (unlikely(replace != i)) {
-				set_mtrr_cpuslocked(replace, 0, 0, 0);
+				set_mtrr(replace, 0, 0, 0);
 				mtrr_usage_table[replace] = 0;
 			}
 		}
@@ -452,7 +440,7 @@  int mtrr_del_page(int reg, unsigned long base, unsigned long size)
 		goto out;
 	}
 	if (--mtrr_usage_table[reg] < 1)
-		set_mtrr_cpuslocked(reg, 0, 0, 0);
+		set_mtrr(reg, 0, 0, 0);
 	error = reg;
  out:
 	mutex_unlock(&mtrr_mutex);
@@ -582,9 +570,9 @@  static void mtrr_restore(void)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_var_ranges; i++) {
 		if (mtrr_value[i].lsize) {
-			set_mtrr(i, mtrr_value[i].lbase,
-				    mtrr_value[i].lsize,
-				    mtrr_value[i].ltype);
+			mtrr_if->set(i, mtrr_value[i].lbase,
+				     mtrr_value[i].lsize,
+				     mtrr_value[i].ltype);
 		}
 	}
 }