diff mbox series

[1/1] swiotlb: Fix debugfs reporting of reserved memory pools

Message ID 1681400250-2032-1-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com
State New
Headers
Series [1/1] swiotlb: Fix debugfs reporting of reserved memory pools |

Commit Message

Michael Kelley (LINUX) April 13, 2023, 3:37 p.m. UTC 
  For io_tlb_nslabs, the debugfs code reports the correct value for a
specific reserved memory pool.  But for io_tlb_used, the value reported
is always for the default pool, not the specific reserved pool. Fix this.

Fixes: 5c850d31880e ("swiotlb: fix passing local variable to debugfs_create_ulong()")
Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
---

I don't have a way to test this directly with OF reserved memory, but I
cobbled together a hack to call rmem_swiotlb_device_init() multiple times
for different size reserved pools. I verified that reserved pool debugfs entries
are created as expected and that the value of io_tlb_used is *not* the value
from the default pool.

 kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Petr Tesařík April 13, 2023, 6:52 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:37:30 -0700
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com> wrote:

> For io_tlb_nslabs, the debugfs code reports the correct value for a
> specific reserved memory pool.  But for io_tlb_used, the value reported
> is always for the default pool, not the specific reserved pool. Fix this.
> 
> Fixes: 5c850d31880e ("swiotlb: fix passing local variable to debugfs_create_ulong()")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
> ---
> 
> I don't have a way to test this directly with OF reserved memory, but I
> cobbled together a hack to call rmem_swiotlb_device_init() multiple times
> for different size reserved pools. I verified that reserved pool debugfs entries
> are created as expected and that the value of io_tlb_used is *not* the value
> from the default pool.

Yeah, the only in-tree user is Mediatek Asurada, and I don't have one
either...

The patch looks good to me. But you know, I'm now well-known for
breaking things because of insufficient testing. ;-)

Petr T

>  kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index dac42a2..db43de82 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -930,7 +930,9 @@ bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev)
>  
>  static int io_tlb_used_get(void *data, u64 *val)
>  {
> -	*val = mem_used(&io_tlb_default_mem);
> +	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = data;
> +
> +	*val = mem_used(mem);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_io_tlb_used, io_tlb_used_get, NULL,
> "%llu\n"); @@ -943,7 +945,7 @@ static void
> swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(struct io_tlb_mem *mem, return;
>  
>  	debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_nslabs", 0400, mem->debugfs,
> &mem->nslabs);
> -	debugfs_create_file("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, NULL,
> +	debugfs_create_file("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, mem,
>  			&fops_io_tlb_used);
>  }
>
Christoph Hellwig April 16, 2023, 6:26 a.m. UTC | #2 
Thanks,

applied to the dma-mapping for-next tree.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index dac42a2..db43de82 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -930,7 +930,9 @@  bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev)
 
 static int io_tlb_used_get(void *data, u64 *val)
 {
-	*val = mem_used(&io_tlb_default_mem);
+	struct io_tlb_mem *mem = data;
+
+	*val = mem_used(mem);
 	return 0;
 }
 DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(fops_io_tlb_used, io_tlb_used_get, NULL, "%llu\n");
@@ -943,7 +945,7 @@  static void swiotlb_create_debugfs_files(struct io_tlb_mem *mem,
 		return;
 
 	debugfs_create_ulong("io_tlb_nslabs", 0400, mem->debugfs, &mem->nslabs);
-	debugfs_create_file("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, NULL,
+	debugfs_create_file("io_tlb_used", 0400, mem->debugfs, mem,
 			&fops_io_tlb_used);
 }