diff mbox series

[tip:,x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Pass the microcode revision to print_ucode_info() directly

Message ID 167431286787.4906.11043739743543659187.tip-bot2@tip-bot2
State New
Headers
Series [tip:,x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Pass the microcode revision to print_ucode_info() directly |

Commit Message

tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner Jan. 21, 2023, 2:54 p.m. UTC 
  The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     174f1b909ab0984e5369a634971fb14a618ca797
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/174f1b909ab0984e5369a634971fb14a618ca797
Author:        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:35:53 -08:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 14:55:20 +01:00

x86/microcode/intel: Pass the microcode revision to print_ucode_info() directly

print_ucode_info() takes a struct ucode_cpu_info pointer as parameter.
Its sole purpose is to print the microcode revision.

The only available ucode_cpu_info always describes the currently loaded
microcode revision. After a microcode update is successful, this is the
new revision, or on failure it is the original revision.

In preparation for future changes, replace the struct ucode_cpu_info
pointer parameter with a plain integer which contains the revision
number and adjust the call sites accordingly.

No functional change.

  [ bp:
    - Fix + cleanup commit message.
    - Revert arbitrary, unrelated change.
  ]

Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230120161923.118882-5-ashok.raj@intel.com
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 30 +++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index cac2bdb..9dbd007 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -308,11 +308,10 @@  static bool load_builtin_intel_microcode(struct cpio_data *cp)
 /*
  * Print ucode update info.
  */
-static void
-print_ucode_info(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, unsigned int date)
+static void print_ucode_info(unsigned int new_rev, unsigned int date)
 {
 	pr_info_once("microcode updated early to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
-		     uci->cpu_sig.rev,
+		     new_rev,
 		     date & 0xffff,
 		     date >> 24,
 		     (date >> 16) & 0xff);
@@ -332,7 +331,7 @@  void show_ucode_info_early(void)
 
 	if (delay_ucode_info) {
 		intel_cpu_collect_info(&uci);
-		print_ucode_info(&uci, current_mc_date);
+		print_ucode_info(uci.cpu_sig.rev, current_mc_date);
 		delay_ucode_info = 0;
 	}
 }
@@ -341,33 +340,22 @@  void show_ucode_info_early(void)
  * At this point, we can not call printk() yet. Delay printing microcode info in
  * show_ucode_info_early() until printk() works.
  */
-static void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+static void print_ucode(int new_rev, int date)
 {
-	struct microcode_intel *mc;
 	int *delay_ucode_info_p;
 	int *current_mc_date_p;
 
-	mc = uci->mc;
-	if (!mc)
-		return;
-
 	delay_ucode_info_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&delay_ucode_info);
 	current_mc_date_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&current_mc_date);
 
 	*delay_ucode_info_p = 1;
-	*current_mc_date_p = mc->hdr.date;
+	*current_mc_date_p = date;
 }
 #else
 
-static inline void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
+static inline void print_ucode(int new_rev, int date)
 {
-	struct microcode_intel *mc;
-
-	mc = uci->mc;
-	if (!mc)
-		return;
-
-	print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
+	print_ucode_info(new_rev, date);
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -407,9 +395,9 @@  static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
 	uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
 
 	if (early)
-		print_ucode(uci);
+		print_ucode(uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
 	else
-		print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
+		print_ucode_info(uci->cpu_sig.rev, mc->hdr.date);
 
 	return 0;
 }