trace/kprobe: remove duplicated call of ring_buffer_event_data

Message ID 1666077186-6042-1-git-send-email-chensong_2000@189.cn
State New
Headers
Series trace/kprobe: remove duplicated call of ring_buffer_event_data |

Commit Message

Song Chen Oct. 18, 2022, 7:13 a.m. UTC
  Function __kprobe_trace_func calls ring_buffer_event_data to get
a ring buffer, however, it has been done in above call
trace_event_buffer_reserve.

So remove one of them.

Signed-off-by: Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
  

Comments

Steven Rostedt Oct. 18, 2022, 1:59 p.m. UTC | #1
[ Added Masami who's the new co-maintainer, and this is his code ]

On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:13:06 +0800
Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn> wrote:

> Function __kprobe_trace_func calls ring_buffer_event_data to get
> a ring buffer, however, it has been done in above call
> trace_event_buffer_reserve.
> 
> So remove one of them.
> 

May as well add:

Fixes: 5e6cd84e2f8bd ("tracing/kprobes: Do not open code event reserve logic")

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve


> Signed-off-by: Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> index 23f7f0ec4f4c..dfd5809a4a65 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -1394,7 +1394,6 @@ __kprobe_trace_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct pt_regs *regs,
>  		return;
>  
>  	fbuffer.regs = regs;
> -	entry = fbuffer.entry = ring_buffer_event_data(fbuffer.event);
>  	entry->ip = (unsigned long)tk->rp.kp.addr;
>  	store_trace_args(&entry[1], &tk->tp, regs, sizeof(*entry), dsize);
>
  
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Oct. 18, 2022, 3:22 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi,

On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:59:32 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> 
> [ Added Masami who's the new co-maintainer, and this is his code ]
> 
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:13:06 +0800
> Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn> wrote:
> 
> > Function __kprobe_trace_func calls ring_buffer_event_data to get
> > a ring buffer, however, it has been done in above call
> > trace_event_buffer_reserve.
> > 
> > So remove one of them.
> > 
> 
> May as well add:
> 
> Fixes: 5e6cd84e2f8bd ("tracing/kprobes: Do not open code event reserve logic")
> 
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Oops, and we have another line in __kretprobe_trace_func() too.

Song, can you update this patch to fix the __kretprobe_trace_func() too?

Thank you,

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > index 23f7f0ec4f4c..dfd5809a4a65 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > @@ -1394,7 +1394,6 @@ __kprobe_trace_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct pt_regs *regs,
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	fbuffer.regs = regs;
> > -	entry = fbuffer.entry = ring_buffer_event_data(fbuffer.event);
> >  	entry->ip = (unsigned long)tk->rp.kp.addr;
> >  	store_trace_args(&entry[1], &tk->tp, regs, sizeof(*entry), dsize);
> >  
>
  
Song Chen Oct. 19, 2022, 1:27 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi,

在 2022/10/18 23:22, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) 写道:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:59:32 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
>>
>> [ Added Masami who's the new co-maintainer, and this is his code ]
>>
>> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:13:06 +0800
>> Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn> wrote:
>>
>>> Function __kprobe_trace_func calls ring_buffer_event_data to get
>>> a ring buffer, however, it has been done in above call
>>> trace_event_buffer_reserve.
>>>
>>> So remove one of them.
>>>
>>
>> May as well add:
>>
>> Fixes: 5e6cd84e2f8bd ("tracing/kprobes: Do not open code event reserve logic")
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> Oops, and we have another line in __kretprobe_trace_func() too.
> 
> Song, can you update this patch to fix the __kretprobe_trace_func() too?
> 
> Thank you,
> 

will do

Song
>>
>> -- Steve
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Song Chen <chensong_2000@189.cn>
>>> ---
>>>   kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 1 -
>>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
>>> index 23f7f0ec4f4c..dfd5809a4a65 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
>>> @@ -1394,7 +1394,6 @@ __kprobe_trace_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct pt_regs *regs,
>>>   		return;
>>>   
>>>   	fbuffer.regs = regs;
>>> -	entry = fbuffer.entry = ring_buffer_event_data(fbuffer.event);
>>>   	entry->ip = (unsigned long)tk->rp.kp.addr;
>>>   	store_trace_args(&entry[1], &tk->tp, regs, sizeof(*entry), dsize);
>>>   
>>
> 
>
  

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index 23f7f0ec4f4c..dfd5809a4a65 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -1394,7 +1394,6 @@  __kprobe_trace_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct pt_regs *regs,
 		return;
 
 	fbuffer.regs = regs;
-	entry = fbuffer.entry = ring_buffer_event_data(fbuffer.event);
 	entry->ip = (unsigned long)tk->rp.kp.addr;
 	store_trace_args(&entry[1], &tk->tp, regs, sizeof(*entry), dsize);