[v2,00/15] allow run with minimal kernel config

Message ID cover.1688078604.git.falcon@tinylab.org
Headers
Series allow run with minimal kernel config |

Message

Zhangjin Wu June 29, 2023, 11:22 p.m. UTC
  Willy, Thomas

This is v2 to allow run with minimal kernel config, see v1 [1].

It mainly applied the suggestions from Thomas. It is based on our
previous v5 sysret helper series [2] and Thomas' chmod_net removal
patchset [3].

Now, a test report on arm/vexpress-a9 without procfs, shmem, tmpfs, net
and memfd_create looks like:

    LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9:

    14 chmod_net                                                    [SKIPPED]
    15 chmod_self                                                   [SKIPPED]
    17 chown_self                                                   [SKIPPED]
    41 link_cross                                                   [SKIPPED]
    0 -fstackprotector not supported                                [SKIPPED]

    139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed.
    See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log

    LOG: testing summary:

         arch/board | result
        ------------|------------
    arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log

Changes from v1 --> v2:

* selftests/nolibc: stat_fault: silence NULL argument warning with glibc
  selftests/nolibc: gettid: restore for glibc and musl
  selftests/nolibc: add _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE for musl
  selftests/nolibc: add a new rmdir() test case
  selftests/nolibc: fix up failures when CONFIG_PROC_FS=n

    The same as v1, only a few of commit message changes.

* selftests/nolibc: fix up int_fast16/32_t test cases for musl

    Applied the method suggested by Thomas, two new macros are added to
    get SINT_MAX_OF_TYPE(type) and SINT_MIN_OF_TYPE(type).

* selftests/nolibc: fix up kernel parameters support

    After discuss with Thomas and with more tests, both of argv[1] and
    NOLIBC_TEST environment variable should be verified to support
    such kernel parameters:

      NOLIBC_TEST=syscall
      noapic NOLIBC_TEST=syscall
      noapic

* selftests/nolibc: stat_timestamps: remove procfs dependency

    Add '/init' and '/' for !procfs, don't skip it.

* selftests/nolibc: link_cross: use /proc/self/cmdline

    Use /proc/self/cmdline instead of /proc/self/net, the ramfs based
    /tmp/file doesn't work as expected (not really crossdev).

* tools/nolibc: add rmdir() support

    Now, rebased on __sysret() from sysret helper patchset [2].

* selftests/nolibc: prepare /tmp for tmpfs or ramfs

    Removed the hugetlbfs prepare part, not really required.

    Don't remove /tmp and reserve it to use ramfs as tmpfs.

* selftests/nolibc: add common get_tmpfile()
  selftests/nolibc: rename chroot_exe to chroot_tmpfile

    Some cleanups.

* selftests/nolibc: add chmod_tmpfile test

    To avoid conflict with Thomas' chmod_net removal patch [3], a new
    chmod_tmpfile is added (in v1, there is a rename patch from
    chmod_net to chmod_good)

    Still to avoid conflict, these two are removed in this series:

    - selftests/nolibc: rename proc variable to has_proc
    - selftests/nolibc: rename euid0 variable to is_root

* selftests/nolibc: vfprintf: remove MEMFD_CREATE dependency

    Many checks are removed, only reserve the direct tmpfs access
    version.

Best regards,
Zhangjin
---
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1687344643.git.falcon@tinylab.org/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1687976753.git.falcon@tinylab.org/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230624-proc-net-setattr-v1-0-73176812adee@weissschuh.net/

Zhangjin Wu (15):
  selftests/nolibc: stat_fault: silence NULL argument warning with glibc
  selftests/nolibc: gettid: restore for glibc and musl
  selftests/nolibc: add _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE for musl
  selftests/nolibc: fix up int_fast16/32_t test cases for musl
  selftests/nolibc: fix up kernel parameters support
  selftests/nolibc: stat_timestamps: remove procfs dependency
  selftests/nolibc: link_cross: use /proc/self/cmdline
  tools/nolibc: add rmdir() support
  selftests/nolibc: add a new rmdir() test case
  selftests/nolibc: fix up failures when CONFIG_PROC_FS=n
  selftests/nolibc: prepare /tmp for tmpfs or ramfs
  selftests/nolibc: add common get_tmpfile()
  selftests/nolibc: rename chroot_exe to chroot_tmpfile
  selftests/nolibc: add chmod_tmpfile test
  selftests/nolibc: vfprintf: remove MEMFD_CREATE dependency

 tools/include/nolibc/sys.h                   |  22 ++++
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 102 +++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Thomas Weißschuh June 30, 2023, 8:50 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2023-06-30 07:22:39+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Willy, Thomas
> 
> This is v2 to allow run with minimal kernel config, see v1 [1].
> 
> It mainly applied the suggestions from Thomas. It is based on our
> previous v5 sysret helper series [2] and Thomas' chmod_net removal
> patchset [3].
> 
> Now, a test report on arm/vexpress-a9 without procfs, shmem, tmpfs, net
> and memfd_create looks like:
> 
>     LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9:
> 
>     14 chmod_net                                                    [SKIPPED]

Shouldn't this be gone?

>     15 chmod_self                                                   [SKIPPED]
>     17 chown_self                                                   [SKIPPED]
>     41 link_cross                                                   [SKIPPED]
>     0 -fstackprotector not supported                                [SKIPPED]
> 
>     139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed.
>     See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log
> 
>     LOG: testing summary:
> 
>          arch/board | result
>         ------------|------------
>     arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log

> [..]

>  tools/include/nolibc/sys.h                   |  22 ++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 102 +++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

A few nitpicks left, mentioned on the patches themselves.

In general: for the full series.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
  
Zhangjin Wu June 30, 2023, 12:04 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi, Thomas

> On 2023-06-30 07:22:39+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > Willy, Thomas
> > 
> > This is v2 to allow run with minimal kernel config, see v1 [1].
> > 
> > It mainly applied the suggestions from Thomas. It is based on our
> > previous v5 sysret helper series [2] and Thomas' chmod_net removal
> > patchset [3].
> > 
> > Now, a test report on arm/vexpress-a9 without procfs, shmem, tmpfs, net
> > and memfd_create looks like:
> > 
> >     LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9:
> > 
> >     14 chmod_net                                                    [SKIPPED]
> 
> Shouldn't this be gone?
>

Yes, if apply your chmod_net removal patches before this series:

    LOG: testing report for arm/vexpress-a9:

    14 chmod_self                                                   [SKIPPED]
    16 chown_self                                                   [SKIPPED]
    40 link_cross                                                   [SKIPPED]
    0 -fstackprotector not supported                                [SKIPPED]

    139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed.
    See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log

    LOG: testing summary:

         arch/board | result
        ------------|------------
    arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log

This test also applied the new proposed chroot_exe and chmod_tmpfile
from https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230630111433.211130-1-falcon@tinylab.org/

> >     15 chmod_self                                                   [SKIPPED]
> >     17 chown_self                                                   [SKIPPED]
> >     41 link_cross                                                   [SKIPPED]
> >     0 -fstackprotector not supported                                [SKIPPED]
> > 
> >     139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed.
> >     See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log
> > 
> >     LOG: testing summary:
> > 
> >          arch/board | result
> >         ------------|------------
> >     arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 5 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /labs/linux-lab/logging/nolibc/arm-vexpress-a9-nolibc-test.log
> 
> > [..]
> 
> >  tools/include/nolibc/sys.h                   |  22 ++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 102 +++++++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> A few nitpicks left, mentioned on the patches themselves.
> 
> In general: for the full series.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
> 

Thanks Thomas, will send v3 later.

Best regards,
Zhangjin