Message ID | 20240227151115.4623-1-puranjay12@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel+bounces-83480-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7300:a81b:b0:108:e6aa:91d0 with SMTP id bq27csp2763698dyb; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:17:06 -0800 (PST) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3; AJvYcCWmw5zHpmwm8uaOyusnaGsYe0/Z+8BIso2a4ALdraqkxGPhy1BB7cxE4kMh67LXFU97rsjnrblC6bQRRo9an1RQqu7vcQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEPOl3/dD0b/74SuKgf6ZbNgUGiqsMEwcAsvNhL4wFJWn9M9u88JD3dJHL9t0OGVXMyfaPt X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:1743:b0:1a0:fab6:41d0 with SMTP id nw3-20020a056a21174300b001a0fab641d0mr2793593pzb.42.1709047026586; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:17:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1709047026; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fG4CI0doEKQIu1ExzsnIEIBv33DWi18NDYtqqqE7vXqtkpBFM/QKrhpbN8NhIP4xqX tUlu7EPrfrH82C9XqieFo1Qeuirbv8+svhi+nqfKy/dIyx7UEYXuvHT0GobmeaR7Lyg+ QVt8PAfMnuWsEdEciUlSi3gtOujT7ph5WfVbCtXxpLoxKvPrREQnd63DC+jUHHepdrNS bWR4U4nPBkog0H0Q4lUlYWIWh/5Aj6QFBaTlpLe2eKNy2d6xbTblqY7fBHGt0Zg2xNx0 Vwk6NqGG9jikJnTiZ1wMgXvBRqA+Q2751xwKo8atPmkd2YvLkGLjIgPK+fqsKr2N86KI fb7g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=Pfgf6iCOs5FvWaw1ia5k8xLHc6e2QjcjYzqDMduTgxk=; fh=7zs2mUpdQaK7IdcO62YVEKrv5HRuyw8NIwTJH/hNBUA=; b=DbmQsa/oiaFz1LtbPoVs04U0nlqlTGQcA2ShBlfgHTC5d7Hyacsxl6qVr4HghMYpwz SW4eqObrn+nDbqcMgp4dMd74ONJDbd2cIMIPi9QBS2PHOok7TNoJQEnIjHtVoZXHidYY n4xGbOzRHq14T7YpRlN7OCx/9Y8LxR+NbT7G4FpFxvEOglDmlKTqxzRQ1jn80WmgysxN CX6yft2mJdO9p9/lNogKUiWEvi9sEfaErMWszUO8wmLAW9IS88jbImKBLaXJP30dM1Ov EuI8IEbN8YVWbrT1+5qOr/42ZQazv4PjaPWFKHIMG20HU8aDx5KASvs22v/TmvulJe4M QtjA==; dara=google.com ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=MunjGpUr; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-83480-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-83480-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u23-20020a634557000000b005e438e94d35si5666259pgk.2.2024.02.27.07.17.06 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:17:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-83480-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=MunjGpUr; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=gmail.com dkim=pass dkdomain=gmail.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=gmail.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-83480-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-83480-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D8D28DD5E for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9752C145FF3; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="MunjGpUr" Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com (mail-wr1-f53.google.com [209.85.221.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766D913B2B3; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.53 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709046703; cv=none; b=sQEGGBUXM+3WTw5L7hk7eCgPFwO2fXK6h/KsyqudLFo6QfWw54GZ4z2ZVg0SDVgrSMKXHbRlQtffDes3i4tLZ9M4y4O3KZU2FOsI17M/FxUBaqq7XYueqrFVan+ymZ1BOlIwsl125LbmtyIryrznZ8b0fjoryeBYCKgLBMcH0YI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709046703; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GvUIZKcHHKBnQQAaTnEtyLTv8orDMf6CA4/PYxI3DNU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=Fa0wh8t0oHxSY2jZY1UEIp3HLQ5ujNVWJNODmvp1whyN27Pc1PcD+roZu56GvobO8UTr2r3Xuk7adarH8K6YDcj+OfMEBgf/ArHL1gon2zI0p1zO8zu6DizlNpm9uuv2PbaC0rC6Swptl0liXi82gJU3tjPin82pFtf03kVfr0Y= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=MunjGpUr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33d7b8f563eso3550962f8f.0; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:11:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709046700; x=1709651500; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Pfgf6iCOs5FvWaw1ia5k8xLHc6e2QjcjYzqDMduTgxk=; b=MunjGpUrxVjbiwTVwc6tlysycYjTTjRE+vS7YafEKRas0/O1EBZkcJULaVWyoVvp1j 7y4ZdAAUeXTRrEV6ahg/DwWpAMaApaGIN7B4KafQE+tVaEwE5F/xq6caA0BY3nM9MPF1 C2w9xW7mVG0lIrbX8YaJzuLKxS0eg2RZ6OLnqElUBOf+nIJaNbdVpy5NccSw/ItnDx2E Vl7zIbsBaGtc1ScGyBnUGJTxKV6s58tBIhoeJoBT1f5WyKcYevbNaeaDLfXswX70M5vo usmoL52XYQTjO6ZJ5TA4Rl5MVhoRTYWi0lftAYsnyOfOBpFYjlLUfnVy3SjZpKnYdrJS pkrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709046700; x=1709651500; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Pfgf6iCOs5FvWaw1ia5k8xLHc6e2QjcjYzqDMduTgxk=; b=A9g42Yhh2Wzzgjk+35iZB7ZNKiaJnXPQDXO61ZJ+aOHhdXbUlLOtu90gPt/AD1vLo8 s6PJAmHORaQ1eomQURjdK+aSXhgCWyk8jiJEFASUbTE1Bp4KNl3feFnz0NVE9dHaXl09 62gKTUBk6i675/9YOF8Rnioab+hHSdoQWkWtzJBONxzDp9AD+9vfTsPkaVicp6yfrSjd Yt8YLgmaMrjA+XFfHwyzYUoAZsRKcZocfb8T68gkM+KqwTXgpWtSic2ugG/MusYLCy04 oPHoCU8yoHdVmHU8cfQlTykJDImV45QsK2HXx4SdtlB6UC0UFwsOe75xuNkWQcBXnaMP 0P6w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVWaAKPxW+iVotQn15wP2qzMqharHSzssnsGjBkpxxvIxhxus6hnQMBMq5QVVKTfatTVYzt1NxJa0F2hL0Vo5NIv3xTP9miizMnydQg52q8B+fTxm/Ss4sZPMLP99miB6UQ X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxZV+XEWscYAju6hlX3Ml/64sLk3eFBdHiEFDNdeQU0L1rFI+Bh 8sOZlyN5zYBhi7C7V0P9wn31y++ynH/+8XDCxUsoglJ241vuAlLQ X-Received: by 2002:adf:f390:0:b0:33d:afbc:6c76 with SMTP id m16-20020adff390000000b0033dafbc6c76mr8159783wro.1.1709046699465; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:11:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (54-240-197-231.amazon.com. [54.240.197.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w10-20020adff9ca000000b0033d1b760125sm11751556wrr.92.2024.02.27.07.11.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:11:38 -0800 (PST) From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list), bpf@vger.kernel.org (open list:BPF [GENERAL] (Safe Dynamic Programs and Tools)), Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> Cc: puranjay12@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/1] Support kCFI + BPF on arm64 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 15:11:14 +0000 Message-Id: <20240227151115.4623-1-puranjay12@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1792065694740382889 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1792065694740382889 |
Series |
Support kCFI + BPF on arm64
|
|
Message
Puranjay Mohan
Feb. 27, 2024, 3:11 p.m. UTC
On ARM64 with CONFIG_CFI_CLANG, CFI warnings can be triggered by running the bpf selftests. This is because the JIT doesn't emit proper CFI prologues for BPF programs, callbacks, and struct_ops trampolines. Example Warning: CFI failure at bpf_rbtree_add_impl+0x120/0x1d4 (target: bpf_prog_fb8b097ab47d164a_less+0x0/0x98; expected type: 0x9e4709a9) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1488 at bpf_rbtree_add_impl+0x120/0x1d4 Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) virtio_net net_failover failover aes_ce_blk aes_ce_cipher ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64 sha1_ce virtio_mmio uio_pdrv_genirq uio dm_mod dax configfs [last unloaded: bpf_testmod(OE)] CPU: 0 PID: 1488 Comm: new_name Tainted: P OE 6.8.0-rc1+ #1 Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) pstate: 204000c5 (nzCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : bpf_rbtree_add_impl+0x120/0x1d4 lr : bpf_prog_234260f1d6227155_rbtree_first_and_remove+0x218/0x438 sp : ffff80008444bb10 x29: ffff80008444bb10 x28: ffff80008444bbf0 x27: ffff80008444bb60 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000010 x24: 0000000000000008 x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffff00000ab71658 x21: ffff8000843dd5fc x20: ffff00000ab459f0 x19: ffff00000ab71358 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 000000009e4709a9 x16: 00000000d4202000 x15: 0000aaaadf15e420 x14: 0000000000004007 x13: ffff800084448000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: dead00000000eb9f x10: ffff00000ab71370 x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff00000ab71658 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff00000ab71658 x0 : ffff00000ab71358 Call trace: bpf_rbtree_add_impl+0x120/0x1d4 bpf_prog_234260f1d6227155_rbtree_first_and_remove+0x218/0x438 bpf_test_run+0x190/0x358 bpf_prog_test_run_skb+0x354/0x460 bpf_prog_test_run+0x128/0x164 __sys_bpf+0x364/0x428 __arm64_sys_bpf+0x30/0x44 invoke_syscall+0x64/0x128 el0_svc_common+0xb4/0xe8 do_el0_svc+0x28/0x34 el0_svc+0x58/0x108 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x90/0xfc el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1ac irq event stamp: 35493817 hardirqs last enabled at (35493816): [<ffff8000802e4268>] unit_alloc+0x110/0x1b0 hardirqs last disabled at (35493817): [<ffff8000802ad35c>] bpf_spin_lock+0x2c/0xec softirqs last enabled at (35493688): [<ffff800080275934>] bpf_ksym_add+0x164/0x184 softirqs last disabled at (35493810): [<ffff800080cd9ac8>] local_bh_disable+0x4/0x30 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- This patch fixes the prologue and trampoline generation code to emit the KCFI hash before the expected branch targets. The KCFI hashes are generated at compile time and are unique to function prototypes. To allow the JIT to find these hashes at runtime, the following behaviour of the compiler is used: Two function prototypes are declared, one for BPF programs and another for callbacks: extern unsigned int __bpf_prog_runX(const void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn); extern u64 __bpf_callback_fn(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64); We force a reference to these external symbols: __ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_prog_runX); __ADDRESSABLE(__bpf_callback_fn); This makes the compiler add the following two symbols with the hashes in the symbol table: 00000000d9421881 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT ABS __kcfi_typeid___bpf_prog_runX 000000009e4709a9 0 NOTYPE WEAK DEFAULT ABS __kcfi_typeid___bpf_callback_fn The JIT can now use the above symbols to emit the hashes in the prologues of the programs and callbacks. For struct_ops trampoline, the bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline() function receives a stub function that would have the hash at (function - 4). The bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline() sets `flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_INDIRECT;` which tells prepare_trampoline() to find the hash before the stub function and emit it in the struct_ops trampoline. Running the selftests causes no CFI warnings: --------------------------------------------- test_progs: Summary: 454/3613 PASSED, 62 SKIPPED, 74 FAILED test_tag: OK (40945 tests) test_verifier: Summary: 789 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED ARM64 Doesn't support DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_CALL_OPS when CFI_CLANG is enabled. This causes all tests that attach fentry to kernel functions to fail. While running the selftests, I saw some CFI warnings which were related to static calls. Josh Poimboeuf had sent a patch series[1] last year that includes a patch to fix this issue. I forward ported those patches and rebased my patch on that series. You can find the tree here[2]. With this tree there are zero CFI warnings. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1679456900.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org/ [2] https://github.com/puranjaymohan/linux/tree/kcfi_bpf Puranjay Mohan (1): arm64/cfi,bpf: Support kCFI + BPF on arm64 arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h | 23 ++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 26 ++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/cfi.h