| Message ID | 20240226165612.GA20787@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel+bounces-82000-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org>
Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a05:7300:a81b:b0:108:e6aa:91d0 with SMTP id
bq27csp2212340dyb;
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:10:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=3;
AJvYcCUtIIsnZm22dPg5xgzforH1wZV32HYOeveQ9tMUQXAI9Y12Z6VsPCdxbGuRBb84ThT+59Ktfc4S5Iqd9EQOOiL/zicl3w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:
AGHT+IHfxzD9/FfNsQumSrGHBq/TWS14LQiJSyPn062S2OFWy4BvqbxsdOYblnx1xDOTn/1fjZsg
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d046:0:b0:566:ef8:a81a with SMTP id
n6-20020aa7d046000000b005660ef8a81amr1659873edo.7.1708967403666;
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:10:03 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1708967403; cv=pass;
d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
b=CL+5HFWYan7gX0Z6A3SK2vjnGqthVaoqAoEb99LJp8P/giqI2URzUyZMPyu/lJrfnp
u74aPYCSwpQZaPRCBjwar6YAEMEI3hnVxU1dMn7WMMPIRCuagChohLRmBHxptVAPbQOZ
ISTWFyRh2E6Eu1z9H6o080p1raMfS7mWfdUwJ7ZttLvy7qKB9p9u98ymCMz09oLb5Wie
Fg/Yy3FhU95ps2lyFpGHavVPRBM0IwnWG7FrKkwrKxluM7cylzQsyTOrIEJXc2IfkJQ3
vudU+w8ODp8SynGEO8Kqr/LW175oaqdjZsTx7j4ZAFre4CrSAeqsfmFXJ8+moPRlwHg2
qBnQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com;
s=arc-20160816;
h=user-agent:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe
:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:message-id:subject:cc:to:from
:date:dkim-signature;
bh=VmU8eK8zqJHms8skNLek8Ax0OMi+knLlvH0aeWRDWZs=;
fh=XYYaR4W4e5P6Am9UNO2Ld8ZOhmhTidS777C2awg0gPA=;
b=HP/R1wCc5lPNdHm4Lcbbvw491foe7UuBNr+G4mBYSck0COYaRXVf9arXoMutz//FIk
eH+H+WND4T/ZvCA9o7cy3jWWmZ4hbiLNU2sCAxGOdmzR+iztmqc/zbPmS6OjE/HUn7ix
CbxXCLS0Vo+KtdhaUhg2Txg7KUfcmCBbxhZ4dQpmSkmcYztoWc7uDu1g+AcblxytZ4M3
4AfIU9DCVz4twW8TmLAW+LdSfcY4YN37gfAGot5dmz92BdkVMeCs8uX0jhoNDaQyOGxz
srIGaRyZ6bDaLBki0PZ3XXnoGhYU3OrcbwKtoWFk0mQs3VfkwWpS/XdJERnL3nMz8mCu
NvHg==;
dara=google.com
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719
header.b=QoXc41Dx;
arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass
dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com);
spf=pass (google.com: domain of
linux-kernel+bounces-82000-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates
147.75.80.249 as permitted sender)
smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-82000-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org";
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com
Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.80.249])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
z7-20020a056402274700b005657f75380esi2343767edd.642.2024.02.26.09.10.03
for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 09:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of
linux-kernel+bounces-82000-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates
147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719
header.b=QoXc41Dx;
arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=redhat.com dkim=pass
dkdomain=redhat.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=redhat.com);
spf=pass (google.com: domain of
linux-kernel+bounces-82000-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates
147.75.80.249 as permitted sender)
smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-82000-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org";
dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com
Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org
[52.25.139.140])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449E21F2A08C
for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:10:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2029131E3B;
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:57:43 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com
header.b="QoXc41Dx"
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
(us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8879B131748
for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:57:39 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
t=1708966661; cv=none;
b=Oze7mIdTd9icTP8ErPBcfGExa1H7L8TSpb6vxKEU55LQrImGlcxMjPJodJLudQSE9JJwPYlQylnfLPQh3NpX4jOMb30xPYu0xetIgQqwhFjR7FaPuGC3Pm0bHqXo38hL522VvKyHeSx6SzsjHVN7mx0082rT9ULVlJnM7U+nUok=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
s=arc-20240116; t=1708966661; c=relaxed/simple;
bh=VmU8eK8zqJHms8skNLek8Ax0OMi+knLlvH0aeWRDWZs=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
Content-Disposition;
b=Cl3lAiK3vOQEk8BREexe/h6z/BOpoFWHIrYqV3YaKh60ldO5z9TdaJvQL8glHppzXL4VFOAMxeRyzv2+s1h9ACR+OrguLJcL23m25rE0tBVH8EOAmAKMWjcIpBlk3Y4DpsdUth1RDa+71+S7jK64njR/ZPj+a53RwNqerux1FJg=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com;
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com
header.b=QoXc41Dx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
s=mimecast20190719; t=1708966658;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type;
bh=VmU8eK8zqJHms8skNLek8Ax0OMi+knLlvH0aeWRDWZs=;
b=QoXc41DxK20JcFOmw33R5cjZFs92YhFxUtfEbbVjzbX6CNIqdhJA3tSOHYJjwbUx/BhsgX
sJbiIOWk1vQ2nhVJwel7IXrbiPY4df3C+ukHF7BbhxKz67K7hCiWGhqm3D5+/8fdB6HuzW
I2xuMksuwNeavT11r4oh8OuH6L9hYLU=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com
[66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
(version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
us-mta-564-XA0tXVSlMfemLL_Xbe4GWA-1; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:57:35 -0500
X-MC-Unique: XA0tXVSlMfemLL_Xbe4GWA-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
[10.11.54.7])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest
SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C68EB185A780;
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.226.85])
by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1406E1C14B04;
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dhcp-27-174.brq.redhat.com (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000
oleg@redhat.com; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:56:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:56:12 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Wen Yang <wenyang.linux@foxmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] get_signal: minor cleanups and fix
Message-ID: <20240226165612.GA20787@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7
X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX
X-GMAIL-THRID: 1791982204394328278
X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1791982204394328278
|
| Series | get_signal: minor cleanups and fix | |
Message
Oleg Nesterov
Feb. 26, 2024, 4:56 p.m. UTC
Wen, as you can see I have changed my mind again ;) Lets remove this clear_siginfo() right now. It is incomplete (and thus looks confusing) and unnecessary. See also 2/3, PF_USER_WORKER's already don't get a fully initialized ksig anyway. Do you see anything wrong? Oleg.