Message ID | 20240118152213.2644269-1-hugo@hugovil.com |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel+bounces-30252-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:7301:2bc4:b0:101:a8e8:374 with SMTP id hx4csp414406dyb; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:23:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHt+MVvoBulUHWT6jCBRYpzZQRqwv1461zP59d1lNMo2Ckn7Zqwn9pkLq3yPNaw5glo6kkj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f80d:b0:1d4:5fdb:59ff with SMTP id ix13-20020a170902f80d00b001d45fdb59ffmr1017519plb.136.1705591388225; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:23:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id be2-20020a170902aa0200b001d6ed0ac199si1591780plb.216.2024.01.18.07.23.07 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 07:23:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-30252-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hugovil.com header.s=x header.b=ibyFs1er; arc=fail (signature failed); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-30252-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-30252-ouuuleilei=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A66EB2276E for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718A228DD3; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b="ibyFs1er" Received: from mail.hugovil.com (mail.hugovil.com [162.243.120.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E59228DA0; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 15:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705591344; cv=none; b=G99R5mM3c5v7N/yXu8kkgsqUokXUKSXqp+sjzfb8M/Ozf4ox0SbU5646zULD7K7g1wt11IMawe/6EkmjKq9/zKbmW1I1bub3/qtPuChoILXapt3izaQAZME3levYod4C578UbrY8WNeZH6sK7601bx7o60tFPsB6ErUf1kgDxj8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705591344; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XrMh+efgRmXscdLLtXKdvP3SscB/ZReuo5yJtjd17UE=; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:From:To:Cc:Date:Message-Id:X-Mailer: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP:X-SA-Exim-Mail-From:X-Spam-Checker-Version: X-Spam-Level:X-Spam-Report:X-Spam-Status:Subject:X-SA-Exim-Version: X-SA-Exim-Scanned; b=FkpwfIupNju3AklNbLhgLd3W32oVp8EgPz5/xS+UQU8BB4Fr7F97vE+jztyPyNtYIFeqHAcdHDzCRDXpyRz9ZNeK6KiLSUkdlyNgR/z4VXWIo8CdJncH2mmBgaui2nThq60JHuejr2LAlZTWChUVzbh31RnP9s6PQuBon3EzFpk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b=ibyFs1er; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hugovil.com ; s=x; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Cc:To :From:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=er1H90D5sP8lfkMr5k8Dh47duGczbyoDoZ6NN0eRzRU=; b=ibyFs1erUbd0OMdmtdHBEhyT+Z jTASvyYqXUZ0KGEs2kNnyNr2TuR9GNFKqs7cK46IJN5Gq9pWodUigfKYwEdNhnh6+G/HMKRmwzzHy +eh2C1tpLnqvtVyoImPbds9lCasalU4cbBLBhshk6QZZq5b5QJK3oWrzMZYe+wgw/luk=; Received: from modemcable168.174-80-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.80.174.168]:57058 helo=pettiford.lan) by mail.hugovil.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <hugo@hugovil.com>) id 1rQUDh-0002lf-31; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:22:17 -0500 From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com> To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, cosmin.tanislav@analog.com, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, shc_work@mail.ru Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, hugo@hugovil.com, Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:21:56 -0500 Message-Id: <20240118152213.2644269-1-hugo@hugovil.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 70.80.174.168 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hugo@hugovil.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. Subject: [PATCH v2 00/17] serial: max310x: cleanups and improvements X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.hugovil.com) X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1788442195648060041 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1788442195648060041 |
Series |
serial: max310x: cleanups and improvements
|
|
Message
Hugo Villeneuve
Jan. 18, 2024, 3:21 p.m. UTC
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
Hello,
this patch series brings a few clean-ups and improvements to the max310x
driver.
Some of these changes are based on suggestions for the sc16is7xx driver by
Andy Shevchenko following this discussion:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHp75VebCZckUrNraYQj9k=Mrn2kbYs1Lx26f5-8rKJ3RXeh-w@mail.gmail.com/
The changes have been tested on a custom board using a max14830 in SPI
mode, with an external oscillator (not crystal). Tests included a simple
communication test with a GPS connected to UART0.
They also have been tested by using i2c-stub to simulate the four ports on a
virtual I2C max14830 device, but with obvious limitations as this cannot
simulate all the hardware functions.
Thank you.
Link: [v1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240117223856.2303475-1-hugo@hugovil.com
Changes for V2:
- Drop patch "serial: max310x: replace ENOTSUPP with preferred EOPNOTSUPP (checkpatch)"
- Fix cover letter typo
- Add Andy Shevchenko Suggested-by and Reviewed-by tags for selected patches
Hugo Villeneuve (17):
serial: max310x: fix NULL pointer dereference in I2C instantiation
serial: max310x: add I2C device table for instantiation from userspace
serial: max310x: use i2c_get_match_data()
serial: max310x: use spi_get_device_match_data()
serial: max310x: fix syntax error in IRQ error message
serial: max310x: remove holes in struct max310x_devtype
serial: max310x: add macro for max number of ports
serial: max310x: use separate regmap name for each port
serial: max310x: simplify probe() and remove() error handling
serial: max310x: add explicit return for some switch default cases
serial: max310x: use dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err()
serial: max310x: replace hardcoded masks with preferred GENMASK()
serial: max310x: use common detect function for all variants
serial: max310x: use common power function for all variants
serial: max310x: replace bare use of 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int'
(checkpatch)
serial: max310x: reformat and improve comments
serial: max310x: fix indentation
drivers/tty/serial/max310x.c | 327 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 164 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-)
base-commit: 0c84bea0cabc4e2b98a3de88eeb4ff798931f056