[V2,0/5] Clean up perf mem

Message ID 20231207192338.400336-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Headers
Series Clean up perf mem |

Message

Liang, Kan Dec. 7, 2023, 7:23 p.m. UTC
  From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Changes since V1:
- Fix strcmp of PMU name checking (Ravi)
- Fix "/," typo (Ian)
- Rename several functions with perf_pmu__mem_events prefix. (Ian)
- Fold the header removal patch into the patch where the cleanups made.
  (Arnaldo)
- Add reviewed-by and tested-by from Ian and Ravi

As discussed in the below thread, the patch set is to clean up perf mem.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/afefab15-cffc-4345-9cf4-c6a4128d4d9c@linux.intel.com/

Introduce generic functions perf_mem_events__ptr(),
perf_mem_events__name() ,and is_mem_loads_aux_event() to replace the
ARCH specific ones.
Simplify the perf_mem_event__supported().

Only keeps the ARCH-specific perf_mem_events array in the corresponding
mem-events.c for each ARCH.

There is no functional change.

The patch set touches almost all the ARCHs, Intel, AMD, ARM, Power and
etc. But I can only test it on two Intel platforms.
Please give it try, if you have machines with other ARCHs.

Here are the test results:
Intel hybrid machine:

$perf mem record -e list
ldlat-loads  : available
ldlat-stores : available

$perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P

$perf mem record -v
calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P

$perf mem record -t store -v
calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P


Intel SPR:
$perf mem record -e list
ldlat-loads  : available
ldlat-stores : available

$perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/}:P

$perf mem record -v
calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}:P -e cpu/mem-stores/P

$perf mem record -t store -v
calling: record -e cpu/mem-stores/P

Kan Liang (5):
  perf mem: Add mem_events into the supported perf_pmu
  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__ptr()
  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name()
  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_event__supported()
  perf mem: Clean up is_mem_loads_aux_event()

 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.c   |  36 +----
 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c          |   6 +
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c |  13 +-
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h |   7 +
 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c        |  11 ++
 tools/perf/arch/s390/util/pmu.c           |   3 +
 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c     |  99 ++----------
 tools/perf/arch/x86/util/pmu.c            |  11 ++
 tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c                  |  28 +++-
 tools/perf/builtin-mem.c                  |  28 +++-
 tools/perf/util/mem-events.c              | 181 +++++++++++++---------
 tools/perf/util/mem-events.h              |  15 +-
 tools/perf/util/pmu.c                     |   4 +-
 tools/perf/util/pmu.h                     |   7 +
 14 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c
  

Comments

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Dec. 7, 2023, 8:31 p.m. UTC | #1
Em Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:23:33AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Changes since V1:
> - Fix strcmp of PMU name checking (Ravi)
> - Fix "/," typo (Ian)
> - Rename several functions with perf_pmu__mem_events prefix. (Ian)
> - Fold the header removal patch into the patch where the cleanups made.
>   (Arnaldo)
> - Add reviewed-by and tested-by from Ian and Ravi

It would be good to have a Tested-by from people working in all the
architectures affectes, like we got from Ravi for AMD, can we get those?

I'm applying it locally for test building, will push to
perf-tools-next/tmp.perf-tools-next for a while, so there is some time
to test.

ARM64 (Leo?) and ppc, for PPC... humm Ravi did it, who could test it now?

- Arnaldo
 
> As discussed in the below thread, the patch set is to clean up perf mem.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/afefab15-cffc-4345-9cf4-c6a4128d4d9c@linux.intel.com/
> 
> Introduce generic functions perf_mem_events__ptr(),
> perf_mem_events__name() ,and is_mem_loads_aux_event() to replace the
> ARCH specific ones.
> Simplify the perf_mem_event__supported().
> 
> Only keeps the ARCH-specific perf_mem_events array in the corresponding
> mem-events.c for each ARCH.
> 
> There is no functional change.
> 
> The patch set touches almost all the ARCHs, Intel, AMD, ARM, Power and
> etc. But I can only test it on two Intel platforms.
> Please give it try, if you have machines with other ARCHs.
> 
> Here are the test results:
> Intel hybrid machine:
> 
> $perf mem record -e list
> ldlat-loads  : available
> ldlat-stores : available
> 
> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P
> 
> $perf mem record -v
> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
> 
> $perf mem record -t store -v
> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
> 
> 
> Intel SPR:
> $perf mem record -e list
> ldlat-loads  : available
> ldlat-stores : available
> 
> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/}:P
> 
> $perf mem record -v
> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}:P -e cpu/mem-stores/P
> 
> $perf mem record -t store -v
> calling: record -e cpu/mem-stores/P
> 
> Kan Liang (5):
>   perf mem: Add mem_events into the supported perf_pmu
>   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__ptr()
>   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name()
>   perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_event__supported()
>   perf mem: Clean up is_mem_loads_aux_event()
> 
>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.c   |  36 +----
>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c          |   6 +
>  tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c |  13 +-
>  tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h |   7 +
>  tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c        |  11 ++
>  tools/perf/arch/s390/util/pmu.c           |   3 +
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c     |  99 ++----------
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/pmu.c            |  11 ++
>  tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c                  |  28 +++-
>  tools/perf/builtin-mem.c                  |  28 +++-
>  tools/perf/util/mem-events.c              | 181 +++++++++++++---------
>  tools/perf/util/mem-events.h              |  15 +-
>  tools/perf/util/pmu.c                     |   4 +-
>  tools/perf/util/pmu.h                     |   7 +
>  14 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c
> 
> -- 
> 2.35.1
>
  
Athira Rajeev Dec. 13, 2023, 9:51 a.m. UTC | #2
> On 08-Dec-2023, at 2:01 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> Em Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:23:33AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>> 
>> Changes since V1:
>> - Fix strcmp of PMU name checking (Ravi)
>> - Fix "/," typo (Ian)
>> - Rename several functions with perf_pmu__mem_events prefix. (Ian)
>> - Fold the header removal patch into the patch where the cleanups made.
>>  (Arnaldo)
>> - Add reviewed-by and tested-by from Ian and Ravi
> 
> It would be good to have a Tested-by from people working in all the
> architectures affectes, like we got from Ravi for AMD, can we get those?
> 
> I'm applying it locally for test building, will push to
> perf-tools-next/tmp.perf-tools-next for a while, so there is some time
> to test.
> 
> ARM64 (Leo?) and ppc, for PPC... humm Ravi did it, who could test it now?
Hi Arnaldo, Ravi

Looking into this for testing on powerpc. Will update back.

Thanks
Athira
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
>> As discussed in the below thread, the patch set is to clean up perf mem.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/afefab15-cffc-4345-9cf4-c6a4128d4d9c@linux.intel.com/
>> 
>> Introduce generic functions perf_mem_events__ptr(),
>> perf_mem_events__name() ,and is_mem_loads_aux_event() to replace the
>> ARCH specific ones.
>> Simplify the perf_mem_event__supported().
>> 
>> Only keeps the ARCH-specific perf_mem_events array in the corresponding
>> mem-events.c for each ARCH.
>> 
>> There is no functional change.
>> 
>> The patch set touches almost all the ARCHs, Intel, AMD, ARM, Power and
>> etc. But I can only test it on two Intel platforms.
>> Please give it try, if you have machines with other ARCHs.
>> 
>> Here are the test results:
>> Intel hybrid machine:
>> 
>> $perf mem record -e list
>> ldlat-loads  : available
>> ldlat-stores : available
>> 
>> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P
>> 
>> $perf mem record -v
>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>> 
>> $perf mem record -t store -v
>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>> 
>> 
>> Intel SPR:
>> $perf mem record -e list
>> ldlat-loads  : available
>> ldlat-stores : available
>> 
>> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
>> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/}:P
>> 
>> $perf mem record -v
>> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}:P -e cpu/mem-stores/P
>> 
>> $perf mem record -t store -v
>> calling: record -e cpu/mem-stores/P
>> 
>> Kan Liang (5):
>>  perf mem: Add mem_events into the supported perf_pmu
>>  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__ptr()
>>  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name()
>>  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_event__supported()
>>  perf mem: Clean up is_mem_loads_aux_event()
>> 
>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.c   |  36 +----
>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c          |   6 +
>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c |  13 +-
>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h |   7 +
>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c        |  11 ++
>> tools/perf/arch/s390/util/pmu.c           |   3 +
>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c     |  99 ++----------
>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/pmu.c            |  11 ++
>> tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c                  |  28 +++-
>> tools/perf/builtin-mem.c                  |  28 +++-
>> tools/perf/util/mem-events.c              | 181 +++++++++++++---------
>> tools/perf/util/mem-events.h              |  15 +-
>> tools/perf/util/pmu.c                     |   4 +-
>> tools/perf/util/pmu.h                     |   7 +
>> 14 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h
>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c
>> 
>> -- 
>> 2.35.1
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> - Arnaldo
  
Liang, Kan Dec. 13, 2023, 7:54 p.m. UTC | #3
On 2023-12-13 4:51 a.m., Athira Rajeev wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 08-Dec-2023, at 2:01 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Em Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:23:33AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com escreveu:
>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Changes since V1:
>>> - Fix strcmp of PMU name checking (Ravi)
>>> - Fix "/," typo (Ian)
>>> - Rename several functions with perf_pmu__mem_events prefix. (Ian)
>>> - Fold the header removal patch into the patch where the cleanups made.
>>>  (Arnaldo)
>>> - Add reviewed-by and tested-by from Ian and Ravi
>>
>> It would be good to have a Tested-by from people working in all the
>> architectures affectes, like we got from Ravi for AMD, can we get those?
>>
>> I'm applying it locally for test building, will push to
>> perf-tools-next/tmp.perf-tools-next for a while, so there is some time
>> to test.
>>
>> ARM64 (Leo?) and ppc, for PPC... humm Ravi did it, who could test it now?
> Hi Arnaldo, Ravi
> 
> Looking into this for testing on powerpc. Will update back.
>

Thanks Athira. I've sent out the latest V3. Please give it a try.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231213195154.1085945-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com/

Thanks,
Kan

> Thanks
> Athira
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>>
>>> As discussed in the below thread, the patch set is to clean up perf mem.
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/afefab15-cffc-4345-9cf4-c6a4128d4d9c@linux.intel.com/
>>>
>>> Introduce generic functions perf_mem_events__ptr(),
>>> perf_mem_events__name() ,and is_mem_loads_aux_event() to replace the
>>> ARCH specific ones.
>>> Simplify the perf_mem_event__supported().
>>>
>>> Only keeps the ARCH-specific perf_mem_events array in the corresponding
>>> mem-events.c for each ARCH.
>>>
>>> There is no functional change.
>>>
>>> The patch set touches almost all the ARCHs, Intel, AMD, ARM, Power and
>>> etc. But I can only test it on two Intel platforms.
>>> Please give it try, if you have machines with other ARCHs.
>>>
>>> Here are the test results:
>>> Intel hybrid machine:
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -e list
>>> ldlat-loads  : available
>>> ldlat-stores : available
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=50/P
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -v
>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -t store -v
>>> calling: record -e cpu_atom/mem-stores/P -e cpu_core/mem-stores/P
>>>
>>>
>>> Intel SPR:
>>> $perf mem record -e list
>>> ldlat-loads  : available
>>> ldlat-stores : available
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -e ldlat-loads -v --ldlat 50
>>> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=50/}:P
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -v
>>> calling: record -e {cpu/mem-loads-aux/,cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/}:P -e cpu/mem-stores/P
>>>
>>> $perf mem record -t store -v
>>> calling: record -e cpu/mem-stores/P
>>>
>>> Kan Liang (5):
>>>  perf mem: Add mem_events into the supported perf_pmu
>>>  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__ptr()
>>>  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_events__name()
>>>  perf mem: Clean up perf_mem_event__supported()
>>>  perf mem: Clean up is_mem_loads_aux_event()
>>>
>>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/mem-events.c   |  36 +----
>>> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/pmu.c          |   6 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.c |  13 +-
>>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h |   7 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c        |  11 ++
>>> tools/perf/arch/s390/util/pmu.c           |   3 +
>>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/mem-events.c     |  99 ++----------
>>> tools/perf/arch/x86/util/pmu.c            |  11 ++
>>> tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c                  |  28 +++-
>>> tools/perf/builtin-mem.c                  |  28 +++-
>>> tools/perf/util/mem-events.c              | 181 +++++++++++++---------
>>> tools/perf/util/mem-events.h              |  15 +-
>>> tools/perf/util/pmu.c                     |   4 +-
>>> tools/perf/util/pmu.h                     |   7 +
>>> 14 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/mem-events.h
>>> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/pmu.c
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> 2.35.1
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> - Arnaldo
> 
> 
>