Message ID | 20231120093847.2228127-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a59:9910:0:b0:403:3b70:6f57 with SMTP id i16csp1927894vqn; Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:45:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH5A3Evek9t41T0l9/1Ul2lXS0l6Jgg/JPLYSXMXppROJeO4EwE9aZq6D4Wt17fQQfjfWVC X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e802:b0:1ce:5c8e:bd7e with SMTP id u2-20020a170902e80200b001ce5c8ebd7emr5419669plg.26.1700444743758; Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:45:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1700444743; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=csCspmsy4r7I8PnaE+B5SkFX1KIF9UO4YcOTyJ7T5aipBrh0lpTO2bpEqZlFAgXs7g qwl4yeU4bO0rTmK1SFW6C1m7+KTVYUJtcdYsEcKZOfVFcPxDJIfNpMRNFl2vKCOcIKBU m8bs6H1h95WE7AdBeXwp2xH432GS6dbMvrykG0mh1dlEFpGs/1YwYAuUKWfQIpWyCKUE LT6Xy4I1pwYkn7MfXpxX6l/k9jchh2SvuoBJwZPACQ8P4rmSFg75NQj6DLgrWT5P61mN xZHbdpYu0jIAsujYVTKmuH8xfbJap70JM2iD6tOGlV/WkEYE2t66qjMapGjg1tEJyv0k EoJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=dx06yHX5+WkCl4tXt9Qp2gD6S5HCymzgwJYGyocHds0=; fh=Oq8AZtSdB9WVO0QeE9Ym+sXB+FvqBHwYg1xHLfVNApg=; b=taOyPSgwEY48DOoiFb/5dmiKeqSnQneKh8MoC8Sl52jr3ODrZpt9WqbnjnX+iR1H2c xtUlAaLDnQ6pXwuzF/BOQI8K58IKT6ua2db96n1DcSno8eGqfM/4hCOJL/boEyV43e3Z LvpK58X/KccT+j5FWO5MyI2Zx6jTYc9dOANbvaamljS01iebBSa52BIpXgzYXc8CHny3 UkU5cHkJWxASgRo4XUIVDFgQ63WNCB9PpzP/tCPO44TZ4g8KmjW2uzrEh3Y3D1e9e9au 9q4SYp/SW465TGWizrBOOKGJRbH7EuATAknCVyeMQfkmkyl4aO2MwVQ12rm1K/3IAMyR e4jQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from groat.vger.email (groat.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b2-20020a170902ed0200b001cc692bf120si6882292pld.61.2023.11.19.17.45.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:45:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by groat.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E47D807F2B2; Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:45:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.11 at groat.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231753AbjKTBoy (ORCPT <rfc822;lhua1029@gmail.com> + 28 others); Sun, 19 Nov 2023 20:44:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45282 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231518AbjKTBox (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 19 Nov 2023 20:44:53 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFDABAF; Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:44:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4SYVgF3jFyz4f3l1J; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:44:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB0A1A0169; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:44:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.104.67]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgA3iA4LulplbmCcBQ--.47132S4; Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:44:45 +0800 (CST) From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> To: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH 0/2] block: warn once for each partition in bio_check_ro() Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 17:38:45 +0800 Message-Id: <20231120093847.2228127-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgA3iA4LulplbmCcBQ--.47132S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUYc7AC8VAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E 6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l87I20VAvwVAaII0Ic2I_JF v_Gryl8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AK xVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67 AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28I cVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx 0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwAC jI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr 0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY 17CE14v26r126r1DMIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcV C0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJr0_WFyUJwCI 42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWI evJa73UjIFyTuYvjTRNgAwUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 51xn3trlr6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on groat.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (groat.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:45:13 -0800 (PST) X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1783045547883119769 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1783045547883119769 |
Series |
block: warn once for each partition in bio_check_ro()
|
|
Message
Yu Kuai
Nov. 20, 2023, 9:38 a.m. UTC
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Yu Kuai (2):
block: introduce new field flags in block_device
block: warn once for each partition in bio_check_ro()
block/bdev.c | 15 ++++++++-------
block/blk-core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
block/genhd.c | 8 +++++---
block/ioctl.c | 2 +-
include/linux/blk_types.h | 13 +++++++------
include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++--
6 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
Comments
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 05:38:46PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > There are multiple switches in struct block_device, use seperate bool > fields for them is not gracefully. Add a new field flags and replace > swithes to a bit, there are no functional changes, and preapre to add > a new switch in the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > --- > block/bdev.c | 15 ++++++++------- > block/blk-core.c | 7 ++++--- > block/genhd.c | 8 +++++--- > block/ioctl.c | 2 +- > include/linux/blk_types.h | 12 ++++++------ > include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++-- > 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c > index fc8d28d77495..cb849bcf61ae 100644 > --- a/block/bdev.c > +++ b/block/bdev.c > @@ -408,10 +408,10 @@ struct block_device *bdev_alloc(struct gendisk *disk, u8 partno) > bdev->bd_partno = partno; > bdev->bd_inode = inode; > bdev->bd_queue = disk->queue; > - if (partno) > - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio; > + if (partno && test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags)) > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); > else > - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = false; > + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); > bdev->bd_stats = alloc_percpu(struct disk_stats); > if (!bdev->bd_stats) { > iput(inode); > @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder) > bdev->bd_holder = NULL; > bdev->bd_holder_ops = NULL; > mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_holder_lock); > - if (bdev->bd_write_holder) > + if (test_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags)) > unblock = true; > } > if (!whole->bd_holders) > @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder) > */ > if (unblock) { > disk_unblock_events(bdev->bd_disk); > - bdev->bd_write_holder = false; > + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags); > } > } > > @@ -878,9 +878,10 @@ struct bdev_handle *bdev_open_by_dev(dev_t dev, blk_mode_t mode, void *holder, > * writeable reference is too fragile given the way @mode is > * used in blkdev_get/put(). > */ > - if ((mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE) && !bdev->bd_write_holder && > + if ((mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE) && > + !test_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags) && > (disk->event_flags & DISK_EVENT_FLAG_BLOCK_ON_EXCL_WRITE)) { > - bdev->bd_write_holder = true; > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags); > unblock_events = false; > } > } > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > index fdf25b8d6e78..577a693165d8 100644 > --- a/block/blk-core.c > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > @@ -482,7 +482,8 @@ __setup("fail_make_request=", setup_fail_make_request); > > bool should_fail_request(struct block_device *part, unsigned int bytes) > { > - return part->bd_make_it_fail && should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes); > + return test_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &part->flags) && > + should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes); > } > > static int __init fail_make_request_debugfs(void) > @@ -595,7 +596,7 @@ static void __submit_bio(struct bio *bio) > if (unlikely(!blk_crypto_bio_prep(&bio))) > return; > > - if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_has_submit_bio) { > + if (!test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bio->bi_bdev->flags)) { > blk_mq_submit_bio(bio); > } else if (likely(bio_queue_enter(bio) == 0)) { > struct gendisk *disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk; > @@ -703,7 +704,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio) > */ > if (current->bio_list) > bio_list_add(¤t->bio_list[0], bio); > - else if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_has_submit_bio) > + else if (!test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bio->bi_bdev->flags)) > __submit_bio_noacct_mq(bio); > else > __submit_bio_noacct(bio); > diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c > index c9d06f72c587..026f4c6d5b7e 100644 > --- a/block/genhd.c > +++ b/block/genhd.c > @@ -413,7 +413,8 @@ int __must_check device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk, > elevator_init_mq(disk->queue); > > /* Mark bdev as having a submit_bio, if needed */ > - disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->fops->submit_bio != NULL; > + if (disk->fops->submit_bio) > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags); > > /* > * If the driver provides an explicit major number it also must provide > @@ -1062,7 +1063,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(diskseq, 0444, diskseq_show, NULL); > ssize_t part_fail_show(struct device *dev, > struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > { > - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_make_it_fail); > + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", > + test_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &dev_to_bdev(dev)->flags)); > } > > ssize_t part_fail_store(struct device *dev, > @@ -1072,7 +1074,7 @@ ssize_t part_fail_store(struct device *dev, > int i; > > if (count > 0 && sscanf(buf, "%d", &i) > 0) > - dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_make_it_fail = i; > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &dev_to_bdev(dev)->flags); > > return count; > } > diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c > index 4160f4e6bd5b..a548c718a5fb 100644 > --- a/block/ioctl.c > +++ b/block/ioctl.c > @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static int blkdev_roset(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned cmd, > if (ret) > return ret; > } > - bdev->bd_read_only = n; > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY, &bdev->flags); > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h > index 52e264d5a830..95bd26c62655 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h > @@ -37,17 +37,20 @@ struct bio_crypt_ctx; > #define PAGE_SECTORS (1 << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT) > #define SECTOR_MASK (PAGE_SECTORS - 1) > > +#define BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY 0 /* read-only-policy */ > +#define BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER 1 > +#define BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO 2 > +#define BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL 3 > + > struct block_device { > sector_t bd_start_sect; > sector_t bd_nr_sectors; > struct gendisk * bd_disk; > struct request_queue * bd_queue; > struct disk_stats __percpu *bd_stats; > + unsigned long flags; > unsigned long bd_stamp; > - bool bd_read_only; /* read-only policy */ > u8 bd_partno; > - bool bd_write_holder; > - bool bd_has_submit_bio; The idea looks good, but not necessary to add new 8 bytes, and you may put all these flags and `bd_partno` into single 'unsigned long', and add helpers to retrieve part no, since there are not many ->bd_partno references. Thanks, Ming
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 02:37:59PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2023/11/20 11:00, Ming Lei 写道: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 05:38:46PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > > > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > > > > > There are multiple switches in struct block_device, use seperate bool > > > fields for them is not gracefully. Add a new field flags and replace > > > swithes to a bit, there are no functional changes, and preapre to add > > > a new switch in the next patch. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > > --- > > > block/bdev.c | 15 ++++++++------- > > > block/blk-core.c | 7 ++++--- > > > block/genhd.c | 8 +++++--- > > > block/ioctl.c | 2 +- > > > include/linux/blk_types.h | 12 ++++++------ > > > include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++-- > > > 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c > > > index fc8d28d77495..cb849bcf61ae 100644 > > > --- a/block/bdev.c > > > +++ b/block/bdev.c > > > @@ -408,10 +408,10 @@ struct block_device *bdev_alloc(struct gendisk *disk, u8 partno) > > > bdev->bd_partno = partno; > > > bdev->bd_inode = inode; > > > bdev->bd_queue = disk->queue; > > > - if (partno) > > > - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio; > > > + if (partno && test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags)) > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); > > > else > > > - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = false; > > > + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); > > > bdev->bd_stats = alloc_percpu(struct disk_stats); > > > if (!bdev->bd_stats) { > > > iput(inode); > > > @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder) > > > bdev->bd_holder = NULL; > > > bdev->bd_holder_ops = NULL; > > > mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_holder_lock); > > > - if (bdev->bd_write_holder) > > > + if (test_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags)) > > > unblock = true; > > > } > > > if (!whole->bd_holders) > > > @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder) > > > */ > > > if (unblock) { > > > disk_unblock_events(bdev->bd_disk); > > > - bdev->bd_write_holder = false; > > > + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags); > > > } > > > } > > > @@ -878,9 +878,10 @@ struct bdev_handle *bdev_open_by_dev(dev_t dev, blk_mode_t mode, void *holder, > > > * writeable reference is too fragile given the way @mode is > > > * used in blkdev_get/put(). > > > */ > > > - if ((mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE) && !bdev->bd_write_holder && > > > + if ((mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE) && > > > + !test_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags) && > > > (disk->event_flags & DISK_EVENT_FLAG_BLOCK_ON_EXCL_WRITE)) { > > > - bdev->bd_write_holder = true; > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags); > > > unblock_events = false; > > > } > > > } > > > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > > > index fdf25b8d6e78..577a693165d8 100644 > > > --- a/block/blk-core.c > > > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > > > @@ -482,7 +482,8 @@ __setup("fail_make_request=", setup_fail_make_request); > > > bool should_fail_request(struct block_device *part, unsigned int bytes) > > > { > > > - return part->bd_make_it_fail && should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes); > > > + return test_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &part->flags) && > > > + should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes); > > > } > > > static int __init fail_make_request_debugfs(void) > > > @@ -595,7 +596,7 @@ static void __submit_bio(struct bio *bio) > > > if (unlikely(!blk_crypto_bio_prep(&bio))) > > > return; > > > - if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_has_submit_bio) { > > > + if (!test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bio->bi_bdev->flags)) { > > > blk_mq_submit_bio(bio); > > > } else if (likely(bio_queue_enter(bio) == 0)) { > > > struct gendisk *disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk; > > > @@ -703,7 +704,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio) > > > */ > > > if (current->bio_list) > > > bio_list_add(¤t->bio_list[0], bio); > > > - else if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_has_submit_bio) > > > + else if (!test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bio->bi_bdev->flags)) > > > __submit_bio_noacct_mq(bio); > > > else > > > __submit_bio_noacct(bio); > > > diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c > > > index c9d06f72c587..026f4c6d5b7e 100644 > > > --- a/block/genhd.c > > > +++ b/block/genhd.c > > > @@ -413,7 +413,8 @@ int __must_check device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk, > > > elevator_init_mq(disk->queue); > > > /* Mark bdev as having a submit_bio, if needed */ > > > - disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->fops->submit_bio != NULL; > > > + if (disk->fops->submit_bio) > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags); > > > /* > > > * If the driver provides an explicit major number it also must provide > > > @@ -1062,7 +1063,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(diskseq, 0444, diskseq_show, NULL); > > > ssize_t part_fail_show(struct device *dev, > > > struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > > > { > > > - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_make_it_fail); > > > + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", > > > + test_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &dev_to_bdev(dev)->flags)); > > > } > > > ssize_t part_fail_store(struct device *dev, > > > @@ -1072,7 +1074,7 @@ ssize_t part_fail_store(struct device *dev, > > > int i; > > > if (count > 0 && sscanf(buf, "%d", &i) > 0) > > > - dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_make_it_fail = i; > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &dev_to_bdev(dev)->flags); > > > return count; > > > } > > > diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c > > > index 4160f4e6bd5b..a548c718a5fb 100644 > > > --- a/block/ioctl.c > > > +++ b/block/ioctl.c > > > @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static int blkdev_roset(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned cmd, > > > if (ret) > > > return ret; > > > } > > > - bdev->bd_read_only = n; > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY, &bdev->flags); > > > return 0; > > > } > > > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h > > > index 52e264d5a830..95bd26c62655 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h > > > @@ -37,17 +37,20 @@ struct bio_crypt_ctx; > > > #define PAGE_SECTORS (1 << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT) > > > #define SECTOR_MASK (PAGE_SECTORS - 1) > > > +#define BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY 0 /* read-only-policy */ > > > +#define BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER 1 > > > +#define BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO 2 > > > +#define BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL 3 > > > + > > > struct block_device { > > > sector_t bd_start_sect; > > > sector_t bd_nr_sectors; > > > struct gendisk * bd_disk; > > > struct request_queue * bd_queue; > > > struct disk_stats __percpu *bd_stats; > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > unsigned long bd_stamp; > > > - bool bd_read_only; /* read-only policy */ > > > u8 bd_partno; > > > - bool bd_write_holder; > > > - bool bd_has_submit_bio; > > > > The idea looks good, but not necessary to add new 8 bytes, and you may > > put all these flags and `bd_partno` into single 'unsigned long', and add > > helpers to retrieve part no, since there are not many ->bd_partno > > references. > > Yes, it make sense. > > By the way, take a look at component of block_device, I think they can > be reorganized to save some space, in this case, new 8 bytes won't make > this struct bigger, in fact, total size will be shrinked by 8 types > after following changes: > > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h > index 95bd26c62655..c94242a9ad92 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h > @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ struct block_device { > struct disk_stats __percpu *bd_stats; > unsigned long flags; > unsigned long bd_stamp; > - u8 bd_partno; > dev_t bd_dev; > atomic_t bd_openers; > spinlock_t bd_size_lock; /* for bd_inode->i_size > updates */ > @@ -60,13 +59,14 @@ struct block_device { > const struct blk_holder_ops *bd_holder_ops; > struct mutex bd_holder_lock; > int bd_holders; > + u8 bd_partno; 'bd_partno' needs to be kept in the 1st cacheline, so not good to move it. Thanks, Ming
On 11/20/23 10:38, Yu Kuai wrote: > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > There are multiple switches in struct block_device, use seperate bool > fields for them is not gracefully. Add a new field flags and replace > swithes to a bit, there are no functional changes, and preapre to add > a new switch in the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > --- > block/bdev.c | 15 ++++++++------- > block/blk-core.c | 7 ++++--- > block/genhd.c | 8 +++++--- > block/ioctl.c | 2 +- > include/linux/blk_types.h | 12 ++++++------ > include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++-- > 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c > index fc8d28d77495..cb849bcf61ae 100644 > --- a/block/bdev.c > +++ b/block/bdev.c > @@ -408,10 +408,10 @@ struct block_device *bdev_alloc(struct gendisk *disk, u8 partno) > bdev->bd_partno = partno; > bdev->bd_inode = inode; > bdev->bd_queue = disk->queue; > - if (partno) > - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio; > + if (partno && test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags)) > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); > else > - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = false; > + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); > bdev->bd_stats = alloc_percpu(struct disk_stats); > if (!bdev->bd_stats) { > iput(inode); Couldn't you achieve the very same result by using 'READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()' and keep the structure as-is? Cheers, Hannes-- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg Managing Directors: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 04:01:03PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2023/11/20 11:00, Ming Lei 写道: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 05:38:46PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > > > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > > > > > There are multiple switches in struct block_device, use seperate bool > > > fields for them is not gracefully. Add a new field flags and replace > > > swithes to a bit, there are no functional changes, and preapre to add > > > a new switch in the next patch. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> > > > --- > > > block/bdev.c | 15 ++++++++------- > > > block/blk-core.c | 7 ++++--- > > > block/genhd.c | 8 +++++--- > > > block/ioctl.c | 2 +- > > > include/linux/blk_types.h | 12 ++++++------ > > > include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++-- > > > 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c > > > index fc8d28d77495..cb849bcf61ae 100644 > > > --- a/block/bdev.c > > > +++ b/block/bdev.c > > > @@ -408,10 +408,10 @@ struct block_device *bdev_alloc(struct gendisk *disk, u8 partno) > > > bdev->bd_partno = partno; > > > bdev->bd_inode = inode; > > > bdev->bd_queue = disk->queue; > > > - if (partno) > > > - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio; > > > + if (partno && test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags)) > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); > > > else > > > - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = false; > > > + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); > > > bdev->bd_stats = alloc_percpu(struct disk_stats); > > > if (!bdev->bd_stats) { > > > iput(inode); > > > @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder) > > > bdev->bd_holder = NULL; > > > bdev->bd_holder_ops = NULL; > > > mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_holder_lock); > > > - if (bdev->bd_write_holder) > > > + if (test_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags)) > > > unblock = true; > > > } > > > if (!whole->bd_holders) > > > @@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static void bd_end_claim(struct block_device *bdev, void *holder) > > > */ > > > if (unblock) { > > > disk_unblock_events(bdev->bd_disk); > > > - bdev->bd_write_holder = false; > > > + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags); > > > } > > > } > > > @@ -878,9 +878,10 @@ struct bdev_handle *bdev_open_by_dev(dev_t dev, blk_mode_t mode, void *holder, > > > * writeable reference is too fragile given the way @mode is > > > * used in blkdev_get/put(). > > > */ > > > - if ((mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE) && !bdev->bd_write_holder && > > > + if ((mode & BLK_OPEN_WRITE) && > > > + !test_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags) && > > > (disk->event_flags & DISK_EVENT_FLAG_BLOCK_ON_EXCL_WRITE)) { > > > - bdev->bd_write_holder = true; > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER, &bdev->flags); > > > unblock_events = false; > > > } > > > } > > > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > > > index fdf25b8d6e78..577a693165d8 100644 > > > --- a/block/blk-core.c > > > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > > > @@ -482,7 +482,8 @@ __setup("fail_make_request=", setup_fail_make_request); > > > bool should_fail_request(struct block_device *part, unsigned int bytes) > > > { > > > - return part->bd_make_it_fail && should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes); > > > + return test_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &part->flags) && > > > + should_fail(&fail_make_request, bytes); > > > } > > > static int __init fail_make_request_debugfs(void) > > > @@ -595,7 +596,7 @@ static void __submit_bio(struct bio *bio) > > > if (unlikely(!blk_crypto_bio_prep(&bio))) > > > return; > > > - if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_has_submit_bio) { > > > + if (!test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bio->bi_bdev->flags)) { > > > blk_mq_submit_bio(bio); > > > } else if (likely(bio_queue_enter(bio) == 0)) { > > > struct gendisk *disk = bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk; > > > @@ -703,7 +704,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio) > > > */ > > > if (current->bio_list) > > > bio_list_add(¤t->bio_list[0], bio); > > > - else if (!bio->bi_bdev->bd_has_submit_bio) > > > + else if (!test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bio->bi_bdev->flags)) > > > __submit_bio_noacct_mq(bio); > > > else > > > __submit_bio_noacct(bio); > > > diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c > > > index c9d06f72c587..026f4c6d5b7e 100644 > > > --- a/block/genhd.c > > > +++ b/block/genhd.c > > > @@ -413,7 +413,8 @@ int __must_check device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk, > > > elevator_init_mq(disk->queue); > > > /* Mark bdev as having a submit_bio, if needed */ > > > - disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->fops->submit_bio != NULL; > > > + if (disk->fops->submit_bio) > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags); > > > /* > > > * If the driver provides an explicit major number it also must provide > > > @@ -1062,7 +1063,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(diskseq, 0444, diskseq_show, NULL); > > > ssize_t part_fail_show(struct device *dev, > > > struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > > > { > > > - return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_make_it_fail); > > > + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", > > > + test_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &dev_to_bdev(dev)->flags)); > > > } > > > ssize_t part_fail_store(struct device *dev, > > > @@ -1072,7 +1074,7 @@ ssize_t part_fail_store(struct device *dev, > > > int i; > > > if (count > 0 && sscanf(buf, "%d", &i) > 0) > > > - dev_to_bdev(dev)->bd_make_it_fail = i; > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL, &dev_to_bdev(dev)->flags); > > > return count; > > > } > > > diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c > > > index 4160f4e6bd5b..a548c718a5fb 100644 > > > --- a/block/ioctl.c > > > +++ b/block/ioctl.c > > > @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ static int blkdev_roset(struct block_device *bdev, unsigned cmd, > > > if (ret) > > > return ret; > > > } > > > - bdev->bd_read_only = n; > > > + set_bit(BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY, &bdev->flags); > > > return 0; > > > } > > > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h > > > index 52e264d5a830..95bd26c62655 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h > > > @@ -37,17 +37,20 @@ struct bio_crypt_ctx; > > > #define PAGE_SECTORS (1 << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT) > > > #define SECTOR_MASK (PAGE_SECTORS - 1) > > > +#define BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY 0 /* read-only-policy */ > > > +#define BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER 1 > > > +#define BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO 2 > > > +#define BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL 3 > > > + > > > struct block_device { > > > sector_t bd_start_sect; > > > sector_t bd_nr_sectors; > > > struct gendisk * bd_disk; > > > struct request_queue * bd_queue; > > > struct disk_stats __percpu *bd_stats; > > > + unsigned long flags; > > > unsigned long bd_stamp; > > > - bool bd_read_only; /* read-only policy */ > > > u8 bd_partno; > > > - bool bd_write_holder; > > > - bool bd_has_submit_bio; > > > > The idea looks good, but not necessary to add new 8 bytes, and you may > > put all these flags and `bd_partno` into single 'unsigned long', and add > > helpers to retrieve part no, since there are not many ->bd_partno > > references. > > Hi, I'm not quite sure which is the best way to implement this, anyway, > I come up with following implementation, can you please take a look > before I send a new version? > > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h > index 52e264d5a830..4e29774b14fd 100644 > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h > @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ struct bio_crypt_ctx; > #define PAGE_SECTORS (1 << PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT) > #define SECTOR_MASK (PAGE_SECTORS - 1) > > +#define BD_FLAG_READ_ONLY 0 /* read-only-policy */ > +#define BD_FLAG_WRITE_HOLDER 1 > +#define BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO 2 > +#define BD_FLAG_MAKE_IT_FAIL 3 > +#define BD_FLAGS_MAX 16 > + > struct block_device { > sector_t bd_start_sect; > sector_t bd_nr_sectors; > @@ -44,10 +50,20 @@ struct block_device { > struct request_queue * bd_queue; > struct disk_stats __percpu *bd_stats; > unsigned long bd_stamp; > - bool bd_read_only; /* read-only policy */ > - u8 bd_partno; > - bool bd_write_holder; > - bool bd_has_submit_bio; > + > + /* > + * In order to keep both flags and bd_partno in the first cacheline, > + * first 16 bits are used for flags. > + */ > + union { > + unsigned long flags; > + struct { > +#ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN > + u16 __flags; > +#endif > + u8 bd_partno; > + }; > + }; You can follow the similar pattern of bio->bi_opf. Thanks, Ming
Hi, 在 2023/11/20 18:45, Hannes Reinecke 写道: > On 11/20/23 10:38, Yu Kuai wrote: >> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> >> >> There are multiple switches in struct block_device, use seperate bool >> fields for them is not gracefully. Add a new field flags and replace >> swithes to a bit, there are no functional changes, and preapre to add >> a new switch in the next patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> >> --- >> block/bdev.c | 15 ++++++++------- >> block/blk-core.c | 7 ++++--- >> block/genhd.c | 8 +++++--- >> block/ioctl.c | 2 +- >> include/linux/blk_types.h | 12 ++++++------ >> include/linux/blkdev.h | 5 +++-- >> 6 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c >> index fc8d28d77495..cb849bcf61ae 100644 >> --- a/block/bdev.c >> +++ b/block/bdev.c >> @@ -408,10 +408,10 @@ struct block_device *bdev_alloc(struct gendisk >> *disk, u8 partno) >> bdev->bd_partno = partno; >> bdev->bd_inode = inode; >> bdev->bd_queue = disk->queue; >> - if (partno) >> - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = disk->part0->bd_has_submit_bio; >> + if (partno && test_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &disk->part0->flags)) >> + set_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); >> else >> - bdev->bd_has_submit_bio = false; >> + clear_bit(BD_FLAG_HAS_SUBMIT_BIO, &bdev->flags); >> bdev->bd_stats = alloc_percpu(struct disk_stats); >> if (!bdev->bd_stats) { >> iput(inode); > > Couldn't you achieve the very same result by using > 'READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()' and keep the structure as-is? Yes, remove this patch and add a new bool field in the next patch can work as well, the idea here is replace multiple fields with a single flag, and just use the flag in next patch. If people thinks add a new bool field is better, I'll follow that. Thanks, Kuai > > Cheers, > > Hannes-- > Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect > hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg > Managing Directors: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich > (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) > > . >