From patchwork Thu Oct 12 02:48:37 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Rongwei Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 15252 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a05:612c:2908:b0:403:3b70:6f57 with SMTP id ib8csp945570vqb; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:49:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGftBXMtHSxr1KSo919aCeFk8FqJq+UCzgTPh8bSya25SCJgRbs2aU+nUpRo/O6Bmn8SNNn X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2286:b0:3ae:100d:5320 with SMTP id bo6-20020a056808228600b003ae100d5320mr22944186oib.2.1697078988844; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:49:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1697078988; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aXa4th3eD8BS08c2dbQHWVrv6NWoRGEq4WGyVqlpeAEqbY3vmu0d2LgE4C57VzIzON 1n3NVXcHk3oXxEqrHtfyjZbOO1t2JdzjTpYTb2UeMBIk6Yrl6+NvCK/OEHd/KLCHeN3l SgSD9QczL+kot8wbPHgCyI4VQ9DOVvhbtbkiilh6trKOUMKVhsxfZJb4/DH5c8bblwY3 kyDGUA+wCafpBWDtQIMih/DiLARTSOoxc+HmqbxZijKcZ5vcEoHyVHbGtzqmWwfy7qv7 dOiq2JgmcZySmDeHVhCiShdWHOBHwhSxSvhyJ1fLjv9+UuU0jRv/ugCekcqY+4f3vXE+ jo5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=DkkZZ//wYkiJURWukxbOdUoZN7k+qEzrl/oNW2L9xWA=; fh=ZYoHe1wlSxRVpYSXw5DcseDzNzuurc0wqkDMPTWnoPk=; b=SjXtq+RBCoXpT3bM06oRkST+tviUUdjYKsp8/eujUj9dmKjHv7CfEXizRjrbzyZmWf lzP4kt+0TAkF0XboYuY/bCgBzt+M0W/hNYqOBYgqNQZDzXG11BU0f6oPXgcbQ3jP5248 ZLuGxRJTy6Kdwmvu0+U5sp7eJcNXeHGaWU0ZoDkV4SyvUsHZGuiPvS1lyvXhtUaCJNdx Iw3dmNI2GE1FwLfDfYf2JrAbi0i049FWWFXxnkQbU+yr/PqLQGROxEo40MB05EeIVh5R ZNgtAB7aJyxczgmyEuXISFiijgYGG7LEyVH++2nS+opf5dEg1qCormOfgr5keYaPlXTW fgvA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: from fry.vger.email (fry.vger.email. [23.128.96.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l190-20020a6388c7000000b0059c02a0f7e3si1091317pgd.343.2023.10.11.19.49.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by fry.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9315E80A28DF; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:49:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at fry.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1376786AbjJLCtR (ORCPT + 18 others); Wed, 11 Oct 2023 22:49:17 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56904 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235273AbjJLCsw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2023 22:48:52 -0400 Received: from out30-118.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-118.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.118]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA12C6 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:48:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R191e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045176;MF=rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=9;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VtykMeL_1697078924; Received: from localhost.localdomain(mailfrom:rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VtykMeL_1697078924) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:48:47 +0800 From: Rongwei Wang To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, tj@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/5] support NUMA emulation for arm64 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:48:37 +0800 Message-Id: <20231012024842.99703-1-rongwei.wang@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on fry.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (fry.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 11 Oct 2023 19:49:37 -0700 (PDT) X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1779516298188125686 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1779516298188125686 A brief introduction ==================== The NUMA emulation can fake more node base on a single node system, e.g. one node system: [root@localhost ~]# numactl -H available: 1 nodes (0) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 node 0 size: 31788 MB node 0 free: 31446 MB node distances: node 0 0: 10 add numa=fake=2 (fake 2 node on each origin node): [root@localhost ~]# numactl -H available: 2 nodes (0-1) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 node 0 size: 15806 MB node 0 free: 15451 MB node 1 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 node 1 size: 16029 MB node 1 free: 15989 MB node distances: node 0 1 0: 10 10 1: 10 10 As above shown, a new node has been faked. As cpus, the realization of x86 NUMA emulation is kept. Maybe each node should has 4 cores is better (not sure, next to do if so). Why do this =========== It seems has following reasons: (1) In x86 host, apply NUMA emulation can fake more nodes environment to test or verify some performance stuff, but arm64 only has one method that modify ACPI table to do this. It's troublesome more or less. (2) Reduce competition for some locks. Here an example we found: will-it-scale/tlb_flush1_processes -t 96 -s 10, it shows obvious hotspot on lruvec->lock when test in single environment. What's more, The performance improved greatly if test in two more nodes system. The data shows below (more is better): --------------------------------------------------------------------- threads/process | 1 | 12 | 24 | 48 | 96 --------------------------------------------------------------------- one node | 14 1122 | 110 5372 | 111 2615 | 79 7084 | 72 4516 --------------------------------------------------------------------- numa=fake=2 | 14 1168 | 144 4848 | 215 9070 | 157 0412 | 142 3968 --------------------------------------------------------------------- | For concurrency 12, no lruvec->lock hotspot. For 24, hotspot | one node has 24% hotspot on lruvec->lock, but | two nodes env hasn't. --------------------------------------------------------------------- As for risks (e.g. numa balance...), they need to be discussed here. Lastly, this just is a draft, I can improve next if it's acceptable. Thanks! Rongwei Wang (5): mm/numa: move numa emulation APIs into generic files mm: percpu: fix variable type of cpu arch_numa: remove __init in early_cpu_to_node() mm/numa: support CONFIG_NUMA_EMU for arm64 mm/numa: migrate leftover numa emulation into mm/numa.c arch/x86/Kconfig | 8 - arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 3 - arch/x86/mm/Makefile | 1 - arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 216 +------------- arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h | 14 +- drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 7 +- include/asm-generic/numa.h | 33 +++ include/linux/percpu.h | 2 +- mm/Kconfig | 8 + mm/Makefile | 1 + arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c => mm/numa.c | 333 +++++++++++++++++++++- 11 files changed, 373 insertions(+), 253 deletions(-) rename arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c => mm/numa.c (63%)