[0/7] Update RPM ICC bindings

Message ID 20230721-topic-icc_bindings-v1-0-93e2bc728fb7@linaro.org
Headers
Series Update RPM ICC bindings |

Message

Konrad Dybcio July 21, 2023, 1:54 p.m. UTC
  The recent necessary overhaul [1] of how we represent SMD ICC and RPM
bus clocks changed the way they're connected. The bindings however were
not updated to reflect that. This series tries to address that, while
also making the relevant bindings less convoluted.

Now, instead of referencing RPM SMD bus clocks via clocks=<>, they're
handled internally within the interconnect framework (via direct RPM
calls from there). We still need to allow some "interface" clocks,
which are necessary to access some registers and not managed for us.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230526-topic-smd_icc-v7-0-09c78c175546@linaro.org/

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
---
Konrad Dybcio (7):
      dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Introduce qcom,rpm-common
      dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: qcm2290: Remove RPM bus clocks
      dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out MSM8916
      dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out QCS404
      dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out SDM660
      dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out MSM8996
      dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Fix and separate out MSM8939

 .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8916.yaml        |  52 ++++
 .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml        |  74 ++++++
 .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8996.yaml        | 165 ++++++++++++
 .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcm2290.yaml        |  54 +---
 .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,qcs404.yaml         |  52 ++++
 .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpm-common.yaml     |  31 +++
 .../devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,rpm.yaml | 281 ---------------------
 .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm660.yaml         | 131 ++++++++++
 8 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 331 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: ae867bc97b713121b2a7f5fcac68378a0774739b
change-id: 20230721-topic-icc_bindings-72917016f595

Best regards,