[00/15] drm/msm: Add SM6125 MDSS/DPU hardware and enable Sony Xperia 10 II panel

Message ID 20230624-sm6125-dpu-v1-0-1d5a638cebf2@somainline.org
Headers
Series drm/msm: Add SM6125 MDSS/DPU hardware and enable Sony Xperia 10 II panel |

Message

Marijn Suijten June 24, 2023, 12:40 a.m. UTC
  Bring up the SM6125 DPU now that all preliminary series (such as INTF
TE) have been merged (for me to test the hardware properly), and most
other conflicting work (barring ongoing catalog *improvements*) has made
its way in as well or is still being discussed.

The second part of the series complements that by immediately utilizing
this hardware in DT, and even enabling the MDSS/DSI nodes complete with
a 6.0" 1080x2520 panel for Sony's Seine PDX201 (Xperia 10 II).

The last patch ("sm6125-seine: Configure MDSS, DSI and panel") depends
on (an impending v2 of) my Sony panel collection series [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230521-drm-panels-sony-v1-0-541c341d6bee@somainline.org/

---
Marijn Suijten (15):
      arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Sort spmi_bus node numerically by reg
      dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Remove unused GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK
      dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Require GCC PLL0 DIV clock
      dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Allow power-domains property
      dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-controller-main: Document SM6125
      dt-bindings: display/msm: sc7180-dpu: Describe SM6125
      dt-bindings: display/msm: Add SM6125 MDSS
      drm/msm/dpu: Add SM6125 support
      drm/msm/mdss: Add SM6125 support
      dt-bindings: msm: dsi-phy-14nm: Document SM6125 variant
      drm/msm/dsi: Add 14nm phy configuration for SM6125
      arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Switch fixed xo_board clock to RPM XO clock
      arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add dispcc node
      arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add display hardware nodes
      arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-seine: Configure MDSS, DSI and panel

 .../bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml         |  17 +-
 .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml  |   2 +
 .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml         |   1 +
 .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml      |   1 +
 .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6125-mdss.yaml     | 206 +++++++++++++++++
 .../dts/qcom/sm6125-sony-xperia-seine-pdx201.dts   |  59 +++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi               | 244 +++++++++++++++++++--
 .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_4_sm6125.h | 173 +++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c     |   6 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h     |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c            |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c              |   2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h              |   1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c         |  15 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c                     |   8 +
 15 files changed, 712 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 8d2be868b42c08290509c60515865f4de24ea704
change-id: 20230624-sm6125-dpu-aedc9637ee7b

Best regards,
  

Comments

Konrad Dybcio June 24, 2023, 1:42 a.m. UTC | #1
On 24.06.2023 02:40, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> Bring up the SM6125 DPU now that all preliminary series (such as INTF
> TE) have been merged (for me to test the hardware properly)
We should not repeat the same mistake in the future.. Finding a
balance between releasing early and releasing what we can declare
working and tested code is hard, but we waaaaaaaay overstayed on
this one..

Konrad
, and most
> other conflicting work (barring ongoing catalog *improvements*) has made
> its way in as well or is still being discussed.

> 
> The second part of the series complements that by immediately utilizing
> this hardware in DT, and even enabling the MDSS/DSI nodes complete with
> a 6.0" 1080x2520 panel for Sony's Seine PDX201 (Xperia 10 II).
> 
> The last patch ("sm6125-seine: Configure MDSS, DSI and panel") depends
> on (an impending v2 of) my Sony panel collection series [1].
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230521-drm-panels-sony-v1-0-541c341d6bee@somainline.org/
> 
> ---
> Marijn Suijten (15):
>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Sort spmi_bus node numerically by reg
>       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Remove unused GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK
>       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Require GCC PLL0 DIV clock
>       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Allow power-domains property
>       dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-controller-main: Document SM6125
>       dt-bindings: display/msm: sc7180-dpu: Describe SM6125
>       dt-bindings: display/msm: Add SM6125 MDSS
>       drm/msm/dpu: Add SM6125 support
>       drm/msm/mdss: Add SM6125 support
>       dt-bindings: msm: dsi-phy-14nm: Document SM6125 variant
>       drm/msm/dsi: Add 14nm phy configuration for SM6125
>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Switch fixed xo_board clock to RPM XO clock
>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add dispcc node
>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add display hardware nodes
>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-seine: Configure MDSS, DSI and panel
> 
>  .../bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml         |  17 +-
>  .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml  |   2 +
>  .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml         |   1 +
>  .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml      |   1 +
>  .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6125-mdss.yaml     | 206 +++++++++++++++++
>  .../dts/qcom/sm6125-sony-xperia-seine-pdx201.dts   |  59 +++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi               | 244 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_4_sm6125.h | 173 +++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c     |   6 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h     |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c            |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c              |   2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h              |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c         |  15 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c                     |   8 +
>  15 files changed, 712 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 8d2be868b42c08290509c60515865f4de24ea704
> change-id: 20230624-sm6125-dpu-aedc9637ee7b
> 
> Best regards,
  
Marijn Suijten June 25, 2023, 7:18 p.m. UTC | #2
On 2023-06-24 03:42:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 24.06.2023 02:40, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > Bring up the SM6125 DPU now that all preliminary series (such as INTF
> > TE) have been merged (for me to test the hardware properly)
> We should not repeat the same mistake in the future.. Finding a
> balance between releasing early and releasing what we can declare
> working and tested code is hard, but we waaaaaaaay overstayed on
> this one..

I don't understand what you mean by "mistake" at all.  Yes the DPU
catalog portion of this series sat in my local branch for a very long
time.  Yes it had to be rebased on top of conflicts many many times.

However, that time has also been used to fix and extend DPU where
necessary, instead of submitting a half-broken or half-incomplete
catalog entry...

Re "we overstayed": you could have asked to clean up and send my patch,
so I don't take this as a mistake on my part as you are completely aware
of my time schedule ;)

> Konrad
> , and most

Also here, don't forget to re-quote my message if you break half-way in
the line.

> > other conflicting work (barring ongoing catalog *improvements*) has made
> > its way in as well or is still being discussed.
> 
> > 
> > The second part of the series complements that by immediately utilizing
> > this hardware in DT, and even enabling the MDSS/DSI nodes complete with
> > a 6.0" 1080x2520 panel for Sony's Seine PDX201 (Xperia 10 II).
> > 
> > The last patch ("sm6125-seine: Configure MDSS, DSI and panel") depends
> > on (an impending v2 of) my Sony panel collection series [1].
> > 
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230521-drm-panels-sony-v1-0-541c341d6bee@somainline.org/
> > 
> > ---
> > Marijn Suijten (15):
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Sort spmi_bus node numerically by reg
> >       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Remove unused GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK
> >       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Require GCC PLL0 DIV clock
> >       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Allow power-domains property
> >       dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-controller-main: Document SM6125
> >       dt-bindings: display/msm: sc7180-dpu: Describe SM6125
> >       dt-bindings: display/msm: Add SM6125 MDSS
> >       drm/msm/dpu: Add SM6125 support
> >       drm/msm/mdss: Add SM6125 support
> >       dt-bindings: msm: dsi-phy-14nm: Document SM6125 variant
> >       drm/msm/dsi: Add 14nm phy configuration for SM6125
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Switch fixed xo_board clock to RPM XO clock
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add dispcc node
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add display hardware nodes
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-seine: Configure MDSS, DSI and panel
> > 
> >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml         |  17 +-
> >  .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml  |   2 +
> >  .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml         |   1 +
> >  .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml      |   1 +
> >  .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6125-mdss.yaml     | 206 +++++++++++++++++
> >  .../dts/qcom/sm6125-sony-xperia-seine-pdx201.dts   |  59 +++++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi               | 244 +++++++++++++++++++--
> >  .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_4_sm6125.h | 173 +++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c     |   6 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h     |   1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c            |   1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c              |   2 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h              |   1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c         |  15 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c                     |   8 +
> >  15 files changed, 712 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: 8d2be868b42c08290509c60515865f4de24ea704
> > change-id: 20230624-sm6125-dpu-aedc9637ee7b
> > 
> > Best regards,
  
Konrad Dybcio June 26, 2023, 9:41 a.m. UTC | #3
On 25.06.2023 21:18, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-06-24 03:42:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 24.06.2023 02:40, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> Bring up the SM6125 DPU now that all preliminary series (such as INTF
>>> TE) have been merged (for me to test the hardware properly)
>> We should not repeat the same mistake in the future.. Finding a
>> balance between releasing early and releasing what we can declare
>> working and tested code is hard, but we waaaaaaaay overstayed on
>> this one..
> 
> I don't understand what you mean by "mistake" at all.  Yes the DPU
> catalog portion of this series sat in my local branch for a very long
> time.  Yes it had to be rebased on top of conflicts many many times.
> 
> However, that time has also been used to fix and extend DPU where
> necessary, instead of submitting a half-broken or half-incomplete
> catalog entry...
> 
> Re "we overstayed": you could have asked to clean up and send my patch,
> so I don't take this as a mistake on my part as you are completely aware
> of my time schedule ;)
I didn't mean to pick on you. I just wanted to emphasize that a more
upstream-forward approach would have saved us quite some time on the
rebasing and cleaning-up front.



> 
>> Konrad
>> , and most
> 
> Also here, don't forget to re-quote my message if you break half-way in
> the line.
Ugh. All the time I've been doing this I thought thunderfox was smart
enough to do it for me. Apparently not and you're the 1st one to point
that out.

Konrad
> 
>>> other conflicting work (barring ongoing catalog *improvements*) has made
>>> its way in as well or is still being discussed.
>>
>>>
>>> The second part of the series complements that by immediately utilizing
>>> this hardware in DT, and even enabling the MDSS/DSI nodes complete with
>>> a 6.0" 1080x2520 panel for Sony's Seine PDX201 (Xperia 10 II).
>>>
>>> The last patch ("sm6125-seine: Configure MDSS, DSI and panel") depends
>>> on (an impending v2 of) my Sony panel collection series [1].
>>>
>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230521-drm-panels-sony-v1-0-541c341d6bee@somainline.org/
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Marijn Suijten (15):
>>>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Sort spmi_bus node numerically by reg
>>>       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Remove unused GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK
>>>       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Require GCC PLL0 DIV clock
>>>       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Allow power-domains property
>>>       dt-bindings: display/msm: dsi-controller-main: Document SM6125
>>>       dt-bindings: display/msm: sc7180-dpu: Describe SM6125
>>>       dt-bindings: display/msm: Add SM6125 MDSS
>>>       drm/msm/dpu: Add SM6125 support
>>>       drm/msm/mdss: Add SM6125 support
>>>       dt-bindings: msm: dsi-phy-14nm: Document SM6125 variant
>>>       drm/msm/dsi: Add 14nm phy configuration for SM6125
>>>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Switch fixed xo_board clock to RPM XO clock
>>>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add dispcc node
>>>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add display hardware nodes
>>>       arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-seine: Configure MDSS, DSI and panel
>>>
>>>  .../bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.yaml         |  17 +-
>>>  .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml  |   2 +
>>>  .../bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml         |   1 +
>>>  .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml      |   1 +
>>>  .../bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6125-mdss.yaml     | 206 +++++++++++++++++
>>>  .../dts/qcom/sm6125-sony-xperia-seine-pdx201.dts   |  59 +++++
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi               | 244 +++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_4_sm6125.h | 173 +++++++++++++++
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c     |   6 +
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h     |   1 +
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c            |   1 +
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c              |   2 +
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h              |   1 +
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_14nm.c         |  15 ++
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c                     |   8 +
>>>  15 files changed, 712 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>> ---
>>> base-commit: 8d2be868b42c08290509c60515865f4de24ea704
>>> change-id: 20230624-sm6125-dpu-aedc9637ee7b
>>>
>>> Best regards,
  
Marijn Suijten June 26, 2023, 2:17 p.m. UTC | #4
On 2023-06-26 11:41:39, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 25.06.2023 21:18, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2023-06-24 03:42:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> On 24.06.2023 02:40, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> >>> Bring up the SM6125 DPU now that all preliminary series (such as INTF
> >>> TE) have been merged (for me to test the hardware properly)
> >> We should not repeat the same mistake in the future.. Finding a
> >> balance between releasing early and releasing what we can declare
> >> working and tested code is hard, but we waaaaaaaay overstayed on
> >> this one..
> > 
> > I don't understand what you mean by "mistake" at all.  Yes the DPU
> > catalog portion of this series sat in my local branch for a very long
> > time.  Yes it had to be rebased on top of conflicts many many times.
> > 
> > However, that time has also been used to fix and extend DPU where
> > necessary, instead of submitting a half-broken or half-incomplete
> > catalog entry...
> > 
> > Re "we overstayed": you could have asked to clean up and send my patch,
> > so I don't take this as a mistake on my part as you are completely aware
> > of my time schedule ;)
> I didn't mean to pick on you. I just wanted to emphasize that a more
> upstream-forward approach would have saved us quite some time on the
> rebasing and cleaning-up front.

That is how it comes across ;) - our dream is all about upstream-first
but as you know this becomes a mess really quickly when things are
blocked on dependencies and you're working on 5 different features and
testing across ±8 different Sony platforms on ±14 different devices at
once... all in a limited portion of free time.

Fwiw cleaning-up would have had to happen either way, and would have
taken the same amount of time regardless of whether this series is
submitted now or two months ago.

> >> Konrad
> >> , and most
> > 
> > Also here, don't forget to re-quote my message if you break half-way in
> > the line.
> Ugh. All the time I've been doing this I thought thunderfox was smart
> enough to do it for me. Apparently not and you're the 1st one to point
> that out.

You're welcome!
(Though I thought it should be visible in Thunderburd, unless you're not
 in plaintext mode?  Does it still show the "this is quoted" line in
 front of the broken sentence?)

 - Marijn
  
Konrad Dybcio June 26, 2023, 2:20 p.m. UTC | #5
On 26.06.2023 16:17, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-06-26 11:41:39, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 25.06.2023 21:18, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> On 2023-06-24 03:42:46, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 24.06.2023 02:40, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>>>> Bring up the SM6125 DPU now that all preliminary series (such as INTF
>>>>> TE) have been merged (for me to test the hardware properly)
>>>> We should not repeat the same mistake in the future.. Finding a
>>>> balance between releasing early and releasing what we can declare
>>>> working and tested code is hard, but we waaaaaaaay overstayed on
>>>> this one..
>>>
>>> I don't understand what you mean by "mistake" at all.  Yes the DPU
>>> catalog portion of this series sat in my local branch for a very long
>>> time.  Yes it had to be rebased on top of conflicts many many times.
>>>
>>> However, that time has also been used to fix and extend DPU where
>>> necessary, instead of submitting a half-broken or half-incomplete
>>> catalog entry...
>>>
>>> Re "we overstayed": you could have asked to clean up and send my patch,
>>> so I don't take this as a mistake on my part as you are completely aware
>>> of my time schedule ;)
>> I didn't mean to pick on you. I just wanted to emphasize that a more
>> upstream-forward approach would have saved us quite some time on the
>> rebasing and cleaning-up front.
> 
> That is how it comes across ;) - our dream is all about upstream-first
> but as you know this becomes a mess really quickly when things are
> blocked on dependencies and you're working on 5 different features and
> testing across ±8 different Sony platforms on ±14 different devices at
> once... all in a limited portion of free time.
> 
> Fwiw cleaning-up would have had to happen either way, and would have
> taken the same amount of time regardless of whether this series is
> submitted now or two months ago.
> 
>>>> Konrad
>>>> , and most
>>>
>>> Also here, don't forget to re-quote my message if you break half-way in
>>> the line.
>> Ugh. All the time I've been doing this I thought thunderfox was smart
>> enough to do it for me. Apparently not and you're the 1st one to point
>> that out.
> 
> You're welcome!
> (Though I thought it should be visible in Thunderburd, unless you're not
>  in plaintext mode?  Does it still show the "this is quoted" line in
>  front of the broken sentence?)
It doesn't, but the text stays blue (as if it was)

Konrad
> 
>  - Marijn