Message ID | 20230216081802.38007-1-wyes.karny@amd.com |
---|---|
Headers |
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:adf:eb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id s9csp176688wrn; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:21:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8tTgdNe2adA2P88hgnWWqVX1OXLv0nPj8LDtuCmJacx3ngM1RLQxSCoETso8iZKAX4HB4z X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:3710:b0:be:bed4:4f73 with SMTP id yl16-20020a056a21371000b000bebed44f73mr4072692pzb.21.1676535691638; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:21:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1676535691; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PGoB9d7/klwUNadx5rovjhACoFGJCrlVhQATWXkXjz0uSajvr7kKd5abZu+6Kinouz dDd/XihB3B3F387Uo3/34Vn8VfI1GCe3RzJbtPRCEIZylTA7ANpzFsvZuHoz4KloCRuX 3Z8lXeuc5PLdOm/n7BfRa0eu7HDsF1Lbcd8iVZFY6XJP+7HaL0tu2M36cAmfnnR5JI9q Qryx92Fu72CdWZP/6msUOZkPf/anGhCKtQQTBEQmoym0V0TZFqGfVrXtBYp6RmXUyndT PeQtHuHw3xTs1wPkOvCwAkzBurMXTyKu+j+y+rfmoUPpLJuyFQ6noUW5wbb/0Xai8GX2 odDQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=kdxzbMR1RLITAVEUbuAu2zn2b5m8v19/BpE3vhbc5So=; b=BnnwNZQgeiVyYkz19fdOMeph2EYNnmfm05jxzxC02PA0tqLjNEjEvTLeCkeT4I2k40 3wqFDP8MyZo1Xu3JhPl/3s/JRhZ4bChxOvI0kCLLFkPl3TooAXvl/WxUDFNe/FsUHHYY ioHvgPGPJi6aNPeVIfLc1lXF6zmSHnqJMgdLPrHNrCzjtYiXL3v+syuHbUYJqhkdorjh 6z2fNuleu4jt50I6yzz6M4UyozF8hxvU3+BEiR4htF6n/HhZywz2W7aXjzrWLX5GzxcA t6fb5Jomiw5pJ0H5+A1wkp5apCr/F3IeNEr3phDcDKwn0OFdPrmZD6DUYfgNGxYKQ0dn xi+g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amd.com header.s=selector1 header.b=y5LWUhff; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=amd.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=amd.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amd.com Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b23-20020a631b17000000b00479018c4634si1079794pgb.671.2023.02.16.00.21.18; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amd.com header.s=selector1 header.b=y5LWUhff; arc=pass (i=1 spf=pass spfdomain=amd.com dmarc=pass fromdomain=amd.com); spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amd.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229651AbjBPISe (ORCPT <rfc822;hadasmailinglist@gmail.com> + 99 others); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 03:18:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44776 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229483AbjBPISc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 03:18:32 -0500 Received: from NAM04-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam04on2087.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.102.87]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3E526CC3; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:18:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=djZFQ2yfp3vUXuQlLh6pDcp6ryVrxuIIHe+pK/HMvQ8ibi4jFOFZql6B5s6Ij5cC/AUazFhKodaHa2ODGcUlJN+0EHz23coHK/Smi5CaZfX9eLgr4/y1EtF8PlNCl40hCAc42SKUrJL99a+AwrPTOsOuuvuR5fnXRgaaIwtKBZxoYJ/EklVNgUDJnV1SES+da05SXnuCQUkrTuF/kkOiXoU6A2F69GowaQ/onEYOKyxeQ8dl+8H4fwx9+b4y47w5Z577jURetWc1UGsjYtjZ3VtihgXGtZ1kqPsgX+0+gFxpJP7YqZTEloBa9YGE8tEkf65cMVzr++FtAt2C+3u82g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=kdxzbMR1RLITAVEUbuAu2zn2b5m8v19/BpE3vhbc5So=; b=AVyaVOMm5uWvu+9fYTs9evUqYCApLAyBueMkl1na78LCIj+IyiasL2oUNawNrwgAb5KayS8tORTUPw/yO9wOh77uK/EXIAfyBn9RdbPVdKPMZxCQSJllqPxZ+b/mBT9nJAqOSYqSmOWgCNO1D6Suy5rRcET9se7RbTCdRiFvEYef6n8FLERfoB3uwtqngnLV5hJl2FkluxSNHFNvBRtMPlyGBMRtTq98SFVOuDXzbSDQEjkZKFeW8+SrHcwMyILep8VxB4Wow4ELKuhoOlJwR1VMT7XhHuzotmiRMiUMnl/q8fMmhgLso4qqs9PN8ZGwSuMmesZQxk9ZaofEvDEZ1g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amd.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kdxzbMR1RLITAVEUbuAu2zn2b5m8v19/BpE3vhbc5So=; b=y5LWUhfffe9FiSC9pFUNfHwPdJTqFIJv49qIGzuVlj84cd025LrSO5UeJg7iY9exlM1PlN6B4Epi/UIF6SVb3bJM6Y5e122V0VmYMMb5aIvvOwwwei9UW/1CrNVmJRqHuQQoJF6B5QVj0/VdFVbQ8JdVBhhkTwewCSzMNEjWRYg= Received: from BN0PR03CA0025.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e6::30) by SA3PR12MB7808.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:31b::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6111.13; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:18:24 +0000 Received: from BN8NAM11FT034.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:e6:cafe::b7) by BN0PR03CA0025.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:408:e6::30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6086.26 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:18:23 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 165.204.84.17) smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=amd.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of amd.com designates 165.204.84.17 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=165.204.84.17; helo=SATLEXMB04.amd.com; pr=C Received: from SATLEXMB04.amd.com (165.204.84.17) by BN8NAM11FT034.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.176.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.20.6111.13 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:18:23 +0000 Received: from beas.amd.com (10.180.168.240) by SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.34; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 02:18:18 -0600 From: Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> To: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>, Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>, <Perry.Yuan@amd.com> CC: <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>, <santosh.shukla@amd.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@amd.com>, <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>, Tor Vic <torvic9@mailbox.org>, Russell Haley <yumpusamongus@gmail.com>, Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com> Subject: [PATCH v7 0/6] cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided autonomous mode support Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:17:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20230216081802.38007-1-wyes.karny@amd.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.180.168.240] X-ClientProxiedBy: SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) To SATLEXMB04.amd.com (10.181.40.145) X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BN8NAM11FT034:EE_|SA3PR12MB7808:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 82ba426f-4cf0-4f22-94e8-08db0ff65f4e X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: kYCqUQwyz9uLqabnpoHx0eMaGXEVRiaQMxTrGFTJQGsIbRWxjkmob5Tzzp6YFpd15p5CBx0Bojyfz5rjWSLGPUQpnCcQWd85nzErA0RZxUVPDogFlbqYJZ7yf4EGUQQ3or0S+2bU6lxq5x/uBuV8GdbW0BES3zXfnto7CxF3ETfPUJVdnSjhqAJDusj4+BqmfKlpW+YLttB9QHrH4Herh4SI3nEz+cGFYl6I9kt1kWNttnqqzXocBNCcg9eGZoBUdE0KPIjWs92yz8AMnGXXO36pRbZG+KednHVfFGuDtivWA6Aee/KV3dd9iu/EuaoNDJM4Qqg1wygZ83NEVpEg/bUtoTCtY82Sql0lAaHAlk4+h0P/qKjiBcXfwQbavLZF9otL1uHd5Wuot9QPLFSbhTNKQJQXx8iopknFYLgD8pvVC23+LZrR2QIbAGVnELc82XLv4X+mLqkBLQCMvuf0Fn5NobsCJAx+/i2jySq+Kafb+yomSsR48hI82ZLin8NlOK0LPyiS9OwL3yGD5X7hRTBxMg/xSn5AxO/bxjBAo7eL67qXUmfVQaQYQNcMQGYKjFBxP1Kx3rFIFR9nDbI5ZJ1JDg2OVfp1RrKHFK83mmkq73X+b4rETfkoPbzzkWu1/FFMPr7SoxyMhz00QDbH5YspJzAzsqTlkFnjExgd2FXUh0wnfi+ZfXYAozLmidlTSB6YJ+UuAMgJiKqmp5nZJR/gBDWbj9DAk49ZVSczjleyV5xFGRiqZg6Yftmf73Z8ccXU+wcfBEqKCUrS7vnIZw== X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:165.204.84.17;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:CAL;SFV:NSPM;H:SATLEXMB04.amd.com;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230025)(4636009)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(451199018)(36840700001)(46966006)(40470700004)(7696005)(478600001)(966005)(36860700001)(40480700001)(426003)(47076005)(83380400001)(356005)(82310400005)(86362001)(82740400003)(81166007)(6666004)(1076003)(336012)(36756003)(26005)(186003)(16526019)(40460700003)(2616005)(316002)(70586007)(70206006)(8676002)(5660300002)(7416002)(4326008)(6636002)(8936002)(54906003)(110136005)(41300700001)(44832011)(2906002)(36900700001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2023 08:18:23.7945 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 82ba426f-4cf0-4f22-94e8-08db0ff65f4e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3dd8961f-e488-4e60-8e11-a82d994e183d;Ip=[165.204.84.17];Helo=[SATLEXMB04.amd.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BN8NAM11FT034.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA3PR12MB7808 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FORGED_SPF_HELO, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1757975089131634465?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1757975089131634465?= |
Series |
cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided autonomous mode support
|
|
Message
Wyes Karny
Feb. 16, 2023, 8:17 a.m. UTC
From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined: 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/ performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform follows that. 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an operating frequency in this range. 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously scales the frequency. Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2). In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity. To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line parameter has to be passed in the kernel. Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch: System: Genoa 96C 192T Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v12 + patch Scaling governor: schedutil ================ dbench comparisons ================ dbench result comparison: Here results are throughput (MB/s) Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct) 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct) 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct) 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct) 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct) 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct) 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct) 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct) 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct) dbench power comparison: Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct) 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct) 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct) 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct) 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct) 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct) 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct) 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct) ================ git-source comparisons ================ git-source result comparison: Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) git-source power comparison: Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct) ================ kernbench comparisons ================ kernbench result comparison: Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct) 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct) 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct) 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct) 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct) 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct) kernbench power comparison: Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct) 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct) 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct) 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct) 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) ================ tbench comparisons ================ tbench result comparison: Here results are throughput (MB/s) Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct) 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct) 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct) 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct) 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct) 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct) 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct) 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct) 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct) 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct) tbench power comparison: Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct) 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct) 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct) 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct) 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct) 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct) 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct) 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct) 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) Note: this series is based on top of EPP v12 [3] series Change log: v6 -> v7: - Addressed comments by Ray - Reorder and rebase patches - Pick up Ack by Ray v5 -> v6: - Don't return -EBUSY when changing to same mode v4 -> v5: - Rebased on top of EPP v12 series - Addressed comments form Mario regarding documentation - Picked up RB flags from Mario and Bagas Sanjaya v3 -> v4: - Fixed active mode low frequency issue reported by Peter Jung and Tor Vic - Documentation modification suggested by Bagas Sanjaya v2 -> v3: - Addressed review comments form Mario. - Picked up RB tag from Mario. - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3]. v1 -> v2: - Fix issue with shared mem systems. - Rebase on top of EPP series. [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221110175847.3098728-1-Perry.Yuan@amd.com/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20230131090016.3970625-1-perry.yuan@amd.com/ Wyes Karny (6): acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: Move amd_pstate param to alphabetical order cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided autonomous mode cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for guided .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 40 ++-- Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 31 ++- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 121 +++++++++++- drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 177 +++++++++++++----- include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 11 ++ include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 2 + 6 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
Comments
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 04:17:56PM +0800, Karny, Wyes wrote: > From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined: > 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/ > performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform > follows that. > 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max > frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and > `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an > operating frequency in this range. > 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required > energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously > scales the frequency. > > Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is > implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2). > > In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the > scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends > on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity. > > To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line > parameter has to be passed in the kernel. > > Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch: > System: Genoa 96C 192T > Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v12 + patch > Scaling governor: schedutil > > ================ dbench comparisons ================ > dbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (MB/s) > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) > 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct) > 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct) > 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct) > 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct) > 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct) > 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct) > 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct) > 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct) > 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct) > dbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct) > 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct) > 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) > 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) > 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct) > 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct) > 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct) > 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct) > 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct) > 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct) > > ================ git-source comparisons ================ > git-source result comparison: > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) > git-source power comparison: > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct) > > ================ kernbench comparisons ================ > kernbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) > Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) > 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct) > 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct) > 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct) > 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct) > 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct) > 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) > 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct) > kernbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) > 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct) > 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct) > 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct) > 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct) > 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > > ================ tbench comparisons ================ > tbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (MB/s) > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct) > 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct) > 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct) > 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct) > 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct) > 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct) > 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct) > 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct) > 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct) > 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct) > tbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct) > 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct) > 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct) > 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct) > 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct) > 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct) > 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct) > 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) > 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct) > 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) > > Note: this series is based on top of EPP v12 [3] series > > Change log: > > v6 -> v7: > - Addressed comments by Ray > - Reorder and rebase patches > - Pick up Ack by Ray > > v5 -> v6: > - Don't return -EBUSY when changing to same mode > > v4 -> v5: > - Rebased on top of EPP v12 series > - Addressed comments form Mario regarding documentation > - Picked up RB flags from Mario and Bagas Sanjaya > > v3 -> v4: > - Fixed active mode low frequency issue reported by Peter Jung and Tor Vic > - Documentation modification suggested by Bagas Sanjaya > > v2 -> v3: > - Addressed review comments form Mario. > - Picked up RB tag from Mario. > - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3]. > > v1 -> v2: > - Fix issue with shared mem systems. > - Rebase on top of EPP series. > > [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221110175847.3098728-1-Perry.Yuan@amd.com/ > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20230131090016.3970625-1-perry.yuan@amd.com/ > > Wyes Karny (6): > acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support > acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support > Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: Move amd_pstate param to > alphabetical order > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided autonomous mode > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs > Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for > guided > > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 40 ++-- > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 31 ++- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 121 +++++++++++- > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 177 +++++++++++++----- > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 11 ++ > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 2 + > 6 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) > Hi Rafael, Could you please apply these series into 6.3 or please kindly let us know if you have any comments? Thanks, Ray
Hello. On čtvrtek 16. února 2023 9:17:56 CET Wyes Karny wrote: > >From ACPI spec[1] below 3 modes for CPPC can be defined: > 1. Non autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies operating frequency/ > performance level through `Desired Performance` register and platform > follows that. > 2. Guided autonomous: OS scaling governor specifies min and max > frequencies/ performance levels through `Minimum Performance` and > `Maximum Performance` register, and platform can autonomously select an > operating frequency in this range. > 3. Fully autonomous: OS only hints (via EPP) to platform for the required > energy performance preference for the workload and platform autonomously > scales the frequency. > > Currently (1) is supported by amd_pstate as passive mode, and (3) is > implemented by EPP support[2]. This change is to support (2). > > In guided autonomous mode the min_perf is based on the input from the > scaling governor. For example, in case of schedutil this value depends > on the current utilization. And max_perf is set to max capacity. > > To activate guided auto mode ``amd_pstate=guided`` command line > parameter has to be passed in the kernel. > > Below are the results (normalized) of benchmarks with this patch: > System: Genoa 96C 192T > Kernel: 6.2.0-rc2 + EPP v12 + patch > Scaling governor: schedutil > > ================ dbench comparisons ================ > dbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (MB/s) > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) > 2 1.07 (0.00 pct) 1.06 (-0.93 pct) 1.07 (0.00 pct) > 4 1.68 (0.00 pct) 1.70 (1.19 pct) 1.72 (2.38 pct) > 8 2.61 (0.00 pct) 2.68 (2.68 pct) 2.76 (5.74 pct) > 16 4.16 (0.00 pct) 4.24 (1.92 pct) 4.53 (8.89 pct) > 32 5.98 (0.00 pct) 6.17 (3.17 pct) 7.30 (22.07 pct) > 64 8.67 (0.00 pct) 8.99 (3.69 pct) 10.71 (23.52 pct) > 128 11.98 (0.00 pct) 12.52 (4.50 pct) 14.67 (22.45 pct) > 256 15.73 (0.00 pct) 16.13 (2.54 pct) 17.81 (13.22 pct) > 512 15.77 (0.00 pct) 16.32 (3.48 pct) 16.39 (3.93 pct) > dbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (4.00 pct) > 2 0.99 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-2.02 pct) 1.02 (3.03 pct) > 4 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.98 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) > 8 0.98 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (1.02 pct) 1.02 (4.08 pct) > 16 0.99 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (1.01 pct) 1.04 (5.05 pct) > 32 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.02 (0.00 pct) 1.07 (4.90 pct) > 64 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.05 (0.00 pct) 1.11 (5.71 pct) > 128 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.08 (0.00 pct) 1.15 (6.48 pct) > 256 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.12 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (7.14 pct) > 512 1.18 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (-0.84 pct) 1.26 (6.77 pct) > > ================ git-source comparisons ================ > git-source result comparison: > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.93 (-7.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) > git-source power comparison: > Threads: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 192 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.96 (-4.00 pct) > > ================ kernbench comparisons ================ > kernbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (compilations per 1000 sec) > Load: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 1.01 (1.00 pct) 1.02 (2.00 pct) > 48 1.26 (0.00 pct) 1.28 (1.58 pct) 1.25 (-0.79 pct) > 64 1.39 (0.00 pct) 1.47 (5.75 pct) 1.43 (2.87 pct) > 96 1.48 (0.00 pct) 1.50 (1.35 pct) 1.49 (0.67 pct) > 128 1.29 (0.00 pct) 1.32 (2.32 pct) 1.33 (3.10 pct) > 192 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) 1.21 (3.41 pct) > 256 1.17 (0.00 pct) 1.18 (0.85 pct) 1.20 (2.56 pct) > 384 1.16 (0.00 pct) 1.17 (0.86 pct) 1.21 (4.31 pct) > kernbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 32 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.00 (0.00 pct) > 48 0.87 (0.00 pct) 0.81 (-6.89 pct) 0.88 (1.14 pct) > 64 0.81 (0.00 pct) 0.73 (-9.87 pct) 0.77 (-4.93 pct) > 96 0.75 (0.00 pct) 0.74 (-1.33 pct) 0.75 (0.00 pct) > 128 0.83 (0.00 pct) 0.79 (-4.81 pct) 0.83 (0.00 pct) > 192 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > 256 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > 384 0.92 (0.00 pct) 0.88 (-4.34 pct) 0.92 (0.00 pct) > > ================ tbench comparisons ================ > tbench result comparison: > Here results are throughput (MB/s) > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.70 (-30.00 pct) 1.37 (37.00 pct) > 2 2.64 (0.00 pct) 1.39 (-47.34 pct) 2.70 (2.27 pct) > 4 4.89 (0.00 pct) 2.75 (-43.76 pct) 5.28 (7.97 pct) > 8 9.46 (0.00 pct) 5.42 (-42.70 pct) 10.22 (8.03 pct) > 16 19.05 (0.00 pct) 10.42 (-45.30 pct) 19.94 (4.67 pct) > 32 37.50 (0.00 pct) 20.23 (-46.05 pct) 36.87 (-1.68 pct) > 64 61.24 (0.00 pct) 43.08 (-29.65 pct) 62.96 (2.80 pct) > 128 67.16 (0.00 pct) 69.08 (2.85 pct) 67.34 (0.26 pct) > 256 154.59 (0.00 pct) 162.33 (5.00 pct) 156.78 (1.41 pct) > 512 154.02 (0.00 pct) 156.74 (1.76 pct) 153.48 (-0.35 pct) > tbench power comparison: > Clients: acpi-cpufreq amd_pst+passive amd_pst+guided > 1 1.00 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-3.00 pct) 1.08 (8.00 pct) > 2 1.04 (0.00 pct) 0.97 (-6.73 pct) 1.11 (6.73 pct) > 4 1.12 (0.00 pct) 0.99 (-11.60 pct) 1.18 (5.35 pct) > 8 1.25 (0.00 pct) 1.04 (-16.80 pct) 1.31 (4.80 pct) > 16 1.53 (0.00 pct) 1.13 (-26.14 pct) 1.58 (3.26 pct) > 32 2.01 (0.00 pct) 1.36 (-32.33 pct) 2.03 (0.99 pct) > 64 2.58 (0.00 pct) 2.14 (-17.05 pct) 2.61 (1.16 pct) > 128 2.80 (0.00 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) 2.81 (0.35 pct) > 256 3.39 (0.00 pct) 3.43 (1.17 pct) 3.42 (0.88 pct) > 512 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) 3.44 (0.00 pct) > > Note: this series is based on top of EPP v12 [3] series > > Change log: > > v6 -> v7: > - Addressed comments by Ray > - Reorder and rebase patches > - Pick up Ack by Ray > > v5 -> v6: > - Don't return -EBUSY when changing to same mode > > v4 -> v5: > - Rebased on top of EPP v12 series > - Addressed comments form Mario regarding documentation > - Picked up RB flags from Mario and Bagas Sanjaya > > v3 -> v4: > - Fixed active mode low frequency issue reported by Peter Jung and Tor Vic > - Documentation modification suggested by Bagas Sanjaya > > v2 -> v3: > - Addressed review comments form Mario. > - Picked up RB tag from Mario. > - Rebase on top of EPP v11 [3]. > > v1 -> v2: > - Fix issue with shared mem systems. > - Rebase on top of EPP series. > > [1]: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221110175847.3098728-1-Perry.Yuan@amd.com/ > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20230131090016.3970625-1-perry.yuan@amd.com/ > > Wyes Karny (6): > acpi: cppc: Add min and max perf reg writing support > acpi: cppc: Add auto select register read/write support > Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: Move amd_pstate param to > alphabetical order > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided autonomous mode > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Add guided mode control support via sysfs > Documentation: cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd_pstate status sysfs for > guided > > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 40 ++-- > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 31 ++- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 121 +++++++++++- > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 177 +++++++++++++----- > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 11 ++ > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 2 + > 6 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) ``` $ lscpu | grep 'Model name' Model name: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor $ cat /proc/cmdline root=/dev/mapper/system threadirqs io_delay=none zswap.enabled=0 amd_pstate=guided quiet $ sudo cpupower frequency-info analyzing CPU 0: driver: amd-pstate CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0 maximum transition latency: 20.0 us hardware limits: 550 MHz - 5.08 GHz available cpufreq governors: conservative ondemand userspace powersave performance schedutil current policy: frequency should be within 550 MHz and 5.08 GHz. The governor "schedutil" may decide which speed to use within this range. current CPU frequency: Unable to call hardware current CPU frequency: 3.95 GHz (asserted by call to kernel) boost state support: Supported: yes Active: yes AMD PSTATE Highest Performance: 166. Maximum Frequency: 5.08 GHz. AMD PSTATE Nominal Performance: 111. Nominal Frequency: 3.40 GHz. AMD PSTATE Lowest Non-linear Performance: 57. Lowest Non-linear Frequency: 1.74 GHz. AMD PSTATE Lowest Performance: 19. Lowest Frequency: 550 MHz. ``` Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name> Thank you.