Regenerate some autotools generated files (Was: Re: [PATCH v3] configure: Implement --enable-host-pie)
Checks
Commit Message
On Fri, Jun 16 2023, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:26:23PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 15 2023, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:06:43PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 6/5/23 10:18, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> >> > Ping. Anyone have any further comments?
>> >> Given this was approved before, but got reverted due to issues (which have
>> >> since been addressed) -- I think you might as well go forward and sooner
>> >> rather than later so that we can catch fallout earlier.
>> >
>> > Thanks, pushed now, after rebasing, adjusting the patch for
>> > r14-1385, and testing with and without --enable-host-pie on
>> > both Debian and Fedora.
>> >
>> > If something comes up and I can't fix it quickly enough, I'll
>> > have to revert the patch. We'll see.
>> >
>>
>> The script that regularly checks that the checked-in autotools-generated
>> files are in sync now complain about the following diff. Unless someone
>> stops me because I overlooked something or for some other reason, I will
>> commit it later on as obvious.
>
> Please, go ahead.
>
>> I wonder where the "line" differences come from, perhaps you added a
>> comment after running autoconf/automake/...? The zlib/Makefile.in hunks
>
> Arg, I think I must've messed up the #lines when rebasing though I don't
> know what went wrong with zlib/Makefile.in. But I don't think the latter
> will actually make any difference.
>
>> like something we should have, though, even if I did not check whether
>> it makes any difference in practice. And I want the checking script to
>> shut up too ;-)
>
> Thanks and sorry.
>
No worries, I have committed the following.
Thanks and have a nice weekend,
Martin
As discussed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/621976.html this
should put the autotools generated files in sync to what they were
generated from (and make an automated checker happy).
Tested by bootstrapping on top of only a few revisions ago.
zlib/ChangeLog:
2023-06-16 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Likewise.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-06-16 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
* configure: Regenerate.
---
gcc/configure | 4 ++--
zlib/Makefile.in | 2 ++
zlib/configure | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
@@ -19847,7 +19847,7 @@ else
lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2
lt_status=$lt_dlunknown
cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<_LT_EOF
-#line 19848 "configure"
+#line 19850 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
#if HAVE_DLFCN_H
@@ -19953,7 +19953,7 @@ else
lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2
lt_status=$lt_dlunknown
cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<_LT_EOF
-#line 19954 "configure"
+#line 19956 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
#if HAVE_DLFCN_H
@@ -353,6 +353,8 @@ datadir = @datadir@
datarootdir = @datarootdir@
docdir = @docdir@
dvidir = @dvidir@
+enable_host_pie = @enable_host_pie@
+enable_host_shared = @enable_host_shared@
exec_prefix = @exec_prefix@
host = @host@
host_alias = @host_alias@
@@ -10763,7 +10763,7 @@ else
lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2
lt_status=$lt_dlunknown
cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<_LT_EOF
-#line 10778 "configure"
+#line 10766 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
#if HAVE_DLFCN_H
@@ -10869,7 +10869,7 @@ else
lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2
lt_status=$lt_dlunknown
cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<_LT_EOF
-#line 10884 "configure"
+#line 10872 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
#if HAVE_DLFCN_H