From patchwork Wed Apr 12 02:27:22 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: HAO CHEN GUI X-Patchwork-Id: 82228 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a59:b0ea:0:b0:3b6:4342:cba0 with SMTP id b10csp15769vqo; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:28:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Zv87c33ke+WPJ80pF4xNQBF+Or0Y0WiMdZyiUfTcjwPiGxU01NRa85TbPZ/9RyB/flkq6X X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d0cf:0:b0:4fb:2060:4c20 with SMTP id u15-20020aa7d0cf000000b004fb20604c20mr11298337edo.31.1681266497531; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:28:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681266497; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=crDudv4Um4SqFnpntPkyJXmEJBnrrgUccgEv/oOAZ4l2YPZahbLYU7ptk8+OXRsSOF Ca8XjAcHg03Ctkfo9iWWYgyZ2bOMD5vqIzStkzV4kT80GmoApTqYXNy1I3LC0ojTEvBc aCaSs38f7kWMAquHwfUJ8N9hI4Kg+PE8F7eIZ4OAVG+FsjwiAVJKA+WorOUPUGvQUyuz sjsh5hjzt3AMFWSgseKIiRs5l3iMMZvFn2HpOXyULdUtUIpLyjxC9zj8nl1ZpXDehkmo FrqeQh73EbfE9ie1NAWZaX2lVb/HPNl6gplRkoZl4zKImJZkOHtcmX1ZB0MRMtZELROT +4Ug== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:reply-to:from:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post :list-archive:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:subject:cc:to:content-language:user-agent :date:message-id:dmarc-filter:delivered-to:dkim-signature :dkim-filter; bh=QhYXHnzS+x8bZTnZQk+ZPf4iDZkQ9hlyCquL8up6R6U=; b=0nG/ZORqRFH5oRP8GJg/lectynv9GwabQHNoWRHLrDQX8XX2VWZ6SjirsY7VlT+06Q He5LnOTHaSlimv1V8f5XHjq02fFYQ9F+cYWg0rpDW85XISFDLKPhBlEB96gaTnrsbIXU iuzF0TKMjfeh8sBOHh4/xEJY5JKaZ9CWW7aLu21M410tNb7runNsUW5kmF2Jc4NCvt2Y FhnmWvcI6IyZF8KlxT6LIzeoj/eteDZF0KGd8NXeIjLUb40pmb0+XtMjUWM2iWUa739J awsYmiZJl04f0i2WyX9SJ6rPGDIs29Y0LU7Gi5LOIUw1qszBpu08u/piq+M95pLTMNLe tKnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.s=default header.b=U48i8kVh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gnu.org Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org. [2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u5-20020a056402064500b0050489723a25si1568630edx.466.2023.04.11.19.28.17 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.s=default header.b=U48i8kVh; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 2620:52:3:1:0:246e:9693:128c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gnu.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A173858C60 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:28:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 32A173858C60 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1681266496; bh=QhYXHnzS+x8bZTnZQk+ZPf4iDZkQ9hlyCquL8up6R6U=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From; b=U48i8kVhW/wS8BLJAkTkuP2zARVl12+rueBocX4v0WTYOzWSjF4PAohYilGW2yprF /wVmhpGk+fp7qrO33/r70Owe2n9P/uwjjARfLq6RmzBzPffeRpJoh3H/x6mhSALH0u 0iTOXUMoaf0L8Z7R3sUsy4M6yNCxA6/sdeWYh7nM= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA173858D28 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1EA173858D28 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 33C1hbjo013698; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:31 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pwk7r99tj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:30 +0000 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 33C2L6s8013280; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:29 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pwk7r99sy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:29 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 33C1qKWM007767; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:28 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pu0m1a28f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:28 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 33C2ROd523200474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:24 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6623D2004B; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AE820043; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.200.145.81] (unknown [9.200.145.81]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:27:22 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:27:22 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Content-Language: en-US To: gcc-patches Cc: Segher Boessenkool , David , "Kewen.Lin" , Peter Bergner Subject: [PATCH, rs6000] xfail float128 comparison test case that fails on powerpc64 [PR108728] X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: gqHz-xIOtQAZ-NEXOm0r-_z4FVjO1z_D X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: i7rlWPNyyvLTE8FzjZhkI1T7huPx2Mqa X-Proofpoint-UnRewURL: 0 URL was un-rewritten MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-04-11_16,2023-04-11_02,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303200000 definitions=main-2304120016 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches From: HAO CHEN GUI Reply-To: HAO CHEN GUI Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1762935698389601941?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1762935698389601941?= Hi, This patch xfails a float128 comparison test case on powerpc64 that fails due to a longstanding issue with floating-point compares. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58684 for more information. The patch passed regression test on Power Linux platforms. Thanks Gui Haochen ChangeLog rs6000: xfail float128 comparison test case that fails on powerpc64. This patch xfails a float128 comparison test case on powerpc64 that fails due to a longstanding issue with floating-point compares. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58684 for more information. gcc/testsuite/ PR target/108728 * gcc.dg/torture/float128-cmp-invalid.c: Add xfail. patch.diff diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/float128-cmp-invalid.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/float128-cmp-invalid.c index 1f675efdd61..f52686e0a24 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/float128-cmp-invalid.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/float128-cmp-invalid.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* Test for "invalid" exceptions from __float128 comparisons. */ -/* { dg-do run } */ +/* { dg-do run { xfail { powerpc*-*-* } } } */ /* { dg-options "" } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target __float128 } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target base_quadfloat_support } */