From patchwork Tue Jun 13 08:11:07 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Kewen.Lin" X-Patchwork-Id: 107174 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a59:994d:0:b0:3d9:f83d:47d9 with SMTP id k13csp379006vqr; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 01:12:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5yWCs1r5bCJAJmYM7Dqa960Kv8nGINeqO58eaV8Enekuz2awIYJixFjZzVzAeVXQoYzoQm X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c544:0:b0:514:bcfd:6e2a with SMTP id s4-20020aa7c544000000b00514bcfd6e2amr8625693edr.2.1686643923449; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 01:12:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1686643923; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xPQnnktwowgxG6El0xs6wJ990SiE0EgYjOnrsqxU2xAqxhOvR/aYIS8LznjLoPDmQ6 dlouCdj8x3FFoqi+VEZsW6WSIhw83wCJTobUHwFw7OL5x2ChdqNp6WYRgMQOcgf5OOfz md3NwI7jCogC4dAVzuQTRZM/l6U3UhjHgNdUtIeM/I+QNGaz1O+GqsNUIhfQefwU3y7T c+491Z1+ZKp0sOqdY73q7d0TYSPonkfUZ7kKFdsaG2IwKwR5KyBS0MEK6tAPeLUJw4PQ 775NVWbkA/Q0CjZA9oaLCQWnDRUeE8nAmyFdGlk5QGQOmLXY2MCwtiGba+s32+VYVLoX H8Xg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=sender:errors-to:reply-to:from:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post :list-archive:list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :dmarc-filter:delivered-to:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=gWwyTiCIw2J4b11ALNRDG33SVk7zHbFzsRCoV+6xL5g=; b=VL4ub/UdBGrngDjDNpv/9EatuQg6UPvMaSims3su6TdSuhyyULNguCo4Xz98y+kQgU Otsg5ElYa21sBSdP5U0J/Kz8TCG5100eQQixlt+MmjZaqB/yZeE0x9yGKZE08wVY9VyL j+VEeDiPrfWEcpDODWQVD66njBL+BcvGBMiYD8l4RMd/gla3DDTe7zKtmf3QVVfGFl25 ASHTYxkRCZyvTk/NlCpJSQk2qZCc/ELP3tv+sNd3d61I/4uUU8D3cFQnPSNWCtuvsN6z MkQcTrR5aBk/4ihKqipoWsPZOaSgjdvfPPLdtO1WSt/FS36BS5oKM6k4jyFoIcx43tYb P6Hw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.s=default header.b=qW0IkqVC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 8.43.85.97 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gnu.org Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org. [8.43.85.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q7-20020aa7cc07000000b0051879df964bsi230723edt.25.2023.06.13.01.12.03 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 01:12:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 8.43.85.97 as permitted sender) client-ip=8.43.85.97; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gcc.gnu.org header.s=default header.b=qW0IkqVC; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 8.43.85.97 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gnu.org Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCC73858C1F for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:12:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5CCC73858C1F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1686643922; bh=gWwyTiCIw2J4b11ALNRDG33SVk7zHbFzsRCoV+6xL5g=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=qW0IkqVCrPwmWFQn0mD2564JE6zZrmMFDHMbmtvxe78+iYFD05Cp6pOi43Kvca5X7 NcLTVopUR5yVqm6CGx+yAgu4zwWg6TxJT/xizgtlqjaH1PIzqaZOT4qRqfYQlVHV4v ut+R2NA0VwEXrZpYlU+QUoNnhKEnCAlAP4mHuCtc= X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C6083858D32 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0C6083858D32 Received: from pps.filterd (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 35D80gCR010523; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:16 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3r6mjsgb7v-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:16 +0000 Received: from m0353728.ppops.net (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 35D80n6B010755; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:16 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3r6mjsgb70-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:15 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 35CKjeZO028092; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:13 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3r4gt51ym8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:13 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 35D8BBtH10224338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:11 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E930A2004F; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295E120049; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.177.69.27] (unknown [9.177.69.27]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 08:11:08 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 16:11:07 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: [PATCH, committed] testsuite: Check int128 effective target for pr109932-{1,2}.c [PR110230] Content-Language: en-US To: GCC Patches Cc: Segher Boessenkool , Peter Bergner , David Edelsohn References: <124c676e-27ed-252e-3f33-0f9b370ef08e@linux.ibm.com> <8715f86e-6c97-ce1d-368a-f66469527124@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <8715f86e-6c97-ce1d-368a-f66469527124@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: RdYrlMge2u0bDjv6HGmYCjKCnQ7NknRl X-Proofpoint-GUID: obPOhYFufdwnC96lkYBxfTn_7-FcO-cd X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-06-13_04,2023-06-12_02,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=974 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2305260000 definitions=main-2306130070 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Patchwork-Original-From: "Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches" From: "Kewen.Lin" Reply-To: "Kewen.Lin" Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org Sender: "Gcc-patches" X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: =?utf-8?q?INBOX?= X-GMAIL-THRID: =?utf-8?q?1768574338293818538?= X-GMAIL-MSGID: =?utf-8?q?1768574338293818538?= Hi, This patch is to make newly added test cases pr109932-{1,2}.c check int128 effective target to avoid unsupported type error on 32-bit. I did hit this failure during testing and fixed it, but made a stupid mistake not updating the local formatted patch which was actually out of date. Pushed as obvious in r14-1776-g16eb9d69079d76. BR, Kewen ----- PR testsuite/110230 PR target/109932 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c: Adjust with int128 effective target. * gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c: Ditto. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c | 1 + gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.34.1 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c index 3e3f9eaa65e..374d9f60618 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-1.c @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */ /* { dg-options "-maltivec -mno-vsx" } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c index 3e3f9eaa65e..374d9f60618 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109932-2.c @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */ /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */ /* { dg-options "-maltivec -mno-vsx" } */