[committed] openmp: Reject invalid forms of C++ #pragma omp atomic compare [PR106448]
Commit Message
Hi!
The allowed syntaxes of atomic compare don't allow ()s around the condition
of ?:, but we were accepting it in one case for C++.
Fixed thusly.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk.
2022-07-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/106448
* parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_atomic): For simple cast followed by
CPP_QUERY token, don't try cp_parser_binary_operation if compare
is true.
* c-c++-common/gomp/atomic-32.c: New test.
Jakub
@@ -41535,7 +41535,9 @@ restart:
goto saw_error;
}
token = cp_lexer_peek_token (parser->lexer);
- if (token->type != CPP_SEMICOLON && !cp_tree_equal (lhs, rhs1))
+ if (token->type != CPP_SEMICOLON
+ && (!compare || token->type != CPP_QUERY)
+ && !cp_tree_equal (lhs, rhs1))
{
cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse (parser);
cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser);
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* PR c++/106448 */
+
+int x, expr;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ #pragma omp atomic compare
+ x = (expr > x) ? expr : x; /* { dg-error "invalid (form|operator)" } */
+ #pragma omp atomic compare
+ x = (x < expr) ? expr : x; /* { dg-error "invalid (form|operator)" } */
+ #pragma omp atomic compare
+ x = (x == expr) ? expr : x; /* { dg-error "invalid (form|operator)" } */
+}