i386: Fix up ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp [PR107585]
Checks
Commit Message
Hi!
The following patch fixes ICE on the testcase. I've used GEN_INT
incorrectly thinking the code punts on the problematic boundaries.
It does, but only for LE and GE, i.e. signed comparisons, for unsigned
the boundaries are 0 and unsigned maximum, so when say unsigned char
adds one to 127 or subtracts one from 128 we need to canonicalize it.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
ok for trunk?
2022-11-10 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/107585
PR target/107546
* config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp): Use
gen_int_mode rather than GEN_INT.
* gcc.dg/pr107585.c: New test.
Jakub
Comments
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:29 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The following patch fixes ICE on the testcase. I've used GEN_INT
> incorrectly thinking the code punts on the problematic boundaries.
> It does, but only for LE and GE, i.e. signed comparisons, for unsigned
> the boundaries are 0 and unsigned maximum, so when say unsigned char
> adds one to 127 or subtracts one from 128 we need to canonicalize it.
>
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
> ok for trunk?
>
> 2022-11-10 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR target/107585
> PR target/107546
> * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp): Use
> gen_int_mode rather than GEN_INT.
>
> * gcc.dg/pr107585.c: New test.
OK as an obvious patch.
Thanks,
Uros.
>
> --- gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc.jj 2022-11-08 12:21:48.704047171 +0100
> +++ gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc 2022-11-09 14:40:12.157012775 +0100
> @@ -4540,7 +4540,8 @@ ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp (rtx dest, enum
> rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (n_elts);
> for (i = 0; i < n_elts; ++i)
> RTVEC_ELT (v, i)
> - = GEN_INT (INTVAL (CONST_VECTOR_ELT (cop1, i)) + 1);
> + = gen_int_mode (INTVAL (CONST_VECTOR_ELT (cop1, i)) + 1,
> + eltmode);
> cop1 = gen_rtx_CONST_VECTOR (mode, v);
> std::swap (cop0, cop1);
> code = code == LE ? GT : GTU;
> @@ -4584,7 +4585,8 @@ ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp (rtx dest, enum
> rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (n_elts);
> for (i = 0; i < n_elts; ++i)
> RTVEC_ELT (v, i)
> - = GEN_INT (INTVAL (CONST_VECTOR_ELT (cop1, i)) - 1);
> + = gen_int_mode (INTVAL (CONST_VECTOR_ELT (cop1, i)) - 1,
> + eltmode);
> cop1 = gen_rtx_CONST_VECTOR (mode, v);
> code = code == GE ? GT : GTU;
> break;
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr107585.c.jj 2022-11-09 14:52:37.554779118 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr107585.c 2022-11-09 14:48:24.063258991 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +/* PR target/107585 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned char __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
> +char c;
> +void bar (int);
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> + bar (((V) (c <= (V){127}))[2]);
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
@@ -4540,7 +4540,8 @@ ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp (rtx dest, enum
rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (n_elts);
for (i = 0; i < n_elts; ++i)
RTVEC_ELT (v, i)
- = GEN_INT (INTVAL (CONST_VECTOR_ELT (cop1, i)) + 1);
+ = gen_int_mode (INTVAL (CONST_VECTOR_ELT (cop1, i)) + 1,
+ eltmode);
cop1 = gen_rtx_CONST_VECTOR (mode, v);
std::swap (cop0, cop1);
code = code == LE ? GT : GTU;
@@ -4584,7 +4585,8 @@ ix86_expand_int_sse_cmp (rtx dest, enum
rtvec v = rtvec_alloc (n_elts);
for (i = 0; i < n_elts; ++i)
RTVEC_ELT (v, i)
- = GEN_INT (INTVAL (CONST_VECTOR_ELT (cop1, i)) - 1);
+ = gen_int_mode (INTVAL (CONST_VECTOR_ELT (cop1, i)) - 1,
+ eltmode);
cop1 = gen_rtx_CONST_VECTOR (mode, v);
code = code == GE ? GT : GTU;
break;
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* PR target/107585 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+typedef unsigned char __attribute__((__vector_size__ (16))) V;
+char c;
+void bar (int);
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+ bar (((V) (c <= (V){127}))[2]);
+}