sra: Disqualify bases of operands of asm gotos

Message ID 65a81ae9.0c0a0220.60e4f.1e95SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com
State Unresolved
Headers
Series sra: Disqualify bases of operands of asm gotos |

Checks

Context Check Description
snail/gcc-patch-check warning Git am fail log

Commit Message

Martin Jambor Jan. 17, 2024, 6:21 p.m. UTC
  Hi,

PR 110422 shows that SRA can ICE assuming there is a single edge
outgoing from a block terminated with an asm goto.  We need that for
BB-terminating statements so that any adjustments they make to the
aggregates can be copied over to their replacements.  Because we can't
have that after ASM gotos, we need to punt.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux, OK for master?  It will need
some tweaking for release branches, is it in principle OK for them too
(after testing)?

Thanks,

Martin


gcc/ChangeLog:

2024-01-17  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>

	PR tree-optimization/110422
	* tree-sra.cc (scan_function): Disqualify bases of operands of asm
	gotos.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2024-01-17  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>

	PR tree-optimization/110422
	* gcc.dg/torture/pr110422.c: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr110422.c | 10 +++++++++
 gcc/tree-sra.cc                         | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr110422.c
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr110422.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr110422.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2e171a7a19e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr110422.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ 
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+struct T { int x; };
+int foo(void) {
+  struct T v;
+  asm goto("" : "+r"(v.x) : : : lab);
+  return 0;
+lab:
+  return -5;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.cc b/gcc/tree-sra.cc
index 6a1141b7377..f8e71ec48b9 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-sra.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-sra.cc
@@ -1559,15 +1559,32 @@  scan_function (void)
 	    case GIMPLE_ASM:
 	      {
 		gasm *asm_stmt = as_a <gasm *> (stmt);
-		for (i = 0; i < gimple_asm_ninputs (asm_stmt); i++)
+		if (stmt_ends_bb_p (asm_stmt)
+		    && !single_succ_p (gimple_bb (asm_stmt)))
 		  {
-		    t = TREE_VALUE (gimple_asm_input_op (asm_stmt, i));
-		    ret |= build_access_from_expr (t, asm_stmt, false);
+		    for (i = 0; i < gimple_asm_ninputs (asm_stmt); i++)
+		      {
+			t = TREE_VALUE (gimple_asm_input_op (asm_stmt, i));
+			disqualify_base_of_expr (t, "OP of asm goto.");
+		      }
+		    for (i = 0; i < gimple_asm_noutputs (asm_stmt); i++)
+		      {
+			t = TREE_VALUE (gimple_asm_output_op (asm_stmt, i));
+			disqualify_base_of_expr (t, "OP of asm goto.");
+		      }
 		  }
-		for (i = 0; i < gimple_asm_noutputs (asm_stmt); i++)
+		else
 		  {
-		    t = TREE_VALUE (gimple_asm_output_op (asm_stmt, i));
-		    ret |= build_access_from_expr (t, asm_stmt, true);
+		    for (i = 0; i < gimple_asm_ninputs (asm_stmt); i++)
+		      {
+			t = TREE_VALUE (gimple_asm_input_op (asm_stmt, i));
+			ret |= build_access_from_expr (t, asm_stmt, false);
+		      }
+		    for (i = 0; i < gimple_asm_noutputs (asm_stmt); i++)
+		      {
+			t = TREE_VALUE (gimple_asm_output_op (asm_stmt, i));
+			ret |= build_access_from_expr (t, asm_stmt, true);
+		      }
 		  }
 	      }
 	      break;