[v2] RISC-V: Fix Zicond ICE on large constants
Checks
Commit Message
From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
Large constant cons and/or alt will trigger ICEs building GCC target
libraries (libgomp and libatomic) when the 'Zicond' extension is enabled.
For instance, zicond-ice-2.c (new test case in this commit) will cause
an ICE when SOME_NUMBER is 0x1000 or larger. While opposite numbers
corresponding cons/alt (two temp2 variables) are checked, cons/alt
themselves are not checked and causing 2 ICEs building
GCC target libraries as of this writing:
1. gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
2. gcc/libgomp/fortran.c
Coercing a large value into a register will fix the issue.
It also coerce a large cons into a register on "imm, imm" case (the author
could not reproduce but possible to cause an ICE).
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_conditional_move): Force
large constant cons/alt into a register.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c: New test. This is based on
an ICE at libat_lock_n func on gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
but heavily minimized.
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 21 +++++++++++++------
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c | 11 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c
base-commit: 72b639760a891c406725854bfb08132c83f0761a
Comments
On 9/5/23 06:08, Tsukasa OI wrote:
> From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
>
> Large constant cons and/or alt will trigger ICEs building GCC target
> libraries (libgomp and libatomic) when the 'Zicond' extension is enabled.
>
> For instance, zicond-ice-2.c (new test case in this commit) will cause
> an ICE when SOME_NUMBER is 0x1000 or larger. While opposite numbers
> corresponding cons/alt (two temp2 variables) are checked, cons/alt
> themselves are not checked and causing 2 ICEs building
> GCC target libraries as of this writing:
>
> 1. gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
> 2. gcc/libgomp/fortran.c
>
> Coercing a large value into a register will fix the issue.
>
> It also coerce a large cons into a register on "imm, imm" case (the author
> could not reproduce but possible to cause an ICE).
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_conditional_move): Force
> large constant cons/alt into a register.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c: New test. This is based on
> an ICE at libat_lock_n func on gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
> but heavily minimized.
"New test." is sufficient. No need to change it, just a note going forward.
OK. Thanks for taking care of this.
jeff
On 2023/09/06 10:22, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 9/5/23 06:08, Tsukasa OI wrote:
>> From: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com>
>>
>> Large constant cons and/or alt will trigger ICEs building GCC target
>> libraries (libgomp and libatomic) when the 'Zicond' extension is enabled.
>>
>> For instance, zicond-ice-2.c (new test case in this commit) will cause
>> an ICE when SOME_NUMBER is 0x1000 or larger. While opposite numbers
>> corresponding cons/alt (two temp2 variables) are checked, cons/alt
>> themselves are not checked and causing 2 ICEs building
>> GCC target libraries as of this writing:
>>
>> 1. gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
>> 2. gcc/libgomp/fortran.c
>>
>> Coercing a large value into a register will fix the issue.
>>
>> It also coerce a large cons into a register on "imm, imm" case (the
>> author
>> could not reproduce but possible to cause an ICE).
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_conditional_move): Force
>> large constant cons/alt into a register.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/riscv/zicond-ice-2.c: New test. This is based on
>> an ICE at libat_lock_n func on gcc/libatomic/config/posix/lock.c
>> but heavily minimized.
> "New test." is sufficient. No need to change it, just a note going
> forward.
>
> OK. Thanks for taking care of this.
>
> jeff
>
Thanks for reviewing. I'll remember that for the next time (I am adding
brief description in Binutils but not *that* long compared to this).
Committing.
Tsukasa
@@ -3917,6 +3917,11 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest, rtx op, rtx cons, rtx alt)
gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (mode, cond,
CONST0_RTX (mode),
alt)));
+ /* CONS might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate suitable
+ for an addi instruction. If that's the case, force it
+ into a register. */
+ if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (cons)))
+ cons = force_reg (mode, cons);
riscv_emit_binary (PLUS, dest, dest, cons);
return true;
}
@@ -3940,11 +3945,13 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest, rtx op, rtx cons, rtx alt)
rtx temp1 = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
rtx temp2 = gen_int_mode (-1 * INTVAL (cons), mode);
- /* TEMP2 might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate suitable
- for an addi instruction. If that's the case, force it into
- a register. */
+ /* TEMP2 and/or CONS might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate
+ suitable for an addi instruction. If that's the case, force it
+ into a register. */
if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (temp2)))
temp2 = force_reg (mode, temp2);
+ if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (cons)))
+ cons = force_reg (mode, cons);
riscv_emit_binary (PLUS, temp1, alt, temp2);
emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (dest,
@@ -3986,11 +3993,13 @@ riscv_expand_conditional_move (rtx dest, rtx op, rtx cons, rtx alt)
rtx temp1 = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
rtx temp2 = gen_int_mode (-1 * INTVAL (alt), mode);
- /* TEMP2 might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate suitable
- for an addi instruction. If that's the case, force it into
- a register. */
+ /* TEMP2 and/or ALT might not fit into a signed 12 bit immediate
+ suitable for an addi instruction. If that's the case, force it
+ into a register. */
if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (temp2)))
temp2 = force_reg (mode, temp2);
+ if (!SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (alt)))
+ alt = force_reg (mode, alt);
riscv_emit_binary (PLUS, temp1, cons, temp2);
emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (dest,
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zicond -mabi=lp64d" { target { rv64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv32gc_zicond -mabi=ilp32d" { target { rv32 } } } */
+
+#define SOME_NUMBER 0x1000
+
+unsigned long
+d (unsigned long n)
+{
+ return n > SOME_NUMBER ? SOME_NUMBER : n;
+}