Message ID | 20231207162743.686431-1-poulhies@adacore.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers |
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: ouuuleilei@gmail.com Received: by 2002:a59:bcd1:0:b0:403:3b70:6f57 with SMTP id r17csp4901556vqy; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 08:28:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHuabZwc+3FRs1yD6lujgPH0ULTSvDKxRWWGGy0VzT9seAKJyUDt7F0sdExKnPkRbAjH4Sv X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:292b:b0:464:50a1:7053 with SMTP id cz43-20020a056102292b00b0046450a17053mr3392451vsb.28.1701966495747; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:28:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; t=1701966495; cv=pass; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aScnsfD6NO8D0FyVc6cyZN8JPhu1t/ZkkwNlLF9QFLn4cllAIzCDnR2pyZwNhD0Cd3 3oIT0CF8bEBKUdJJKnD7o1X1FLzs1zECb9i5PNplDdSkfQEcJbfokzNP7CiF5P9WqaSb vkzQjMPR9yeHNIrkeAvqFDFVXjIV0a33ORIoJ66CSVBEG7HN0B1rDEvhBIJnHzb10ppV Xqk0mu325ZAA+zEy6JixSdxD6oZId4zlZ4iFuqI0z6FfswLY9a6vRTrPuv/4aLDvb5Um oA9i4xrP41dqyFIYQStNeqYpI4ndhxrXZFgW9lkthm3rN6PIEPE1kJIj8P5lMlQ3r2Km FeqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=errors-to:list-subscribe:list-help:list-post:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature :arc-filter:dmarc-filter:delivered-to; bh=i9ocCRrSV00bdC+W+nIc8ON52HN3FGLb4ilciAm2NOw=; fh=h98mFSi1RI9GUF1Fjw6Ymd7HVeAdKmNoVDxwAmFcsRg=; b=Hvl8qgEQAXi6J3iPAaJfRPsPWg93DUfpkdRXVfoHOFMj37rWk//whoO7kxYiSpS2gi Y9/kYYgcRuzJpsCbvoYDomeiOH3ZTWhxnJ7S2UQFetiKBfhzkL/zYNnE9Hv3uTsE9RYb WVvsM4SCTICcM0BqgKB7emlxhH6qzEh9+CcR8ZwbuNjCQIk7go4DEKnBk0Qlfy3Am5AQ TJ/Bh5IrpfxfesfG1a0mrWvvlrOHFcHzLhuKJZUQRta/h7TDNEzqOjOUc1ZnMiblIMUC KZly0NcrNvU2sQSTyqm4v6HFFWMlv5f/aidufUAsMtILNvpiTqpbemWtbYzuah6X9PIz nJbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@adacore.com header.s=google header.b=a7beVG+l; arc=pass (i=1); spf=pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 8.43.85.97 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=adacore.com Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org. [8.43.85.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e12-20020a67b64c000000b00465dbc88ef8si63884vsm.255.2023.12.07.08.28.15 for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:28:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 8.43.85.97 as permitted sender) client-ip=8.43.85.97; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@adacore.com header.s=google header.b=a7beVG+l; arc=pass (i=1); spf=pass (google.com: domain of gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org designates 8.43.85.97 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=adacore.com Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8E7385AC3C for <ouuuleilei@gmail.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 16:28:15 +0000 (GMT) X-Original-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Received: from mail-wr1-x42d.google.com (mail-wr1-x42d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09CD93858282 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 16:27:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 09CD93858282 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=adacore.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=adacore.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 09CD93858282 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42d ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701966472; cv=none; b=v+nUzGSUDMIfUyXOgeToTg7tgwkC9aQHm03PTjquegGt7+LXDZQ7X1ZHmzB42Qgh/3peQLfVp5tUA7SmrqHnLd4Vm+gkOHONxEsUZWEMxjWMOPGL779inuCY+jvL19dzMG4P9gQLkh1o4PCFYam23gRLUGEuKr1mfXmLZHeWrQg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701966472; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BOJ6anjaFB25Tt2Ft+XsMUeGe4YleSSXF/GCydzMdIA=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=uiXTmKVkCTMjZNy6nT/4xDBgO+0NPkzXGx5OieCVise+lAPq0PqmVgCe642vWAh33I8tMuKdJvZNDEK9ao32tKfLO24qdG8L2ss2NNYWsbCZxfP4Kh/x820o1mTt0HAR3MLHsd796ZejE4vPT9UBcIVmtgz5Kj7JMmoBPyQDc4A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-wr1-x42d.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3333b46f26aso1152197f8f.1 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:27:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adacore.com; s=google; t=1701966470; x=1702571270; darn=gcc.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i9ocCRrSV00bdC+W+nIc8ON52HN3FGLb4ilciAm2NOw=; b=a7beVG+lwrce1Hy+BfvI6nuEkMNi0xrbO+kcyJiEigjYhqaTqZ6RucdHCf2QHIMHSQ ob4g7A6z6mkxboBuATzTSd3Qsh/NvAFqZHZfChjlxn1Ex+8ACJvdtkhuUtz/AZJSCgAZ XEUG/EkP+ZDIwaTx1G7vDgHxRq0M7rv1mBMwnvs2+O6Z0aq5Aw5YDY1h59440v7EPtiJ dAiHuxPZ7EiXFBp2/oUKu+NIJcYONejlDSIBIEQ3n+E0bM+kIzIMZs6xJBCp9oHh13x4 RN30MKxZnJppT4jkx86la71TtM8KVAQjvHfyYZqSlYc5oGNx2Icz8XjHdpVP5R7mdN3U DMsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701966470; x=1702571270; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=i9ocCRrSV00bdC+W+nIc8ON52HN3FGLb4ilciAm2NOw=; b=UMwpp85rEA01dUp/iC1SQBOCPfZj2vqie9fR/pQwH3BaVG56/mNlEZPce/+726fd/P V5xUr40eCJdSEl7RhtrU27rhNgD9YI+d4QFSL9Cf558cSmAgxVkJzT0/HQdmyeaygdpf IQ6SlJ+J4E6JNwIc0qeW8fzD1IEVumEUIfRB229mmLw1mLMHq6gedOarMQtIcoZw8pt3 ebKQkyPZcLRYNxZ0mEwXBnwdRHGKGmrQ1mGh9CIeHozAgHCaaVIYDWSz2gv4Ll/LESOI Xa2fGyC9zYjznLRcB1Mm/COb7/MjX04EV2VIn632YgQ/9yZkd7iYSubmb3jPbxUYfslR 5ZmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSFIShKi7r6ghrcfIC46IVFPmkqbJ6tA8WuqCO1b2xaAyPMuO0 mr9XNIN/OMXKVjEnlv16TDlgOmBxTjqIyS14Q+I= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4522:0:b0:333:1ca5:7954 with SMTP id j2-20020a5d4522000000b003331ca57954mr1448887wra.69.1701966469791; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:27:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2001:861:3382:1a90:91a5:cefb:12f4:a4da]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m23-20020adfa3d7000000b00334b2272a7asm25972wrb.2.2023.12.07.08.27.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Dec 2023 08:27:49 -0800 (PST) From: =?utf-8?q?Marc_Poulhi=C3=A8s?= <poulhies@adacore.com> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: =?utf-8?q?Marc_Poulhi=C3=A8s?= <poulhies@adacore.com> Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: adjust call to abort in excess-precision-12 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 17:27:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20231207162743.686431-1-poulhies@adacore.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>, <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: gcc-patches-bounces+ouuuleilei=gmail.com@gcc.gnu.org X-getmail-retrieved-from-mailbox: INBOX X-GMAIL-THRID: 1784641220098841854 X-GMAIL-MSGID: 1784641220098841854 |
Series |
testsuite: adjust call to abort in excess-precision-12
|
|
Checks
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
snail/gcc-patch-check | success | Github commit url |
Commit Message
Marc Poulhiès
Dec. 7, 2023, 4:27 p.m. UTC
abort() is not always available, using the builtin as done in other tests. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C: call builtin_abort instead of abort. --- Tested on x86_64-linux and x86_64-elf. Ok for master? gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 05:27:28PM +0100, Marc Poulhiès wrote: > abort() is not always available, using the builtin as done in other > tests. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C: call builtin_abort instead of abort. > --- > Tested on x86_64-linux and x86_64-elf. > > Ok for master? > > gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C > index dff48c07c8b..e59f7c3b1fb 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C > @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ main (void) > unsigned long long int u = (1ULL << 63) + 1; > > if ((f <=> u) >= 0) > - abort (); > + __builtin_abort (); > > if ((u <=> f) <= 0) > - abort (); > + __builtin_abort (); Why wouldn't they have abort and what else does __builtin_abort () expand to? There are 2000+ other tests in gcc.target/i386/ which call abort (), not __builtin_abort (), after including <stdlib.h> directly or indirectly or declaring it themselves. This test in particular includes <cstdlib> Does whatever target you are running this into provide just std::abort () and not abort (); from <cstdlib>? If so, perhaps it should call std::abort (); instead of abort (). Jakub
Hello, > Why wouldn't they have abort and what else does __builtin_abort () expand > to? It expands to abort but works around the "abort is undeclared" error. > There are 2000+ other tests in gcc.target/i386/ which call abort (), > not __builtin_abort (), after including <stdlib.h> directly or indirectly > or declaring it themselves. This test in particular includes <cstdlib> > > Does whatever target you are running this into provide just std::abort () > and not abort (); from <cstdlib>? If so, perhaps it should call > std::abort (); instead of abort (). You are correct, std::abort() is a better solution. cstdlib does not include stdlib.h because I'm on a non-hosted target. I'll send a refreshed patch. Thanks, Marc
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C index dff48c07c8b..e59f7c3b1fb 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/excess-precision-12.C @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ main (void) unsigned long long int u = (1ULL << 63) + 1; if ((f <=> u) >= 0) - abort (); + __builtin_abort (); if ((u <=> f) <= 0) - abort (); + __builtin_abort (); }