tree-optimization/112281 - loop distribution and zero dependence distances
Checks
Commit Message
The following fixes an omission in dependence testing for loop
distribution. When the overall dependence distance is not zero but
the dependence direction in the innermost common loop is = there is
a conflict between the partitions and we have to merge them.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, pushed.
PR tree-optimization/112281
* tree-loop-distribution.cc
(loop_distribution::pg_add_dependence_edges): For = in the
innermost common loop record a partition conflict.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-1.c: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-2.c: Likewise.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-1.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-2.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
gcc/tree-loop-distribution.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-1.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-2.c
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-ftree-loop-distribution" } */
+
+struct {
+ int : 8;
+ int a;
+} b, d[4] = {{0}, {0}, {0}, {5}};
+int c, e;
+int main() {
+ for (c = 2; c; c--)
+ for (e = 0; e < 2; e++) {
+ d[c] = b = d[c + 1];
+ d[c + 1].a = 0;
+ }
+ if (b.a != 0)
+ __builtin_abort();
+ return 0;
+}
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-ftree-loop-distribution" } */
+
+struct {
+ int : 8;
+ int a;
+} b, d[4] = {{5}, {0}, {0}, {0}};
+int c, e;
+int main() {
+ for (c = 0; c < 2; c++)
+ for (e = 0; e < 2; e++) {
+ d[c + 1] = b = d[c];
+ d[c].a = 0;
+ }
+ if (b.a != 0)
+ __builtin_abort();
+ return 0;
+}
@@ -2155,9 +2155,6 @@ loop_distribution::pg_add_dependence_edges (struct graph *rdg, int dir,
}
else if (DDR_ARE_DEPENDENT (ddr) == NULL_TREE)
{
- if (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr))
- this_dir = -this_dir;
-
/* Known dependences can still be unordered througout the
iteration space, see gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-16.c and
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94969.c. */
@@ -2170,7 +2167,20 @@ loop_distribution::pg_add_dependence_edges (struct graph *rdg, int dir,
/* Else as the distance vector is lexicographic positive swap
the dependence direction. */
else
- this_dir = -this_dir;
+ {
+ if (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr))
+ this_dir = -this_dir;
+ this_dir = -this_dir;
+
+ /* When then dependence distance of the innermost common
+ loop of the DRs is zero we have a conflict. */
+ auto l1 = gimple_bb (DR_STMT (dr1))->loop_father;
+ auto l2 = gimple_bb (DR_STMT (dr2))->loop_father;
+ int idx = index_in_loop_nest (find_common_loop (l1, l2)->num,
+ DDR_LOOP_NEST (ddr));
+ if (DDR_DIST_VECT (ddr, 0)[idx] == 0)
+ this_dir = 2;
+ }
}
else
this_dir = 0;