Remove xfail from gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c
Checks
Commit Message
So the xfail was there because at one point the difference
from having logical-op-non-short-circuit set to 1 or 0 made a
difference in being able to optimizing a conditional way.
This has not been true for over 10 years in this case so
instead of keeping on adding to the xfail list, removing it
is the right thing to do.
Committed as obvious after a test on x86_64-linux-gnu.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: Remove xfail.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
@@ -29,8 +29,4 @@ void test55 (int x, int y)
/* There should be not link_error calls, if there is any the
optimization has failed */
-/* ??? Ug. This one may or may not fail based on how fold decides
- that the && should be emitted (based on BRANCH_COST). Fix this
- by teaching dom to look through && and register all components
- as true. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" { xfail { ! "alpha*-*-* arm*-*-* aarch64*-*-* powerpc*-*-* cris-*-* hppa*-*-* i?86-*-* mmix-*-* mips*-*-* m68k*-*-* moxie-*-* nds32*-*-* s390*-*-* sh*-*-* sparc*-*-* visium-*-* x86_64-*-* riscv*-*-* or1k*-*-* msp430-*-* pru*-*-* nvptx*-*-*" } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "link_error" 0 "optimized" } } */