[v1] c++: follow DR 2386 and update implementation of get_tuple_size [PR110216]
Checks
Commit Message
DR 2386 updated the tuple_size requirements for structured binding and
it now requires tuple_size to be considered only if
std::tuple_size<TYPE> names a complete class type with member value. GCC
before this patch does not follow the updated requrements, and this
patch is intended to implement it.
DR 2386
PR c++/110216
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.cc (get_tuple_size): Update implemetation to follow DR 2386.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp10.C: Update expected error message for DR 2386.
* g++.dg/cpp1z/pr110216.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: gnaggnoyil <gnaggnoyil@gmail.com>
---
Hi,
As https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/626696.html mentioned,
I've updated the corresponding tests. I ran all tests in g++.dg and no
unexpected fail exists now.
gcc/cp/decl.cc | 6 +++++-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp10.C | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/pr110216.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/pr110216.C
Comments
On 8/12/23 04:16, gnaggnoyil wrote:
> DR 2386 updated the tuple_size requirements for structured binding and
> it now requires tuple_size to be considered only if
> std::tuple_size<TYPE> names a complete class type with member value. GCC
> before this patch does not follow the updated requrements, and this
> patch is intended to implement it.
>
> DR 2386
> PR c++/110216
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * decl.cc (get_tuple_size): Update implemetation to follow DR 2386.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp10.C: Update expected error message for DR 2386.
> * g++.dg/cpp1z/pr110216.C: New test.
>
> Signed-off-by: gnaggnoyil <gnaggnoyil@gmail.com>
Pushed, thanks!
Note that the GCC DCO policy (https://gcc.gnu.org/dco.html) requires
real names in the sign-off; in this case I've applied the patch anyway
because it is small enough that it's not legally significant for copyright.
I think if you want to contribute larger patches under this pseudonym,
you should file a copyright assignment with the FSF, which explicitly
allows this. "If a contributor wants the FSF to publish only a
pseudonym, that is ok. The contributor should say this, and state the
desired pseudonym, when answering the request- form. The actual legal
papers will use the real name, but the FSF will publish only the
pseudonym."[2]
Thanks again,
Jason
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/Documentation/process?id=d4563201f33a022fc0353033d9dfeb1606a88330
[2] https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Copyright-Papers
@@ -8940,10 +8940,14 @@ get_tuple_size (tree type)
/*context*/std_node,
/*entering_scope*/false, tf_none);
inst = complete_type (inst);
- if (inst == error_mark_node || !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (inst))
+ if (inst == error_mark_node
+ || !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (inst)
+ || !CLASS_TYPE_P (type))
return NULL_TREE;
tree val = lookup_qualified_name (inst, value_identifier,
LOOK_want::NORMAL, /*complain*/false);
+ if (val == error_mark_node)
+ return NULL_TREE;
if (VAR_P (val) || TREE_CODE (val) == CONST_DECL)
val = maybe_constant_value (val);
if (TREE_CODE (val) == INTEGER_CST)
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ namespace std {
struct A1 { int i,j; } a1;
template<> struct std::tuple_size<A1> { };
-void f1() { auto [ x ] = a1; } // { dg-error "is not an integral constant expression" }
+void f1() { auto [ x ] = a1; } // { dg-error "only 1 name provided" }
struct A2 { int i,j; } a2;
template<> struct std::tuple_size<A2> { enum { value = 5 }; };
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// DR 2386
+// PR c++/110216
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+
+namespace std{
+ template <typename T> struct tuple_size;
+}
+
+struct A {
+ int x = 0;
+};
+
+template <> struct std::tuple_size <::A> {};
+
+auto [x] = A{};
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+}