[v2,2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __is_scalar for std::is_scalar

Message ID 20230708044539.61276-2-kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org
State Accepted
Headers
Series [v2,1/2] c++, libstdc++: implement __is_scalar built-in trait |

Checks

Context Check Description
snail/gcc-patch-check success Github commit url

Commit Message

Ken Matsui July 8, 2023, 4:45 a.m. UTC
  This patch gets std::is_scalar to dispatch to new built-in trait
__is_scalar.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

	* include/std/type_traits (is_scalar): Use __is_scalar built-in
	trait.
	(is_scalar_v): Likewise.

Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
  

Comments

Jonathan Wakely July 12, 2023, 9:50 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 05:47, Ken Matsui via Libstdc++
<libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> This patch gets std::is_scalar to dispatch to new built-in trait
> __is_scalar.
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
>         * include/std/type_traits (is_scalar): Use __is_scalar built-in
>         trait.
>         (is_scalar_v): Likewise.

OK for trunk (conditional on the front-end change being committed
first of course).


>
> Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
> ---
>  libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> index 0e7a9c9c7f3..bc90b2c61ca 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> @@ -678,11 +678,18 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>      struct is_member_pointer;
>
>    /// is_scalar
> +#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
> +  template<typename _Tp>
> +    struct is_scalar
> +    : public __bool_constant<__is_scalar(_Tp)>
> +    { };
> +#else
>    template<typename _Tp>
>      struct is_scalar
>      : public __or_<is_arithmetic<_Tp>, is_enum<_Tp>, is_pointer<_Tp>,
>                     is_member_pointer<_Tp>, is_null_pointer<_Tp>>::type
>      { };
> +#endif
>
>    /// is_compound
>    template<typename _Tp>
> @@ -3204,8 +3211,15 @@ template <typename _Tp>
>    inline constexpr bool is_fundamental_v = is_fundamental<_Tp>::value;
>  template <typename _Tp>
>    inline constexpr bool is_object_v = is_object<_Tp>::value;
> +
> +#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
> +template <typename _Tp>
> +  inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = __is_scalar(_Tp);
> +#else
>  template <typename _Tp>
>    inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = is_scalar<_Tp>::value;
> +#endif
> +
>  template <typename _Tp>
>    inline constexpr bool is_compound_v = is_compound<_Tp>::value;
>  template <typename _Tp>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
  
Ken Matsui July 12, 2023, 6:32 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:50 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 05:47, Ken Matsui via Libstdc++
> <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > This patch gets std::is_scalar to dispatch to new built-in trait
> > __is_scalar.
> >
> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * include/std/type_traits (is_scalar): Use __is_scalar built-in
> >         trait.
> >         (is_scalar_v): Likewise.
>
> OK for trunk (conditional on the front-end change being committed
> first of course).
>

Thank you for your review!

Just to confirm, this approval does not include the [1/2] patch, does
it? Or, did you approve this entire patch series?

> conditional on the front-end change being committed first of course

Does this mean we want to commit this [2/2] patch before committing
the [1/2] patch in this case?

Also, can I tweak the commit message without being approved again,
such as attaching the benchmark result?

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
> > ---
> >  libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > index 0e7a9c9c7f3..bc90b2c61ca 100644
> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > @@ -678,11 +678,18 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> >      struct is_member_pointer;
> >
> >    /// is_scalar
> > +#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
> > +  template<typename _Tp>
> > +    struct is_scalar
> > +    : public __bool_constant<__is_scalar(_Tp)>
> > +    { };
> > +#else
> >    template<typename _Tp>
> >      struct is_scalar
> >      : public __or_<is_arithmetic<_Tp>, is_enum<_Tp>, is_pointer<_Tp>,
> >                     is_member_pointer<_Tp>, is_null_pointer<_Tp>>::type
> >      { };
> > +#endif
> >
> >    /// is_compound
> >    template<typename _Tp>
> > @@ -3204,8 +3211,15 @@ template <typename _Tp>
> >    inline constexpr bool is_fundamental_v = is_fundamental<_Tp>::value;
> >  template <typename _Tp>
> >    inline constexpr bool is_object_v = is_object<_Tp>::value;
> > +
> > +#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
> > +template <typename _Tp>
> > +  inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = __is_scalar(_Tp);
> > +#else
> >  template <typename _Tp>
> >    inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = is_scalar<_Tp>::value;
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  template <typename _Tp>
> >    inline constexpr bool is_compound_v = is_compound<_Tp>::value;
> >  template <typename _Tp>
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
>
  
Xi Ruoyao July 12, 2023, 6:56 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:32 -0700, Ken Matsui via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > conditional on the front-end change being committed first of course
> 
> Does this mean we want to commit this [2/2] patch before committing
> the [1/2] patch in this case?

No, this mean you should get 1/2 reviewed and committed first.

> Also, can I tweak the commit message without being approved again,
> such as attaching the benchmark result?

Yes, as long as the ChangeLog is still correct (the Git hook will reject
a push with wrong ChangeLog format anyway).
  
Ken Matsui July 12, 2023, 7:06 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 11:56 AM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:32 -0700, Ken Matsui via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > conditional on the front-end change being committed first of course
> >
> > Does this mean we want to commit this [2/2] patch before committing
> > the [1/2] patch in this case?
>
> No, this mean you should get 1/2 reviewed and committed first.
>
> > Also, can I tweak the commit message without being approved again,
> > such as attaching the benchmark result?
>
> Yes, as long as the ChangeLog is still correct (the Git hook will reject
> a push with wrong ChangeLog format anyway).

I see. Thank you so much!

> --
> Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
  
Jonathan Wakely July 12, 2023, 7:23 p.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, 19:33 Ken Matsui via Libstdc++, <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:50 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 05:47, Ken Matsui via Libstdc++
> > <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch gets std::is_scalar to dispatch to new built-in trait
> > > __is_scalar.
> > >
> > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * include/std/type_traits (is_scalar): Use __is_scalar built-in
> > >         trait.
> > >         (is_scalar_v): Likewise.
> >
> > OK for trunk (conditional on the front-end change being committed
> > first of course).
> >
>
> Thank you for your review!
>
> Just to confirm, this approval does not include the [1/2] patch, does
> it? Or, did you approve this entire patch series?
>

Only this patch. I cannot approve compiler changes, I'm only a reviewer for
libstdc++.



> > conditional on the front-end change being committed first of course
>
> Does this mean we want to commit this [2/2] patch before committing
> the [1/2] patch in this case?
>

The other way around, as Xi Ruoyao said.



> Also, can I tweak the commit message without being approved again,
> such as attaching the benchmark result?
>

Yes, that's fine.


> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
> > > ---
> > >  libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > > index 0e7a9c9c7f3..bc90b2c61ca 100644
> > > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > > @@ -678,11 +678,18 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> > >      struct is_member_pointer;
> > >
> > >    /// is_scalar
> > > +#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
> > > +  template<typename _Tp>
> > > +    struct is_scalar
> > > +    : public __bool_constant<__is_scalar(_Tp)>
> > > +    { };
> > > +#else
> > >    template<typename _Tp>
> > >      struct is_scalar
> > >      : public __or_<is_arithmetic<_Tp>, is_enum<_Tp>, is_pointer<_Tp>,
> > >                     is_member_pointer<_Tp>, is_null_pointer<_Tp>>::type
> > >      { };
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > >    /// is_compound
> > >    template<typename _Tp>
> > > @@ -3204,8 +3211,15 @@ template <typename _Tp>
> > >    inline constexpr bool is_fundamental_v = is_fundamental<_Tp>::value;
> > >  template <typename _Tp>
> > >    inline constexpr bool is_object_v = is_object<_Tp>::value;
> > > +
> > > +#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
> > > +template <typename _Tp>
> > > +  inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = __is_scalar(_Tp);
> > > +#else
> > >  template <typename _Tp>
> > >    inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = is_scalar<_Tp>::value;
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >  template <typename _Tp>
> > >    inline constexpr bool is_compound_v = is_compound<_Tp>::value;
> > >  template <typename _Tp>
> > > --
> > > 2.41.0
> > >
> >
>
  
Ken Matsui July 12, 2023, 7:35 p.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:23 PM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2023, 19:33 Ken Matsui via Libstdc++, <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:50 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 at 05:47, Ken Matsui via Libstdc++
>> > <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > This patch gets std::is_scalar to dispatch to new built-in trait
>> > > __is_scalar.
>> > >
>> > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>> > >
>> > >         * include/std/type_traits (is_scalar): Use __is_scalar built-in
>> > >         trait.
>> > >         (is_scalar_v): Likewise.
>> >
>> > OK for trunk (conditional on the front-end change being committed
>> > first of course).
>> >
>>
>> Thank you for your review!
>>
>> Just to confirm, this approval does not include the [1/2] patch, does
>> it? Or, did you approve this entire patch series?
>
>
> Only this patch. I cannot approve compiler changes, I'm only a reviewer for libstdc++.
>
>
>>
>> > conditional on the front-end change being committed first of course
>>
>> Does this mean we want to commit this [2/2] patch before committing
>> the [1/2] patch in this case?
>
>
> The other way around, as Xi Ruoyao said.
>
>
>>
>> Also, can I tweak the commit message without being approved again,
>> such as attaching the benchmark result?
>
>
> Yes, that's fine.

Thank you!

>>
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>
>> > > ---
>> > >  libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > > index 0e7a9c9c7f3..bc90b2c61ca 100644
>> > > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > > @@ -678,11 +678,18 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>> > >      struct is_member_pointer;
>> > >
>> > >    /// is_scalar
>> > > +#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
>> > > +  template<typename _Tp>
>> > > +    struct is_scalar
>> > > +    : public __bool_constant<__is_scalar(_Tp)>
>> > > +    { };
>> > > +#else
>> > >    template<typename _Tp>
>> > >      struct is_scalar
>> > >      : public __or_<is_arithmetic<_Tp>, is_enum<_Tp>, is_pointer<_Tp>,
>> > >                     is_member_pointer<_Tp>, is_null_pointer<_Tp>>::type
>> > >      { };
>> > > +#endif
>> > >
>> > >    /// is_compound
>> > >    template<typename _Tp>
>> > > @@ -3204,8 +3211,15 @@ template <typename _Tp>
>> > >    inline constexpr bool is_fundamental_v = is_fundamental<_Tp>::value;
>> > >  template <typename _Tp>
>> > >    inline constexpr bool is_object_v = is_object<_Tp>::value;
>> > > +
>> > > +#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
>> > > +template <typename _Tp>
>> > > +  inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = __is_scalar(_Tp);
>> > > +#else
>> > >  template <typename _Tp>
>> > >    inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = is_scalar<_Tp>::value;
>> > > +#endif
>> > > +
>> > >  template <typename _Tp>
>> > >    inline constexpr bool is_compound_v = is_compound<_Tp>::value;
>> > >  template <typename _Tp>
>> > > --
>> > > 2.41.0
>> > >
>> >
  

Patch

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
index 0e7a9c9c7f3..bc90b2c61ca 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
@@ -678,11 +678,18 @@  _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     struct is_member_pointer;
 
   /// is_scalar
+#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
+  template<typename _Tp>
+    struct is_scalar
+    : public __bool_constant<__is_scalar(_Tp)>
+    { };
+#else
   template<typename _Tp>
     struct is_scalar
     : public __or_<is_arithmetic<_Tp>, is_enum<_Tp>, is_pointer<_Tp>,
                    is_member_pointer<_Tp>, is_null_pointer<_Tp>>::type
     { };
+#endif
 
   /// is_compound
   template<typename _Tp>
@@ -3204,8 +3211,15 @@  template <typename _Tp>
   inline constexpr bool is_fundamental_v = is_fundamental<_Tp>::value;
 template <typename _Tp>
   inline constexpr bool is_object_v = is_object<_Tp>::value;
+
+#if __has_builtin(__is_scalar)
+template <typename _Tp>
+  inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = __is_scalar(_Tp);
+#else
 template <typename _Tp>
   inline constexpr bool is_scalar_v = is_scalar<_Tp>::value;
+#endif
+
 template <typename _Tp>
   inline constexpr bool is_compound_v = is_compound<_Tp>::value;
 template <typename _Tp>