[1/2,RISC-V] fix cfi issue in save-restore.

Message ID 20230602104247.26454-1-gaofei@eswincomputing.com
State Accepted
Headers
Series [1/2,RISC-V] fix cfi issue in save-restore. |

Checks

Context Check Description
snail/gcc-patch-check success Github commit url

Commit Message

Fei Gao June 2, 2023, 10:42 a.m. UTC
  This patch fixes a cfi issue introduced by
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=60524be1e3929d83e15fceac6e2aa053c8a6fb20

Test code:
char my_getchar();
float getf();
int test_f0()
{
  int s0 = my_getchar();
  float f0 = getf();
  int b = my_getchar();
  return f0+s0+b;
}

cflags: -g -Os -march=rv32imafc -mabi=ilp32f -msave-restore -mcmodel=medlow

before patch:
test_f0:
...
	.cfi_startproc
	call	t0,__riscv_save_1
	.cfi_offset 8, -8
	.cfi_offset 1, -4
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
...
	addi	sp,sp,-16
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32

...

	addi	sp,sp,16
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 0  // issue here
...
	tail	__riscv_restore_1
	.cfi_restore 8
	.cfi_restore 1
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset -16 // issue here
	.cfi_endproc

after patch:
test_f0:
...
	.cfi_startproc
	call	t0,__riscv_save_1
	.cfi_offset 8, -8
	.cfi_offset 1, -4
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
...
	addi	sp,sp,-16
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32

...

	addi	sp,sp,16
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16  // corrected here
...
	tail	__riscv_restore_1
	.cfi_restore 8
	.cfi_restore 1
	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 0 // corrected here
	.cfi_endproc

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_epilogue): fix cfi issue with correct offset.
---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Comments

Jeff Law June 3, 2023, 5:12 p.m. UTC | #1
On 6/2/23 04:42, Fei Gao wrote:
> This patch fixes a cfi issue introduced by
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=60524be1e3929d83e15fceac6e2aa053c8a6fb20
> 
> Test code:
> char my_getchar();
> float getf();
> int test_f0()
> {
>    int s0 = my_getchar();
>    float f0 = getf();
>    int b = my_getchar();
>    return f0+s0+b;
> }
> 
> cflags: -g -Os -march=rv32imafc -mabi=ilp32f -msave-restore -mcmodel=medlow
> 
> before patch:
> test_f0:
> ...
> 	.cfi_startproc
> 	call	t0,__riscv_save_1
> 	.cfi_offset 8, -8
> 	.cfi_offset 1, -4
> 	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> ...
> 	addi	sp,sp,-16
> 	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
> 
> ...
> 
> 	addi	sp,sp,16
> 	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 0  // issue here
> ...
> 	tail	__riscv_restore_1
> 	.cfi_restore 8
> 	.cfi_restore 1
> 	.cfi_def_cfa_offset -16 // issue here
> 	.cfi_endproc
> 
> after patch:
> test_f0:
> ...
> 	.cfi_startproc
> 	call	t0,__riscv_save_1
> 	.cfi_offset 8, -8
> 	.cfi_offset 1, -4
> 	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
> ...
> 	addi	sp,sp,-16
> 	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 32
> 
> ...
> 
> 	addi	sp,sp,16
> 	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16  // corrected here
> ...
> 	tail	__riscv_restore_1
> 	.cfi_restore 8
> 	.cfi_restore 1
> 	.cfi_def_cfa_offset 0 // corrected here
> 	.cfi_endproc
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>          * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_expand_epilogue): fix cfi issue with correct offset.
I fixed a trivial whitespace problem, rewrapped the ChangeLog and pushed 
this patch to the trunk.  Please consider adding a testcase for this bug 
to the testsuite.

jeff
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 85db1e3c86b..469af02bdf7 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -5652,7 +5652,7 @@  riscv_expand_epilogue (int style)
 					   adjust));
 	  rtx dwarf = NULL_RTX;
 	  rtx cfa_adjust_rtx = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
-					     GEN_INT (step2));
+					     GEN_INT (step2 + libcall_size));
 
 	  dwarf = alloc_reg_note (REG_CFA_DEF_CFA, cfa_adjust_rtx, dwarf);
 	  RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
@@ -5689,7 +5689,7 @@  riscv_expand_epilogue (int style)
 
       rtx dwarf = NULL_RTX;
       rtx cfa_adjust_rtx = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx,
-					 const0_rtx);
+					 GEN_INT (libcall_size ));
       dwarf = alloc_reg_note (REG_CFA_DEF_CFA, cfa_adjust_rtx, dwarf);
       RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;