[COMMITTED] ada: Fix incorrect handling of Aggregate aspect

Message ID 20230525080522.1955545-1-poulhies@adacore.com
State Accepted
Headers
Series [COMMITTED] ada: Fix incorrect handling of Aggregate aspect |

Checks

Context Check Description
snail/gcc-patch-check success Github commit url

Commit Message

Marc Poulhiès May 25, 2023, 8:05 a.m. UTC
  This change fixes 2 incorrect handlings of the aspect.
The arguments are now correctly resolved and the aspect is rejected on
non array types.

gcc/ada/

	* sem_ch13.adb (Analyze_One_Aspect): Mark Aggregate aspect as
	needing delayed resolution and reject the aspect on non-array
	type.

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on master.

---
 gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
index d40c70f6ee4..a3819725181 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch13.adb
@@ -2908,10 +2908,10 @@  package body Sem_Ch13 is
             end case;
 
             if Delay_Required
-
                and then (A_Id = Aspect_Stable_Properties
                           or else A_Id = Aspect_Designated_Storage_Model
-                          or else A_Id = Aspect_Storage_Model_Type)
+                          or else A_Id = Aspect_Storage_Model_Type
+                          or else A_Id = Aspect_Aggregate)
                --  ??? It seems like we should do this for all aspects, not
                --  just these, but that causes as-yet-undiagnosed regressions.
 
@@ -4203,6 +4203,12 @@  package body Sem_Ch13 is
                   Aitem := Empty;
 
                when Aspect_Aggregate =>
+                  if Is_Array_Type (E) then
+                     Error_Msg_N
+                       ("aspect% can only be applied to non-array type", Id);
+                     goto Continue;
+                  end if;
+
                   Validate_Aspect_Aggregate (Expr);
                   Record_Rep_Item (E, Aspect);
                   goto Continue;