[2/2] PHIOPT: Improve replace_phi_edge_with_variable for diamond shapped bb

Message ID 20230503023050.880728-2-apinski@marvell.com
State Accepted
Headers
Series [1/2] Factor out copy_phi_args from gimple_duplicate_sese_tail and remove_forwarder_block. |

Checks

Context Check Description
snail/gcc-patch-check success Github commit url

Commit Message

Andrew Pinski May 3, 2023, 2:30 a.m. UTC
  While looking at differences between what minmax_replacement
and match_simplify_replacement does. I noticed that they sometimes
chose different edges to remove. I decided we should be able to do
better and be able to remove both empty basic blocks in the
case of match_simplify_replacement as that moves the statements.

This also updates the testcases as now match_simplify_replacement
will remove the unused MIN/MAX_EXPR and they were checking for
those.

OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* tree-ssa-phiopt.cc (replace_phi_edge_with_variable): Handle
	diamond form bb with forwarder only empty blocks better.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-15.c: Update test.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-16.c: Update test.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-3.c: Update test.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-4.c: Update test.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-5.c: Update test.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-8.c: Update test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-15.c |  3 ++-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-16.c |  9 +++----
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-3.c  |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-4.c  |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-5.c  |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-8.c  |  2 +-
 gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc                    | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 7 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
  

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-15.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-15.c
index 8a39871c938..6731f91e6c3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-15.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-15.c
@@ -30,5 +30,6 @@  main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 3 "phiopt1" } } */
+/* There should only be two MIN_EXPR left, the 3rd one was removed. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 2 "phiopt1" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MAX_EXPR" 0 "phiopt1" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-16.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-16.c
index 623b12b3f74..094364e6424 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-16.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-16.c
@@ -25,11 +25,8 @@  main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* After phiopt1, there really should be only 3 MIN_EXPR in the IR (including debug statements).
-   But the way phiopt does not cleanup the CFG all the time, the PHI might still reference the
-   alternative bb's moved statement.
-   Note in the end, we do dce the statement and other debug statements to end up with only 2 MIN_EXPR.
-   So check that too. */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 4 "phiopt1" } } */
+/* After phiopt1, will be only 2 MIN_EXPR in the IR (including debug statements). */
+/* xk will only have the final result so the extra debug info does not change anything. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 2 "phiopt1" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 2 "optimized" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MAX_EXPR" 0 "phiopt1" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-3.c
index 2af10776346..521afe3e4d9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-3.c
@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@  main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 3 "phiopt1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 2 "phiopt1" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MAX_EXPR" 0 "phiopt1" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-4.c
index 973f39bfed3..49e27185b5e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-4.c
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@  main (void)
 }
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 0 "phiopt1" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MAX_EXPR" 3 "phiopt1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MAX_EXPR" 2 "phiopt1" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-5.c
index 34e4e720511..194c881cc98 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-5.c
@@ -25,5 +25,5 @@  main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 2 "phiopt1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 1 "phiopt1" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MAX_EXPR" 1 "phiopt1" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-8.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-8.c
index 0160e573fef..d5cb53145ea 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-8.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-8.c
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@  main (void)
 }
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MIN_EXPR" 1 "phiopt1" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MAX_EXPR" 2 "phiopt1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "MAX_EXPR" 1 "phiopt1" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc
index 37b98ef3c52..8905e6c4d21 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.cc
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@  replace_phi_edge_with_variable (basic_block cond_block,
   basic_block bb = gimple_bb (phi);
   gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
   tree phi_result = PHI_RESULT (phi);
+  bool deleteboth = false;
 
   /* Duplicate range info if they are the only things setting the target PHI.
      This is needed as later on, the new_tree will be replacing
@@ -137,7 +138,14 @@  replace_phi_edge_with_variable (basic_block cond_block,
       keep_edge = EDGE_SUCC (cond_block, 1);
     }
   else if ((keep_edge = find_edge (cond_block, e->src)))
-    ;
+    {
+      basic_block bb1 = EDGE_SUCC (cond_block, 0)->dest;
+      basic_block bb2 = EDGE_SUCC (cond_block, 1)->dest;
+      if (single_pred_p (bb1) && single_pred_p (bb2)
+	  && single_succ_p (bb1) && single_succ_p (bb2)
+	  && empty_block_p (bb1) && empty_block_p (bb2))
+	deleteboth = true;
+    }
   else
     gcc_unreachable ();
 
@@ -148,6 +156,28 @@  replace_phi_edge_with_variable (basic_block cond_block,
       e->probability = profile_probability::always ();
       delete_basic_block (edge_to_remove->dest);
 
+      /* Eliminate the COND_EXPR at the end of COND_BLOCK.  */
+      gsi = gsi_last_bb (cond_block);
+      gsi_remove (&gsi, true);
+    }
+  else if (deleteboth)
+    {
+      basic_block bb1 = EDGE_SUCC (cond_block, 0)->dest;
+      basic_block bb2 = EDGE_SUCC (cond_block, 1)->dest;
+
+      edge newedge = redirect_edge_and_branch (keep_edge, bb);
+      /* no new edge should be the same. */
+      gcc_assert (newedge == keep_edge);
+      keep_edge->flags |= EDGE_FALLTHRU;
+      keep_edge->flags &= ~(EDGE_TRUE_VALUE | EDGE_FALSE_VALUE);
+      keep_edge->probability = profile_probability::always ();
+      /* Copy the edge's phi entry from the old one */
+      copy_phi_args(bb, e, keep_edge);
+
+      /* Delete the old 2 empty basic blocks */
+      delete_basic_block (bb1);
+      delete_basic_block (bb2);
+
       /* Eliminate the COND_EXPR at the end of COND_BLOCK.  */
       gsi = gsi_last_bb (cond_block);
       gsi_remove (&gsi, true);